New Annan proposal puts the Syrian crisis in Iranian and Russian hands

DEBKAfile Special Report June 6, 2012, 11:18 PM

The Syrian connection
Israel remains dormant despite the serious consequences to its strategic and security situation threatened by the new proposal the UN-Arab League envoy for Syria Kofi Annan is to present to the UN Thursday, June 7, for saving his peace plan. The nub of his proposal, DEBKAfile’s sources disclose, is the creation of a “contact group” for handling the hot Syrian potato. It is to be composed of the five permanent Security Council members (US, UK, France, Russia and China) plus Iran, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

The proposal has won the blessing of the Obama administration, meaning its consent to letting the two powers that will dominate the contact group, Russia and Iran, determine the course and outcome of the Syrian crisis.

Washington believes that only they have the clout in the Syrian army for bringing about Bashar Assad’s removal and his replacement in Damascus by a provisional military regime.

Washington also hopes, according to our sources, that this gesture will give Moscow a strong incentive to lean hard on Tehran for concessions at the next round of its talk with the six world powers on June 13.

Neither Iran nor Moscow have promised the US anything of the sort, but the administration hopes Iran will start being forthcoming on its nuclear program after being permitted to assume a central role in Damascus.

There is less optimism outside administration circles and in Israel. They expect from Tehran nothing more at the next round of talks than token nuclear concessions, and none at all toward curtailing its work on a nuclear weapon.

However the Obama administration appears to have opted for this course, even though it is the first time since the outbreak of the Arab Revolt in December 2010 that the United States is willing to let go of a major Middle East crisis and allow its foremost Middle East rivals, Moscow and Tehran, to take charge.

DEBKAfile reported exclusively on May 31, that President Barack Obama had proposed to President Vladimir Putin the creation of a large force of 5,000 international monitors for Syria, most of them Russians, to safeguard Assad’s stock of biological and chemical weapons against falling into the hands of al Qaeda or Syrian rebels. This team consisting of thousands of Russian troops would be the operational arm of the future “contact group.”

As far as Israel is concerned, the plan has disastrous connotations. Instead of containing the spread of hostile Iranian influence in the region, as Obama promised Israel, he is opening for the door for Iran to extend its nfluence squarely in the countries neighboring on – and still at war with – Israel, while at the same time moving back from a focused effort to draw the sting of Iran’s nuclear bomb program.

Israel’s political and security tacticians never took into account that a consequence of the Syrian revolt would be the establishment of full-blown Iranian sway over Damascus in partnership with Russia. Indeed, for 15 months, they insisted that the Syrian uprising was proof of America’s success in breaking up the dangerous Tehran-Damascus-Hizballah axis.

June 7, 2012 | 5 Comments »

Subscribe to Israpundit Daily Digest

Leave a Reply

5 Comments / 5 Comments

  1. When U r in charge U have better chance to get what U want. When others r in charge U have no idea what U will get. Pr. O has definitely opted for the second proposition. Iran and Russia main goals are to create as much mess as possible for the West. China is so faraway that they are much less concerned.

  2. 5. a quick return to bullying and blundering all over the world, once the returns from the ballot boxes come in.

    If only he were actually bullying our enemies.

  3. As far as I can see, this is one situation Israel would do well stay out of.

    As long as Israel’s enemies are killing each other, it weakens them. I have no interest in seeing Assad or his enemies come out on top.

    I want them to keep on doing to each other what they have been doing and the best outcome is both sides lose.

  4. The proposal has won the blessing of the Obama administration, meaning its consent to letting the two powers that will dominate the contact group, Russia and Iran, determine the course and outcome of the Syrian crisis.

    Obama’s foreign policy agenda for the next five months consists of

    1. putting off as much as possible of EVERYTHING

    2. paying any price in taxpayer money and human suffering, to keep things from hitting the American press

    3. a US national defense composed almost entirely of spin-doctoring,

    4. a put on show of “US determination” during the last few weeks of the election season, highlighted by the release of the book on bin Laden’s assasination, and finally,

    5. a quick return to bullying and blundering all over the world, once the returns from the ballot boxes come in.

    By the time November rolls around, Iran should be able to go public with a facts-on-the-ground nuclear weapons program.