Obama’s Policy Towards Turkey is a Turkey

By Adam Turner, EMET

Recently, the Republic of Turkey barred both Israel, and the European Union, from participating in a NATO summit in Chicago on May 20-21.  Apparently, the Turks were miffed that the member states of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) were not invited, and they were also still “troubled” about Israel’s legitimate actions to defend its blockade of Hamas ruled Gaza from violently “peaceful,” pro-terrorist blockade runners on the ship Mavi Marmara, who were sponsored by Insani Yardim Vakfi (IHH), an Islamist Turkish group.  Many of that ship’s passengers were members of IHH, by the way, including some of those who were killed and injured in their attack on the Israeli commandos who boarded the vessel. Several had indicated a willingness to engage in martyrdom prior to the incident.

For some reason, President Obama and his Administration have granted Turkey the power to make decisions like these.  This is probably because President Obama has developed such a good personal relationship with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan.  In fact, Obama went so far as toname Erdogan as one of the five world leaders with whom he has the closest personal ties.  President Obama has also gone to Erdogan again and again for help in formulating U.S. policies in the Middle East and elsewhere.  Indeed, President Obama is so close to Erdogan that he even goes to him forparenting advice.  This is a big problem, considering the Islamist background and tendencies of Erdogan and his political party, The Justice and Development Party – in Turkish: Adalet ve Kalk?nma Partisi (AKP).

So what information do we have on President Obama’s New BFF (Best Friend Forever) and the regime he leads?  Erdogan is an authoritarian, democratically elected but non-democratic Islamist who is creating a religiously based totalitarian regime.  These days, Erdogan is increasingly cracking down on his domestic Turkish opponents.  Turkey has imprisonedat least 94 journalists for their reporting – the largest number of press imprisoned in the world even higher than communist China’s, which has a population over 17 times larger than Turkey.  The policies of the Islamist friendly government in Turkey have led to an explosion in honor killings of women.  In fact, once again, Turkey is number one worldwide when it comes to this dubious statistic.  The honor killing of gays, lesbians, etc. is also on the increase in the country.  Gay activists have complained that they get little sympathy from Erdogan’s AKP, “which has its roots in political Islam and is known for its socially conservative stance,” and that the police are disinclined to investigate these murders.  AKP-dominated Turkey continues to discriminate against religious minorities, both Muslim and non-Muslim alike.  This discrimination appears to be accelerating – in 2009, Turkey was placed on the “Watch List” of the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom, and it stayed there until 2012, when, in “an unprecedented move,” the bipartisan commission recommended that the State Department name Turkey to its annual list of “countries of particular concern,” marking “the first time a NATO ally has been designated as a nation whose government has engaged in, or tolerated, systematic and egregious violations of the universal right to freedom of religion and belief.”  Of course, there is also some anti-Semitism and violence towards religious Turkish minorities.  And, Turkey just wouldn’t be Turkey if there weren’t violence and discrimination against the ethnic minority group the Kurds.  Finally, the regime goes after its secular foes in the Turkish military.  The Turkish press has reported that one in five Turkish generals – who tend to be strong foes of political Islam and Erdogan – are currently serving jail sentences.

Even better than being an authoritarian, non-democratic Islamist , Prime Minister Erdogan is also openly hostile towards our interests and allies.  For example, in Syria, Turkey is currently directing our support to the radical Sunni fundamentalists within the opposition, rather than the more secular groups that we should wish to support.  In Cyprus, “Turkey continues its 40,000-strong troop occupation of a large part of the Republic of Cyprus — an EU and UN member state — despite numerous Security Council resolutions since its initial 1974 invasion calling for its immediate withdrawal.  Turkey does not comply with its legal obligations to Cyprus or to the EU and forcibly interferes with Cyprus’ rights in its exclusive economic zone of maritime jurisdiction.” In the Middle East, the Turkish AKP leadership is a recognized sponsor and enabler of terrorism. In Israel, the government is worried that the Turkish leadership might share Israeli intelligence secrets with the rogue and genocidal regime in Iran.  In the U.S. Congress, Turkey continues to whine and bluster about the U.S. recognizing the Ottoman Turkish genocide of Armenians in the early part of the 20thcentury.  (It also does that internationally too.)    In Iraq, Turkey continues to threaten the Kurds, who just so happen to be the most pro-American group in that nation.

This is not a comprehensive list, of course.  In addition, I should add that over just the last year, “Turkey has sided with Iran on the nuclear issue, held secret air force war games with China without first informing the Pentagon or NATO, threatened to initiate military action against Israel and Cyprus, and made anti-American rhetoric a staple of the Turkish ruling party’s proxy press.”  And best of all, the Turks are nowmeddling in the Balkans, but as we all know there is really no downside to that (aside from the occasional World War).

So why not put Turkey in charge of who gets invited to NATO events?

May 21, 2012 | 4 Comments »

Subscribe to Israpundit Daily Digest

Leave a Reply

4 Comments / 4 Comments

  1. @ babara:

    Turkey has absolutely no stategic value to Nato. Its geography is totally irrelevant to the defence of the west.

    Barbara, this is untrue. Turkey, and the Ottoman Empire before it, occupies essentially the same place as the former Eastern Roman Empire. For centuries, it even shared the same capital: the modern “Istanbul” is simply the Turkish form of “Constantinople”, named after Roman Emperor Constantine. It would take a real stretch of one’s imagination, to think that the geography of the Roman Empire, upon which Western Civilization rests, is “totally irrelevant to the defense of the West”.

    Turkey’s strategic position is inestimable: Turkey controls all naval passage between the Mediterranean Sea (through which much of the world’s shipping passes) and the Black Sea (where Russia’s warm-water fleet is located). It also borders on the former Soviet Union; and because of this, NATO has based missles and nuclear armaments there.

    A convincing argument COULD be raised about how AFGHANISTAN has no relevance to NATO, yet an immense NATO force has been stationed there since early in the George W. Bush Administration.

    Turkey is undeniably “European”. It is also unquestionably Muslim. In the eyes of many Israpunditers, this seems to represent a contradiction. None exists, though: Islam is not seriously at war with NATO, despite all the BS here. NATO is in the business of ruling the world: Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, Atheist, Jewish, Christian; it makes no difference: ALL are destined to become its minions, as the occupation of Afghanistan by NATO clearly demonstrates. The sooner folks here clear their heads of thinking “It ain’t so!”, the sooner they will be able to understand Washington’s policies toward Israel: They aren’t “Obama” policies; they aren’t “Muslim” policies; they’re a seamless continuation of the policies of George W. Bush, in many cases formulated and directed by the same people. They are NATO policies; and NATO is, simply put, Israel’s enemy.

    Concerning the Chicago NATO meeting, have no fear: It is all BS. DEBKA deftly described the decisions made there as so much “windowdressing”. Actual NATO decisions are made in Washington, not Chicago.

  2. @ leonard white:

    Laura is a very bright l-ass.

    Turkey has absolutely no stategic value to Nato. Its geography is totally irrelevant to the defence of the west.

    Turkey is a Eurasian country located mainly in the Anatolian peninsula in Asia Minor, with a small portion of its territory located in the Balkan region of Southeast Europe. Turkey borders eight countries: Bulgaria to the northwest; Greece to the west; To the northeast, Georgia, Armenia and the Nakhichevan exclave of Azerbaijan; Iran to the east; and Iraq and Syria to the southeast. Furthermore, it borders the Black Sea to the north; the Aegean and Marmara Seas to the west and the Mediterranean Sea to the south.

  3. @ Laura:

    Laura: Here is the Email address for NATO.

    webmaster@ndc.nato.int.

    Write to them, identify yourself, and make a formal request for the expulsion of the nation of Turkey from treaty membership.

    Allow a couple of weeks for processing and given your influence and leverage and I am sure Turkey will be promptly turfed out.

    GOOD LUCK.@ Laura: