PA wants to have its cake and eat it too

Many commentators on the right have said that the UN vote will change nothing. Israeli Ministers have even said they will consider it a breach of Oslo entitling Israel to its own unilateral moves.

I disagreed. First I asked why the Government of Israel is trying so hard to weaken support for the PA move. Obviously it doesn’t want to make its own unilateral move. Secondly I said that the PA will take the position that going to the UN for recognition isn’t a violation of Oslo and it doesn’t mean that negotiations have been abandonned. This article confirms that as their position. Ted Belman

‘Despite Hamas opposition, PA to go to UN September’
By KHALED ABU TOAMEH AND HERB KEINON, JPOST

The Palestinian Authority will ask the Security Council in September to recognize a Palestinian state as a full member of the UN, Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat said on Sunday.

Hamas, meanwhile, announced its opposition to the PA plan and said it had not been consulted about it.

“This is a legal, political and moral right,” Erekat said. “If the US uses the veto against our request, we will return to the UN with a request to upgrade the status of the Palestinian state to nonmember”.

Afterward, we will go back to the Security Council once and twice and three times to ask for full membership.”

“The negotiations and the application to the Security Council don’t contradict each other,” he explained. “We are going to the Security Council to consolidate the two-state solution. [Prime Minister Binyamin] Netanyahu is the one who has rejected the two-state solution and closed the door to negotiations by rejecting US President Barack Obama’s vision.”

Erekat said that Abbas would personally carry the membership request to the Security Council, in his capacity as “Palestinian president and chairman of the PLO Executive Committee.”

According to Erekat, September would mark the beginning of a move designed to gain full membership of a Palestinian state in the Security Council. “In September we will file a request for full membership with the Security Council and this will only be the beginning,” he said. “It won’t be a one-time attempt and it could recur every day.”

Palestinians were not interested in a confrontation with the US administration over the statehood bid, Erekat said.

“We will talk with the Americans about this,” he said. “We have nine members of the Security Council who have recognized us: India, Lebanon, South Africa, Gabon, Nigeria, Bosnia, Brazil, Russia and China. We will keep trying with the US until it changes its position.”

Ezat al-Risheq, a senior Damascusbased Hamas official, said that Abbas’s decision to go to the UN was an “individual step” that was not coordinated with other Palestinian factions.

“A Palestinian state should be extracted and not begged for,” Risheq said.

“The resistance is the only way for the Palestinians to extract their rights and liberate their land and establish their state.”

Israeli officials, meanwhile, said there has been no let-up in Jerusalem’s efforts to put together a “moral minority” of “important, democratic countries” to refrain from supporting the Palestinian bid in the General Assembly, where the Palestinians are expected to turn if they are thwarted by a US veto in the Security Council.

The thrust of the emphasis, the officials said, is Europe, with Netanyahu expected to make his second trip there this month, going in two weeks to Hungary and Poland.

Earlier this month Netanyahu went to Romania and Bulgaria, where he lobbied the governments there against supporting the PA move.

Depriving the PA of votes from key democracies in Europe would “take the teeth out” of any resolution, one official said, while acknowledging that the Palestinians have an automatic majority to get a resolution supporting statehood through the General Assembly.

One of the central arguments being used in efforts to convince countries not to support the move is to say that it will only make returning to the negotiation table more difficult, and will be a setback to the peace process.

In parallel with efforts to get states to refrain from supporting the move, the officials said Israel is continuing to work with Washington and others in the international community trying to find a formula for returning to the talks that would keep the Palestinians from going to the UN.

July 18, 2011 | 3 Comments »

Subscribe to Israpundit Daily Digest

Leave a Reply

3 Comments / 3 Comments

  1. I do not recognize the right of the Arab Entity to exist in Israel, period. Negotiations must begin at that fundamental understanding. Then the Arabs can tackle other issues, such as the right of return of Jewish refugees, and undivided Jerusalem as the capital of a contiguous Jewish state. These are minimalist demands, befitting a people who, it must be remembered, outnumber the Arabs in Israel by 2:1.

  2. email. [I am not at liberty to say who from.]

    But yesterday I spoke to some Palestinians who are not affiliated to Hamas whatsoever, but nevertheless opposed the plan for different reasons.

    First they told me that the PA is not ready for statehood, there is a lack of institutions and infrastructure. Furthermore corruption is still rampant, Fayad is as corrupt as Abu Mazen they argued.

    Second they said that unilateral moves are very dangerous because it could mean Israel will cut off ties with the PA and as a result they will be on their own (with the’ thieves’as they labeled the PA).

    They think the only solution is a negotiated one and more interesting, a solution should entail ‘a state within a state’. Sort of upgraded autonomy or even better a federation with Israel.

    They also said a viable Palestinian state can only exist in close cooperation with Israel. They mentioned the situation before 1993 when things were a lot better…………………