Trump: I’m not going to condemn Israel, it’s been through enough

T. Belman. Because of Trump’s remarks this week as to whether settlements are helpful or not to achieving peace. everyone has something to say about it. At the outset let me clarify “peace” is not the same as “a peace agreement.” The peace agreement that Obama sought so ardently, if achieved, would not have achieved peace. It was a prescription for war. Maintaining the status quo is more conducive to peace, primarily because Israel is in full control of Area C which includes the Jordan Valley. Accordingly, if Trump supports Israel’s retention of area C, it would certainly be conducive to peace and the settlements would not be an obstacle. In fact they would help solidify the peace. So the object of the exercise should be to achieve peace and not a peace agreement.

Furthermore Trump should not be so quick to seek the approval of the Arab world because they would demand too much. What ever he agrees to with Israel will alienate them but it won’t matter because they need the US and Israel, notwithstanding. The Palestinians are way down on their list of priorities.

Trump also said “there’s limited land left”, implying that that is the reason Israel should’t build new settlements. True, but sure that should lead Trump to broaden the discussion to include Jordan which has four times the land mass of Israel and a smaller population. A peace agreement and peace will only come about if Jordan is factored in.

In closing, I am very happy that he is getting a lot of advice and is considering his options.

President Trump praises Netanyahu but says ‘settlements won’t advance peace’.

By David Rosenberg, INN

On Friday, Israel Hayom published an interview with President Donald Trump, the first he has granted to an Israeli media outlet since taking office in January.

The interview was released just hours after President Trump dined with Israel Hayom owner and GOP donor Sheldon Adelson at the White House Thursday evening.

In the interview, the president, who is slated to meet with Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu next week, praised the Israeli premier, but said he felt the recent announcements of housing projects in Judea and Samaria did not improve the prospects for peace in the region.

“I know Israel very well,” said Trump, “and I respect it; I want to get peace between Israel and the Palestinians and even more than that.”

President Trump said on his relationship with Netanyahu: “We’ve always had [a good chemistry]. The Prime Minister is a good man who wants to do the right thing for Israel and he wants peace. He wants it fully. I’ve always liked him.”

But, Trump continued, he did not understand how expansion of Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria would promote peace.

“There is limited land left, and every time you take land for settlements, there’s less land left. I’m not someone who believes that advancing the settlements is good for peace. But we’re checking all the possibilities.”

Regarding America’s relationship with Israel, the president predicted that ties between the two countries would strengthen, claiming that the 2015 Iran nuclear deal negotiated by the Obama White House had brought relations with Israel to a nadir.

“We’ll have better relations with Israel. The agreement with Iran was a disaster for Israel, it’s unbelievable, both in terms of how it was negotiated and the way it was implemented. Everything about this deal is terrible. As a businessman I know how to tell a bad deal from a good deal. This deal is impossible to understand. I can’t understand it. And you can see how Iran is behaving: instead of thanking Obama, who was so biased in their favor, they acted arrogantly even before he left the White House. It’s a shame this deal was made.”

Trump also said despite his disagreement with Israel over the expansion of Jewish towns in Judea and Samaria, he would not condemn Israel.

“I don’t want to condemn Israel. Israel has a long history of condemnations and challenges. I don’t want to condemn Israel during my administration. I understand Israel very well and respect it very much. Israelis have gone through very difficult periods. I want peace between Israelis and Palestinians and even more than that. I think peace for Israel would be great for Israel, not just good.”

When asked whether he planned to fulfill his campaign pledge to relocate the US embassy to Jerusalem, the president said he was still considering the issue.

“I want Israel to behave sensibly during the peace process, that it should come after so many years. And maybe there will even be the chance for a bigger peace than just an Israeli-Palestinian [deal]. I want both sides to behave reasonably, and we’ll have better chances that way.

“I’m thinking about it. I’m learning the subject, and we’ll see what happens. It’s not an easy decision. It’s already been debated for years. No one didn’t want to make the decisions, and I’m thinking very seriously about it.”

President Trump reiterated his optimism regarding the prospects for a comprehensive Middle East peace, though he acknowledged that many of his own advisers have suggested such an achievement is impossible.

“No deal is good if it’s not good for both sides. Right now we’re in a process that’s lasted for years, decades. A lot of people think that it is impossible to do this [to reach a final status agreement], a lot of smart people around me say it is impossible to reach an agreement. I don’t agree with them. I think that it is possible to reach an agreement, and we need to reach an agreement.”

February 10, 2017 | 10 Comments » | 57 views

Subscribe to Israpundit Daily Digest

10 Comments / 10 Comments

  1. So another guy in the White House. Another big ego who thinks he can waive his magic wand and make the deal of all deals. Now we need to wait Trump out until he tires of trying.

    Hopefully he will stick to not condeming Israel and Israel will just build, build, build and build some more.

  2. Trump sounding more like Bush towards Israel. Friendly in tone.

    However it sounds like he will not move embassy.

    So he will be acting like a neutral to try and get a deal done. He is disappointing.

  3. I voted for him to solely to make liars out of the last 3 or 4 presidents who said they would move the embassy to Jerusalem to get the Jewish vote.
    He has to keep his promise, and he said that would be the first thing he did as president.
    Jordan is the palestinian state with the bulk of its population palestinian.
    That is the palestine for palestinians.
    Not gaza, not greater Israel.

  4. @ Bear Klein:
    It would appear that you are right.

    Here’s the actual interview:

    Why doesn’t he talk about illegal Arab Settlement, not to mention authorized new settlement? As with the British, only restrictions on Jews? Is this even even-handed-ness?
    That’s the problem with the TSS mentality. It assumes that the Pals are the indigenous people. They’re illegal immigrants from the Mandate period, most of them. Many of those who came in the 19th century came in response to the Jewish development and in the 18th century from Egypt in response to famine.

    This is an important link to forward to skeptics:

  5. @ Sebastien Zorn:
    Trump is not listening to those around him who know that the most any Israeli (even the left) would be willing to give up is not enough for the Arab “Palestinians” to agree to.

    He does not realize that the root of the conflict is that the Arabs do not agree to a Jewish State no matter the location of the borders.

    Trump is very disappointing. He is back to were he started when he campaigned that he will try get the ultimate deal. Then he got resistance from the true-Pro Israel so backed off.

    We will more as time goes on.

    Israel needs to do what Israel thinks what is in its best interests not what foreigners think.

  6. It seems that Trump has reneged from his promise, instead he now considers the embassy move as a REWARD if Israel “behaves”… worrisome.

  7. Sebastien Zorn Said:

    . Many of those who came in the 19th century came in response to the Jewish development


    They were mostly transferred by the Turkish Govt. from various parts of Turk-held Eastern Europe, as well as from as far away as Algeria and the Gulf.

Comments are closed.