When a number of soldiers refused to participate in the evictions of Jews from Hebron The pros and cons of such insubordination were discussed in an article on Netanyahu‘s reaction and one written by Aryeh Eldad. Many people took the trouble to comment. I myself called for insubordination or conscientious objection, if you will.
In fact I commented on Mass defection would bring the government to its knees
Personally I believe that when a government becomes illegitimate it should not be followed. Of course it is not always easy to discern when the line from legitimate to illegitimate has been crossed. Is it enough not to have the support of the people. Many argue that once elected, leaders are expected to lead and not follow public opinion. I argue, only to a point.
The issue of keeping or giving away Judea and Samaria is so fundamental to Judaism and Zionism that a government at odds with the people is not legitimate. Fundamental principals are what wars are fought over.
By: Steven Plaut, JEWISH PRESS
I suppose I should begin by explaining why I bothered to read the book The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins (Bantam, 2006). Dawkins is Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University, and a zealot with a mission: to wipe out religious belief of all sorts. The God Delusion is his call to arms.
My reading of the book was largely in response to a triple dare made by a friend, Dr. M., a true Zionist Israeli, an outspoken Jewish patriot, and someone who describes himself as a militant agnostic. Dr. M. has long found it incomprehensible â€“ indeed, a downright insult to his intelligence â€“ that a nice educated fella like myself does not share his staunch agnosticism.
Democracy and Equality
The complexes of Jewish legislators are beyond me.
The Israeli government decided to establish an administrative unit “to encourage those sectors that do not serve in the Israeli army to volunteer for civilian service.” The government chose its words carefully in the laundered announcement it made. It did not refer, heaven forbid, to “national service,” as thousands of religious Jewish girls have served in Israel for many years. Nor, heaven forbid, to “Arabs,” so as not to offend them. But the laundering did not help the Israeli ministers much.
Israeli Arab leaders hurriedly met and angrily rejected the idea that young Arabs could volunteer for civilian service. And the government had not spoken, heaven forbid, of obligatory service. But even volunteer service, within the framework of the State of Israel, was seen by the Arabs as “a distortion of national identity and a justification for discriminating against the Arab public.”
American Council for Kosovo documents 8 years of ethnic cleansing against Serbs
Â© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com
The cross that sat high atop St. Andrew the First-Called in Podujevo was torn down in one of many acts of vandalism designed to terrorize the Christian Serb community
WASHINGTON â€“ United Nations forces moved into Kosovo in 1999 to “stop genocide.”
But, according to a blistering new report from the American Council for Kosovo, U.N. troops have aided and abetted the deliberate, systematic and nearly complete ethnic cleansing of the mostly Christian Serb population by mostly Muslim ethnic Albanians.
“Every facet of the way of life of the Serbs of Kosovo is threatened by the new reality established since June 1999 under KFOR (the NATO Kosovo Force) and the U.N. and therefore the very existence of the Serbs there is threatened,” says the report “Hiding Genocide in Kosovo.”
By Arlene Kushner
A brief word about the issue of African refugees coming into Israel via Egypt, as I suspect this is something that’s making press in the US.
Some of those who have come — as I understand it, roughly 3,000 over time — have been kept here in Israel (where there is discussion as to what to do with them) and some have been turned back to Egypt. The situation is vastly complicated — far more complicated than would appear at first glance — and exceedingly painful.
In a nutshell, there is the feeling that we Jews here in Israel have a moral obligation to receive suffering refugees. And that perspective tugs at my own heart, without a doubt. It comes from the gut, in terms of who we are and how we are supposed to act.
WASHINGTON – Israeli officials warned the George W Bush administration that an invasion of Iraq would be destabilizing to the region and urged the United States instead to target Iran as the primary enemy, according to former Bush administration official Lawrence Wilkerson.
[..]After the Israeli government picked up the first signs of that intention, said Wilkerson, “The Israelis were telling us Iraq is not the enemy – Iran is the enemy.”
Wilkerson describes the Israeli message to the Bush administration in early 2002 as being, “If you are going to destabilize the balance of power, do it against the main enemy.”
The warning against an invasion of Iraq was “pervasive” in Israeli communications with the US administration, Wilkerson recalled. It was conveyed to the administration by a wide range of Israeli sources, including political figures, intelligence, and private citizens.
David Bedein, The Center for Near East Policy Research Ltd. has put forward a plan
The Bush administration has determined that â€“ in order to serve its perceived goals in the Middle East â€“ a Fatah-led Palestinian state should be established in Judea and Samaria. To that end, the US government has communicated to Israel the need to withdraw its presence from Judea, Samaria and eastern Jerusalem , and is committed to providing aid and military training to Fatah.
Already from its imperiled beginnings in May 1948 â€“ indeed, even before statehood â€“ Israel has sought desperately to negotiate with its enemies. Always, always â€“ it has preferred peace to war. Nonetheless, challenged by interminable Arab aggression and subversion, diplomacy has almost always failed Israel. This sad point is altogether incontestable. What real chance is there that, somehow, things can now be different?
Now, of course, Prime Minister Olmert continues to seek Israelâ€™s basic security in diplomacy. Although there is assuredly nothing wrong with such a conciliatory posture on its face, especially as Israel remains under constant pressure from Washington to negotiate, there is very good reason for skepticism. From Oslo to the so-called â€œRoad Map,â€ diplomacy over Israelâ€™s rights and obligations has always been a determinably asymmetrical process. â€œLand for nothing!â€ This manifestly pathetic phrase pretty much says it all.
Ironically, Israelâ€™s principal enemies remain candid. On some things they do not lie. On their intention to annihilate the Jewish state, they are sworn to truth.
1. The Foundation for Constitutional Democracy is an independent, non-profit, educational institution. Its primary goal is to promote Constitutional Democracy in Israel. The Foundation has drafted a Constitution for this purpose.
2. The Foundationâ€™s first practical objective is to empower the people by making legislators individually accountable to the voters in regional or multi-district elections.
3. The Foundationâ€™s constitutional method of analysis reveals how the flaws inherent in Israelâ€™s political and judicial institutions render it virtually impossible to solve Israelâ€™s domestic and international problems. By showing how these flaws may be corrected, the constitutional approach enables us to think constructively and offer people a positive goal.
My friend Nathan Shuster on behalf of IsraPundit interview with lawyer David Naggar, author of A Case for a Larger Israel
A Case for a Larger Israel is a most important primer on the antecedents of the Israel-Arab wars, not only for those who have become fuzzy on the origins of the “problem,” but also an extremely useful resource for those who are intimately involved. With a treasure trove of maps, charts, and historical and Quranic citations, the book is a fount of information. Unlike the solutions proposed over the last fifty years that appear to be a rehashing of what has failed many times before, David Naggar, a California advocate, dares to suggest a radical departure from the tried and tired. A Case for a Larger Israel may prove to be the true “road map” to Israel’s future prosperity, security and eventual peace.
Welcome Mr. Naggar to IsraPundit and congratulations on a most important contribution to the literature on the subject which even after almost sixty years continues to evade solution.
Thank you Nat.
You begin your book by revealing to the reader the simple device used by lawyers when their clients are suedâ€”the counter suit. Why do you think Israel never resorted to this courtroom counter-suit device when dealing with the Arabs?
Kinneret Lives is documentary which asks the question
“What happens to a beautiful girl whose world burns down one night and she wakes up 5 months later to a harsh reality?
The HOUR with George Stroumboulopolous covered the documentary after it appeared in the Toronto Jewish Film Festival in May
Bombings are part of life in Israel. Suicide bombers, rocket attacks — the threat is always there. We’ve got a woman who knows that first hand.
Kinneret Haya Boosany. It was 2001, and in one instant, her life was changed forever. A suicide bomber walked into her cafe.
After that bombing, Kinneret was pronounced clinically dead. She was revived and put into a coma for 5 months. 70 per cent of her body was burned, she lost sight in one eye, she was deaf in one ear, and missing half a lung.
The story of her recovery is told in a documentary called ‘Kinneret Lives.’
In the film, she makes video diaries about what she went through. They’re raw, sometimes hopeful and painful.
Spend the time to visit this site and to watch the videos and to be up lifted by the story.
[..] When we see former Deputy Chief Justice Mishael Cheshin becoming jealous of the Saudis and threatening to cut off the arm of the justice minister, and when the Supreme Court’s guardians argue that soon enough we’ll have to mourn the premature death of the judicial and ideological apple of their eyes â€“ it means that for them all hope has apparently been lost, and therefore they have no choice but to declare an all-out war against he who threatens to destroy the “judicial temple.”
But why is the judicial guard so furious? In fact, an objective examination of most of Friedmann’s moves so far makes it appear that alongside minor reforms, which are very far from shaking up the system, he indeed worked to advance several fundamental and highly important initiatives, although most of them are still at nascent stages.
Ovadya Yosef recently made a pronouncement that Israeli soldiers die in wars because they do not keep Shabbat or wear Tefilin. As usual Eli Yishai claimed that the statements had been taken out of context and that the Rabbi was speaking of biblical times, even though his statements were in the present tense. But let me provide some context.
Today the IDF has more religious soldiers and officers than it has ever had before. It has a higher proportion of soldiers who keep Shabbat and wear Tefilin than ever before. Today IDF soldiers are dying because of Ovadya Yosef.
Without Shas there would have been no Oslo Accords voted in and no Palestinian terrorist state. Without Shas, the entire Rabin-Peres reign of terror that has brought Israel to the brink of destruction and turned over a part of Israel to Arab terrorists would not be. Every Israeli soldier and civilian who has died since Oslo is a bloody stain on the hands of Ovadya Yosef, Shas and its voters. Every last one.
By Ted Belman
When Anatole Sharansky published A Case for Democracy in 2004, President Bush, and soon to be Secretary of State, Condeleeza Rice, bought into it hook, line and sinker, with the emphasis on “sinker”. With a religious faith in its power, promoting democracy became the central theme of US foreign policy.
As a result, the US lead with its chin in the Iraqi elections of ’05 and the Palestinian elections of ’06. In both case it received knockout blows from which it has yet to recover.
According to David Ignatius, In democracy’s name, the US has helped cede Iraq to Iran. Apparently,
By Rachel Neuwirth, Mich News (with the assistance of Salomon Benzimra)
This article was written one year ago. And now Hezbollah announced they will sue Israel in damages.
[..] Everyone recognized that Israel was the attacked party: the G8, the UN, the EU and even Saudi Arabia in their official statement just after July 12 were all unequivocal in identifying Hezbollah as the aggressor. And yet, at the Stockholm Conference, the only thing we heard from the â€œinternational communityâ€ was pledges to assist Lebanon in its reconstruction effort as if the country had suffered a natural disaster.Read more …
By Arlene Bridges Samuels
My blogging days â€“ and my work with Earl Cox and Israel Always â€“ are officially ending as I follow another path in a new role in my advocacy for Israel and her people. I recently became the first regional outreach director for AIPAC (the American Israel Public Affairs Committee) where it is now my job to build relationships with and encourage political action among pro-Israel Christians in the Southeast. It is exciting for me to be in this groundbreaking role. I recently moved to Atlanta to join AIPACâ€™s southeast region office.
By Ted Belman
The “peace process” is like an enormous ship traveling with great momentum to a predetermined destination. Nothing Israel can do will stop it or alter its course. While Israel continues to debate the details, the ship continues, inexorably.
Eight months after the US invasion of Iraq and the announcement of the Roadmap, Yossi Beilin, the Oslo architect, and Abed Rabbo, launched their peace proposal after two and one-half years of work. It was to be known as the Geneva Accords. It was sub-titled Draft Permanent Status Agreement
The plan, dubbed the Geneva Accord in tribute to the funding and support supplied by the Swiss Foreign Ministry, offers itself as a decisive solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, based on the plan drawn up by former U.S. president Bill Clinton after the breakdown in the July 2000 talks between former prime minister Ehud Barak and Yasser Arafat.
Fifty-eight former presidents, prime ministers, foreign ministers and other global leaders, among them former presidents Mikhail Gorbachev of the Soviet Union and F.W. de Klerk of South Africa, issued a statement expressing “strong support” for the plan. Other world leaders who voiced their backing included King Hassan III of Morocco, British Prime Minister Tony Blair, President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt and Clinton.
You probably haven’t heard much about the Holy Land Foundation trial in which CAIR is an unindicted co-conspirator. That’s because the MSM is hardly covering it.
The Washington Times reports today that the Justice Department (DOJ) is co-sponsoring a convention held by the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) in Chicago. U.S. Congressman Keith Ellison will also be the keynote speaker at this conference on September 1.
ISNA is an unindicted co-conspirator in the trial against the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF).
According to the Washington Times, DOJ’s acting deputy chief of the Voting Rights Division Mrs. Lorenzo-Giguere sent an email stating that the DOJ would be sending government lawyers to man a booth at the ISNA convention as an opportunity to reach a “very much discriminated against” group. The Washington Times also reports that DOJ spokesman Erik Ablin confirmed that DOJ participates in the annual convention. CONTINUE
Dr. Aaron Lerner Date: 29 August 2007
IMRA asked the following question this morning to an “Israeli Government Official”:
If Prime Minister Olmert develops some form of understanding of principles with PA head Mahmoud Abbas before the international conference will the Government vote on it before the international conference?
The “Israeli Government Official”, returned shortly thereafter with the following reply:
“There is no such plan at this point to bring it before an additional forum for further discussion.”
WASHINGTON – The Bush administration has notified Senator Richard Durbin of Illinois that it “can’t support” the bills intended to help states and funds divest from Iran and Sudan, Haaretz learned on Tuesday. In a letter sent to Durbin within the past four weeks, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury Department Kevin Fromer explains the reservations the administration has regarding these bills, among them, the fear that such legislation “could jeopardize the support of our allies for multilateral actions against the regimes in these countries.” Durbin introduced S. 831 – The Sudan Divestment Authorization Act – which is one of the bills the administration is asking Congress to take off the table. CONTINUE
[All the reasons offered do not satisfy me. They fail to offer any explanation of how it can hurt their efforts. TB]