Peloni: Once again, it is being proposed that Israel should TRUST Lebanon to contain or control Hezbollah. While this gambit would allow Israel and Washington to each save face, it belies the reality that Lebanon has been complicit in supporting Hezbollah for decades. This only way that Hezbollah can be ‘disarmed’ is to first see their masters in Iran fall from power, and thereby end the subsidies by which Hezbollah maintains its financial support. The advent of cheap drones menacing the world makes even the elimination of missiles not enough of a solution to protect the North. Lebanon must be freed of its Iranian masters, and instead, Washington has seen fit to allow Iran to raise significant revenue streams. Who do you think will receive the first check from the revitalized Iranian cophers? I think the answer to this question is quite clear
The interests of Lebanon and Israel align on the core issue of disarming Hezbollah.
Hussain Abdul-Hussain
Months ago, I argued that Israel had reformulated the traditional Arab peace proposal. The old formula of “land for peace” held that Israel would cede territory in exchange for Arab recognition and normalized ties. Israel has flipped the formula to “peace for land.” The Arabs would first make peace and disarm militias such as Hamas and Hezbollah, with Israeli territorial concessions to follow.

By Bingjiefu He – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0,
Trump announcing strikes on Iran, February 28 2026, Donald J. Trump, Public domain

Video captures Montreal shooting. Screengrab via Youtube



Screengrab via Youtube and AI
