Peloni: The High Court calls for a compromise, but compromising the authority of the elected govt is exactly what is at stake in this trial. In effect, they are requiring the govt assign themselves a limited authority or face the judges imposing something similar on them. Divesting ministerial authority from the ministers is not deliberating the law, it is setting legal precedent in which the Court would be limiting the power of the elected govt without any established legal basis to do so. Is the authority of the unelected High Court greater than the authority of the elected representative govt? By requesting Ben Gvir and Netanyahu compromise on this point, they are requesting them to agree that the answer to this question is ‘yes’ when they answer should instead be clearly stated as ‘no’.
Justice Minister, coalition members vow to ignore court ruling, says it has no authority to order firing ministers
| Published: April 16, 2026
After a ten-hour-long, stormy debate, Israel’s High Court did not issue a ruling on a petition to dismiss National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir over his alleged politicization of the police after a hearing on Wednesday.
Instead, the nine judges called on the government and Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara to find a compromise that would restrain the controversial minister, instead of taking the unprecedented step of forcing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to fire Ben Gvir.
Read more…