The Government of Israel wants “to be raped”. Landau

by Isi Leibler
December 27, 2007

Ted Belman
Haaretz and also the IPF both have asked the US to pressure Israel to yield. The good news is that they wouldn’t have to if they thought the political will was there in Israel to bend over. Thus Israel must be “raped” or forced to give in. Landau doesn’t speak for the GoI. He speaks only for some in the GoI.

In the course of a visit to Israel by US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, approximately 20 heads of the most senior Israeli think tanks and media leaders were invited by the American Ambassador to Israel, Richard Jones, to a dinner at his private residence to receive a confidential briefing from the Secretary of State. The event took place on September 10.

A bizarre exchange took place at this gathering between one of the participants and the Secretary of State. It was initially broadcast on Israel TV Channel 2 by Ehud Yaari, one of Israel’s most highly respected commentators, who had not attended the dinner but had verified the details with colleagues who were present. The public did not appreciate the seriousness of the incident because Yaari failed to disclose that the person involved was none other than Haaretz editor David Landau.

I have independently verified details of what transpired and in response to questioning by Yaari and in an interview with Gary Rosenblatt, the editor of the New York Jewish Week, Landau himself confirmed the veracity of the events outlined below. (see Haaretz editor urged Rice to ‘Rape’ Israel)

Following the briefing, Mr. Landau, who was seated adjacent to the Secretary of State, turned to Secretary Rice, and as he said to the Jewish Week, “I told [Rice] that it had always been my wet dream to address the Secretary of State” on how to act in relation to Israel.

Landau opened his remarks by referring to Israel as a “failed state” politically. He said that the only way Israel could be saved would be if the United States were to impose a settlement. Landau told Rice “I implore you” to intervene and added that the Government of Israel wanted “to be raped”.

Condoleezza Rice responded that whilst she appreciated the dilemmas facing Israel, the United States would never impose its views on the Jewish state in such a manner. Landau told the Jewish Week that the Secretary of State was completely unfazed by his remarks.

For the US Secretary of State to partake in such an exchange with the editor of a major Israeli newspaper is mind boggling. Whilst Ms. Rice rejected Landau’s entreaties for the United States to force Israel to act in what he perceived to be Israel’s best interest, there is little doubt that his remarks would have subsequently been widely aired in US State Department circles.

Anyone familiar with Israel’s diplomatic history will be aware that the worst fear of government after government was the prospect of the United States alone or in conjunction with another power, seeking to impose a settlement which would be to Israel’s political detriment or compromise its vital security interests.

By any benchmark, Landau’s behavior as an Israeli citizen would be deemed unacceptable. But it is surely unconscionable that the editor of one of Israel’s most influential newspapers, which also appears in an English and global internet version, could urge an American Secretary of State to “rape” his own government. If ever there was a crossing of every red line in terms of propriety, national integrity, and civic responsibility, this extraordinary intervention tops the bill. This is surely not behaviour befitting the editor of a major newspaper. Could one possibly visualize the head of a major European media outlet behaving in such a manner in relation to his country?

What is even more outrageous is that far from displaying remorse at his behaviour, Landau told the Jewish Week that “he had no regrets and that, on the contrary he was pleased, adding that he was later congratulated by several professors in the room who felt ‘I articulated what many Israelis feel’.”

On November 6, I wrote an op-ed in the Jerusalem Post sharply condemning Landau for what I considered to be a basic violation of the Israeli Press Council’s code of ethics (see Shame on Haaretz).

I related specifically to statements in which Mr. Landau had boasted that in order to promote the so called “peace agenda”, he had deliberately exploited his editorial authority to “soft pedal” acts of corruption by senior political leaders including Prime Minister Sharon and Prime Minister Olmert. Landau had also reiterated that he intended pursuing the same course of action in the future.

I also noted that Mr. Landau had instructed his staff not to respond to requests for corrections of demonstrable falsehoods published in his paper, if the source of the complaint was CAMERA, the American Jewish media watchdog organization that footnotes all its criticisms. Mr. Landau justified this on the grounds that CAMERA was a “McCarthyite” organization.

Although the Israel Press Council intervention on such issues is rare, I understand that it is investigating these apparent breaches of their code of ethics.

However this latest incident goes far beyond journalistic ethics. It involves a profound moral issue which touches upon the core of our dignity and self respect as a nation and cannot simply be dismissed as another example of post Zionism or infantile radicalism. Whereas left and right wing groups, to their discredit, have previously appealed to international public opinion to support their views against the policies of particular governments, there is a quantum leap from such action to a senior Israeli media personality appealing for intervention directly to a Secretary of State.

Of course, Landau is entitled to his personal opinions. But it is surely a staggering act of reckless arrogance and a reflection of utter contempt for the democratic process when the editor of Haaretz newspaper at such a venue to have passionately conveyed such views to the American Secretary of State at this most sensitive diplomatic juncture. I have no doubt that the vast majority of Israelis across the entire political spectrum would condemn his action as irresponsible and immoral.

Mr. Landau should apologize or resign.

December 27, 2007 | 5 Comments »

Subscribe to Israpundit Daily Digest

5 Comments / 5 Comments

  1. iday, December 28, 2007
    Ha’aretz Editor Is Trying to Get Olmert Raped

    ISL – Jerusalem

    Rape is in the air. First we reported the innovative research which proved scientifically, that Israeli soldiers are racist for not raping Arab women, and now we hear that the editor of Ha’aretz, David Landau is trying to arrange for Israel to get raped by the United States. Obviously, the editor’s words were taken out of context – no country can actually rape another one. We take it that Landau was trying to arrange for Israel’s leader, Prime Minister Olmert, to get raped by America’s leader, President Bush upon his approaching visit to Israel.
    As Daniel Pipes points out, such interference in the personal sex life of democratic leaders is unheard of, “Getting raped is an extremely private affair,” said Dr, Pipes, “And it is usually spontaneous – hardly the sort of thing that should be arranged, even if it is done by a true friend of Israel like Landau.”

    Ha’aretz Editor, David Landau, did not deny this request but he did explain that it is only for the good of the country, “Someone has to rape Olmert before it is too late,” explained Landau in his usual rational manner. Landau also added that several other cabinet members should get raped as well, “I asked that Livni, Barak, and Mofaz get raped too, if the President’s schedule permits it,” said Landau, who is still working on the list of individuals, organizations and sectors in Israel that have to be raped by America, “As long as President Bush is here we might as well have as many rapes as possible,” said Landau, who reiterated that it is for the good of the country, “Rape is good for you, everybody knows that,”said Landau, “In fact, I would get raped myself if I wasn’t allergic to it,” said the editor of Ha’aretz.

    Olmert said that he appreciates the efforts made by Israel’s best friends to improve the relationships between Israel and America. Olmert said that such a favor has to be returned, “Allergies notwithstanding, I have invited the editors of the New York Times, the Chicago Tribune and Newsweek magazine to join Bush in his visit to Israel in order to gang rape the editor of Ha’aretz, said Olmert, “David Landau is a great friend of Israel and also a personal favorite of mine and I know for a fact that he deserves to get raped,” said Olmert.

    Unfortunately, the long list of eager rape candidates may have to wait. President Bush has said

    that although he sincerely loves Israel and all of its leaders and cabinet ministers, he has a problem with using violence against his loved ones, “If I love someone I would much rather coddle them gently and make they sure they are safe and healthy and well-provided for,” said Bush who was quick to reassure Israel’s friends at Ha’aretz, “Of course that’s just my own idiosyncrasies speaking,” explained Bush, “To each his own is what I say and if some people prefer tough love than surely it is their right to do everything they can to get it for themselves or inflict it upon their loved ones.”

    Personally, I’m not sure that Israel will be able to handle so much tough love. The last time this happened, Clinton raped Rabin and we got saddled with their bastard love child – the Oslo Accords which we are still trying to kick out of our country.
    Maybe we could just go back to writing beautiful love poetry. I mean haven’t these people heard about the Song of Songs?

  2. “Mr. Landau should apologize or resign.”

    Landau be removed from his post as editor. Such comments are tantamount to a capital crime, since rape is a violent act against a weak victim. That Mr. Landau couched this statement in the form of a “wet dream” can only lead to the conclusion that he has confused his sexual proclivities with his position as editor of Ha’Aretz. Such confusion bespeaks the inability to know right from wrong in a legal and moral sense.

    That he acted on his fantasy in a public forum approaches the definition of a biblical abomination. It constitutes hate speech at the very least. Is calling for the death of Jews and their state any worse than calling for the death of Muslims? What would Israel do to a Jew for making such remarks about Muslims and their nation states? Let them do it to Landau! Reciprocity!

Comments are closed.