Muslim Culture for All to See

By Sha’i ben-Tekoa

One assumes that during World War II, visas to the United States for Germans, Italians and Japanese were not issued due to the war with these countries professing the ideologies of Nazism, Fascism and Japanese imperialism.

In this spirit, since Memri.org recently posted the words of a Muslim lecturer in Chicago explaining Islam’s goal as the extinguishing all other religions, the United States might also shut down immigration from Muslim states. The behavior of three Muslims on 24 February, two in Washington, DC, one in Lithuania, also provides justification for such a policy.

The first two, Representatives in Congress, seated in the chamber during President Trump’s State of the Union address, heckled him, which is the behavior of a fascist who cannot reason with opponents, so he tries try to keep the opponent from speaking and being heard.

The third Muslim that day was a Turk in an athletic competition who before the contest tried to grab the throat of his Jewish opponent, who reflexively tried to defend himself. The two of them had to be physically restrained by officials, with the Muslim still able to kick the Jew in the stomach.

In the first case,  the two Muslims acted in a way profoundly alien to American culture. I learned as a boy in public school that after an election, the losers must respect the desire of the winners, who are entitled to their opinions and views, and there is always the next election when the losers can try to defeat the other party at the polls.

The heckling of the President of the United States speaking in a time-honored national assembly not only disrespected him, but all the people who voted for him.

Do you remember, Hillary “Lady Macbeth” Clinton describing the opposition as “deplorable” people because they did not see things her way?

Both those Muslims in Congress were being faithful to the culture of their forebears who have no history as a society devoted to liberty and the right of individuals to their own beliefs and desires. Islam means submission, which is the antithesis of the American value of liberty. One of the most well-known symbols in the world is the Statue of Liberty in New York harbor; in Philadelphia the Liberty Bell as old as the American Revolution is on display; a revolution whose first violent rebels in Boston called themselves the Sons of Liberty.

This American philosophy of life is unknown in the culture of Representatives Ilhan Omar and Rashida Talib, and so it would be a rational decision of the Trump administration to close the door to people wanting to immigrate from officially Muslim countries.

Likewise, the behavior of that Turk in that sporting competition in Lithuania was that of a barbarian. A Muslim’s favorite form of violence is attacking people in their ordinary civilian lives, unarmed and unprepared to defend themselves. It is a tactic in which they take great pride. What, after all, is terrorism, if not homicidal aggression against defenseless people, for example, the hundreds of passengers in airliner skyjacked and flown in a skyscraper? This behavior is smiled upon by Muslims.

What, after all, was October 7 if not the same cruelty? A horde of “wild asses of men” pounced on people without weapons, listening to music, to torture and slaughter them.

When the Muslims in Teheran on November 4, 1979 representing their idea of a holy man, the Ayatollah Khomeini, invaded the U.S. Embassy compound and took the diplomats hostage, he was asked about this violation of diplomatic immunity, and he sneered back, “Who invented this law?” meaning, infidels did, not Believers in the One Correct Faith, and therefore it does not in Dar al-Islam.

The Iran hostage crisis then launched this writer into researching the history of this behavior and discovered this was hardly the first time Muslims had attacked embassies and consulates. On the contrary, many of the terror attacks in my book were against embassies and consulates; planting bombs in them; suicide drivers driving trucks loaded with bombs into them.

If you saw the video of that Turk lunging at Israel’s Mr. Ahavat Hashem Gordon, snarling at him in the weigh-in, you saw normal behavior in his culture, versus organized professional boxing at the highest level in the West where in the weigh-in prior to the fight, the two fighters stare and glare at each other, but that’s it.

What was on display in Lithuania was Muslim ethics. In my book, I note that what the West called PLO terror attacks, the PLO calls “military operations,” which ethic is also the rationale for the infamous Pay-for-Slay behavior of the Palestinian Authority, the old Fatah terror gang in disguise, who look upon the terrorists in Israeli prisons as “soldiers,” POWS, who are entitled to salaries support of their families when captured by the Zionists.  In sum, these barbarians have no understanding of what civilized people call terrorism.

Indeed, in Arafat’s infamous speech to the UN in 1974, he claimed that in the relationship with the Zionists, they are the terrorists. He defined a terrorist as one who fights for the wrong cause. One who fights for the right cause can use all available means. This is one reason why all peace efforts with these barbarians have failed.

The Jewish tradition teaches that Abraham’s first-son Ishmael, whose mother was not Semitic but Hamitic, became an armed robber, and that is someone who has no respect for the property of others. He covets something and has no inhibitions against taking it.

This is the essence of the so-called “Palestinian” war of national liberation which is their appetite for the Jews’ Biblical Promised Land that the Jews brought back to life. And to satisfy their hunger for Jewish wealth, they invented a nation that never was. Historical truth means nothing to them against their craving for what does not belong to them.

There is also deep significance in the existence of the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem that the Muslims built over the site of the Jews’ historic two temples. It symbolizes the relationship; Judaism defeated by Islam.

Likewise, the Muslims’ theft of the Cave of the Patriarchs and Matriarchs in Hevron, the “family plot” of the Jewish people, that the Muslims barred the Jews from entering. In Western civilization, every person is entitled to his or her religious faith, with Islam denying that value. Islam is a religion that cannot tolerate the existence of all other religions, in particular the faith of the Jews whose Torah they believe is false.

With such a mindset, a rational immigration policy in all liberal democracies should be the denying of immigration from the 56 Islamic states.

This is not racism. This is the rejection of their way of life. None of those 56 officially Islamic states is a liberal democracy. As during WWII, when people from Fascist and Nazi countries were not rewarded with visas to the United States, so Islam, which is the official ideology of these 56, is incompatible with life in America.

PHANTOM NATION: Inventing the “Palestinians” as the Obstacle to Peace is available at Amazon.com in hard cover or a Kindle ebook. His podcasts can be heard on www.phantom-nation.com.