T. Belman. Martin Sherman, in discussing the Jordan Option said:
“Some people, like my friend Ted Belman, see a very benign regime taking over. I hope he is right, I am not sure it will be so, that a future regime would be better disposed toward Israel. The main difference between the Jordan-Palestine paradigm and the Humanitarian Paradigm is that in the first case you will need a future regime to agree, with my solution I don’t need an agreement with an Arab collective, what I need is enough financial aid in order for them to qualify to be residents in other countries.”
Unfortunately Sherman has not informed himself as to why the new regime would be better disposed to my plan nor has he raised a dime toward compensated emmigration which he loosely estimates would require $300 Billion.
Nor has he even considered the possibility that the Trump administration might be disposed to putting Mudar Zahran in power precisely because he is amenable to my plan.
ByNiram Ferretti, L’Informale
Few, like Martin Sherman, posses such a deep insight into the Arab-Israeli, or Palestinian-Israeli conflict (the way it was rebranded after the Six Days war). Founder and CEO of the Israel Institute of Strategic Studies, ex Secretary General of the Tsomet Movement and author of the widely read column “Into the Fray”, Sherman is a staunch empiricist with a firm grip on reality.
Like many of those who see well but who are not listened enough, already in 1992 he predicted with extreme precision what was to happen in Gaza would Israel had left the Strip, as much as he was able to see exactly into the nature of Gonan Segev, the man whose political betrayal was essential to bring about the pernicious Oslo Accords.
Read more…