This Country Cannot Afford A Weak Supreme Court Decision On Internet Censorship
E. Rowell: Most of the coverage of this case has been discouraging at best. Finally, someone with common sense and deep knowledge of American history puts the case in context.
It is obviously un-American for the government to develop a ‘hit list’ of citizens to mute in the public square through secret pressure on communications monopolies.
By Joy Pullman, THE FEDERALIST 21 March 2024
NEW CIVIL LIBERTIES ALLIANCE / X
The Biden administration attempted to distract the Supreme Court from the voluminous evidence of federal abuse of Americans’ speech rights during oral arguments in Murthy v. Missouri Monday. It sounded like several justices followed the feds’ waving red flag.
“The government may not use coercive threats to suppress speech, but it is entitled to speak for itself by informing, persuading, or criticizing private speakers,” said Biden administration lawyer Brian Fletcher in his opening remarks. He and several justices asserted government speech prerogatives that would flip the Constitution upside down.


















