Peloni: Israel alone in the region is addressing the threat posed over minorities in the region, and while the Trump administration has spoken about the genocidal threat to the Christians in Africa, it has failed to support the plight of the Christians in Syria where they are sponsoring the Jihadist regime of minority slaughter by the US supported Jolani govt and allies. While the US can ill afford to be the world’s policeman, the fate of Christians in US supported Egypt and Syria and Lebanon are far more amenable to US threats regarding the fate of their Christian communities than Africa. While it need not be a choice between the plight of the Christians of the Middle East or those of Africa, there is a great deal of influence which the US could bring to bear in nations where US influence and funding is key to the stability and survivability of the relative regimes of the Middle East.
The burgeoning relationship between Somaliland and Israel proves that the Jewish state is not hated and isolated in the region, despite the neighboring cluster of authoritarian states insisting otherwise.
Ben Cohen | Jan 9, 2025
“Only Israel supports you.”
These words, delivered in a tone by turns mocking and threatening, were addressed by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan to the people of Iraqi Kurdistan following their September 2017 referendum on independence, in which 93% of participants voted in favor.
Sadly, Erdogan was correct.
It was only Israel that recognized the independence of Kurdistan. Some countries, fearful of antagonizing the regime in Ankara, fretted about process and consultation, urging the Kurds to forge a consensus with the very same states that have persecuted them so brutally. Reaction within the Middle East was even harsher, with one Palestinian leader—unfazed by the sheer hypocrisy of demanding statehood for his people while denying the same right to the Kurds—opining that “Kurdish independence would be a poisoned sword against the Arabs.”
Within days, Iraq’s armed forces forced the Kurdish leadership to cancel the results of the referendum, conquering 40% of the territory previously controlled by the Kurdistan Regional Government for good measure. A decade on, an independent Kurdish state on any of the contiguous territory across Iran, Iraq, Turkey and Syria inhabited by 25 million Kurds is nowhere on the horizon.
That union turned out to be decidedly unequal, with the Somalilanders in the north suffering from both political and economic discrimination. During the late 1980s, under the Somali dictator Siad Barre, Mogadishu’s policy in Somaliland became openly genocidal, with up to 200,000 members of its majority Isaaq ethnic group systematically slaughtered.
In 1991, during the civil war that ousted Siad Barre’s regime, Somaliland declared independence. While the country has been an admirable island of stability and decent governance amid the horror that unfolded in the rest of Somalia, it wasn’t until December 2025 that its independence was recognized by another country, in the form of Israel. As in Kurdistan, Israel is the only country in the world to have adopted this clear-sighted position.
Yet, as in Kurdistan, the same countries, led by Turkey, have denounced Israel’s recognition as they seek to crush the aspirations of the Somalilanders. Erdogan thundered that the Israeli decision was “illegitimate and unacceptable,” threatening that it would destabilize the surrounding region—and apparently unaware of the irony of opposing the independence of Somaliland by invoking the sovereign rights of a failed state like Somalia.
Last week, Israeli foreign minister Gideon Sa’ar traveled to Hargeisa, the capital of Somaliland, on a historic official visit. There is little doubt about the strategic value of an Israeli ally in an area that abuts the Red Sea, directly facing Yemen, where the Iran-backed Houthi rebels have waged a missile campaign targeting both Israel and international shipping heading towards the Suez Canal.
The burgeoning relationship between Israel and Somaliland also proves that Israel is not hated and isolated in the region, despite the neighboring cluster of authoritarian states insisting otherwise. Indeed, the criticism Israel has faced exposes the moral flimsiness of their campaign for the independence of the Palestinians and no one else.
The persistence of the periphery doctrine does not mean that the door to peace between Israel and the Arab states is closed. Over the last decade, the Abraham Accords forging normalization and peace between Israel, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Morocco, Sudan and, most recently, Kazakhstan, have emphatically demonstrated otherwise. Nor can the doctrine be uncomplicatedly invoked; for example, Israel now confronts a tension in its policy towards Syria, where its commitment to protect the Druze minority could well jar with its efforts to reach an agreement with the Sunni Islamist regime led by Ahmed al-Sharaa.
This is why the world’s democracies, led by the United States, should stop turning a blind eye toward the abuse of Middle Eastern minorities by Arab and Islamist rulers. If peace is to break out, and if prosperity is to spread, then the Middle East must be understood according to its reality—as a mosaic of indigenous minorities and nationalities, rather than an Arabo-Islamic region compelled to tolerate the presence of a Jewish state imposed from the outside.
In that spirit, the United States should join Israel in recognizing Somaliland’s rightful independence.
Ben Cohen is a senior analyst with the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD) and director of FDD’s rapid response outreach, specializing in global antisemitism, anti-Zionism and Middle East/European Union relations.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.