The New Replacement Theology

By Daniel Greenfield

In the Washington Post’s “On Faith” section, a story asks; ‘Judaism without God? Yes, say American atheists’. You can have Judaism without G-d, much as you can have an “On Faith” section without anything to have faith in.

It’s all a matter of definition. If you define Judaism by its covenantal document as a binding agreement between a people and the Creator of the universe, then an atheistic Judaism is a contradiction in terms. But if you define it as a cultural experience that calls us to social work and spirited debate, then it makes no real difference what you believe, so long as you volunteer at the Tikkun Olam soup kitchen.

What goes for Judaism, also goes for Christianity. The issue is not atheism, it’s the nature of religion and what it is and what it isn’t. Either religion is a specific belief in a deity accompanied by textual revelations, or it’s the Democratic party with its own pulpit.

The issue comes up every time the left tries to insist that its version of Christianity and Judaism, where the worst sin imaginable is not driving a hybrid is the right one, because it’s compassionate and spiritual. A spirituality that consists wholly of compassion and a compassion that consists wholly of following a left of center ideology while claiming that their grab bag of the welfare state, anti-war activism and environmentalism is highly spiritual.

Take Rabbi Arthur Ocean Waskow, please. Waskow, a left-wing activist and a member of a non-theistic movement, and his disciples, are usually found wherever Israel is demonized and the mass murder of Jews by Islamic fanatics is promoted with the beatific smile of the hazed out humanistic fanatic.

The paradox of a paragon of a humanistic un-religion making common cause with men who believe that their specific revelation entitles them to commit genocide is baffling. Or it would be if Waskow really was a humanist. In reality Waskow is a socialist with a pulpit. Even if it’s only an imaginary one.

Waskow’s idea of Judaism exists only as a metaphor for left of center ideology. The bible is only relevant to the extent that it can be used as a mythological connection to civil rights, nuclear war or global warming. The civil rights movement is just like Passover, nuclear war is just like Noah’s flood and Judaism becomes a lens for giving depth to left-wing causes. There is no god but Das Kapital and Waskow is its prophet.

This replacement theology often goes unremarked upon, even as it has become a base for Waskowites to call for Jewish genocide in the name of Jewish values.

The Waskowites, Rabbi Mordecai Kaplan’s bastard spawn, support Hamas, denounce Israel and join hate groups such as J-Street and Jewish Voice for Peace. Rabbi Phyllis Berman was affiliated with J-Street and a former member of Jewish Fast for Gaza. Rabbi Rebecca Alpert sits on the Rabbinic Cabinet of J Street and the Rabbinic Council of JVP.

And because there’s always something worse than worse, there’s Jewish Voice for Peace, an organization which supports a boycott of Israel and its destruction through a One State Solution. Its Rabbinic council includes Rabbi Rachel Barenblat of Velveteen Rabbi, Rabbi Brant Rosen, who can never decide if he hates Israel more than he hates the Republican party, and Rabbi Brian Walt, along with plenty of others.

As Rosh Hashana comes along, many of them will mount pulpits to explain why Israel is the enemy and why it must be destroyed in the name of Jewish values. They won’t say it in quite so many words, they will dwell on checkpoints and blockades and bring up apartheid and the civil rights movement. They will hardly mention Hamas, except to sigh that it hasn’t chosen the path of non-violent resistance, but that won’t stop them from supporting its goals anyway.

Rabbi Mordecai Kaplan certainly did not mean to found a movement of genocidal apologists and activists. In 1958, at the Rabbinical Assembly of America, he sounded positively hawkish as he warned that Israel might be becoming the Czechoslovakia of this era.

He warned that Western countries would scapegoat Israel through a “futile policy of appeasing Arab nationalism” and that Zionism was the force best qualified to “reconstitute the continuity, spirituality and structure of Jewish life.”

Could he have foreseen that Israel would become a scapegoat within his very own movement, which would view Zionism as its sworn enemy? Kaplan sought a larger Jewish unity through Israel, but his divisive disciples are only interested in unity with the agenda of the far left and serve as the public relations arm of the murderers of the Jewish people.

Where Kaplan had envisioned a Jewish rebirth, his movement instead became another vector for the left’s replacement theology, hijacking it as thoroughly as its Muslim allies were hijacking planes. It has spawned rabbis whose only religion is the left, whose only god is the left and whose only scripture is the works of the left.

It is entirely possible to be an atheist or a humanist and support Israel– but what is not possible, is using left wing ideology as your scripture and being anything other than an enemy of Israel and the Jewish people. The Waskows, Alperts, Bermans and Barenblats prove that.

It’s an old lesson taught by the Jewish Communists who cheered pogroms as the will of the oppressed peasants and workers, who served the Bolshevik takeover and lined up to turn synagogues into cultural centers and send Rabbis and Zionists to the gulags– only to eventually end up there themselves when their red masters no longer had any use for them.

As Lenin wrote; “Jewish national culture is the slogan of the rabbis and the bourgeoisie, the slogan of our enemies.”

“Whoever, directly or indirectly, puts forward the slogan of Jewish “national culture” is (whatever his good intentions may be) an enemy of the proletariat… he is an accomplice of the rabbis and the bourgeoisie.

On the other hand, those Jewish Marxists who mingle with the Russian, Lithuanian, Ukrainian and other workers in international Marxist organisations, and make their contribution… towards creating the international culture of the working-class movement… uphold the best traditions of Jewry by fighting the slogan of “national culture”.”

This position is still virtually indistinguishable from that of the Jewish left on Israel today. The Jewish nation is the enemy of the proletariat of “brown people” and the accomplice of extremist Rabbis and the middle-class. Only those Jews who join in an international working class movement uphold the “best traditions of Jewry” as determined by V.I. Lenin.

The modern Jewish left uses “tribalism” or “ethnonationalism” in place of Lenin’s “separatism” and “national culture”. It uses “materialism” in place of the “bourgeoisie” and “solidarity” in place of the “proletariat”, but the “best traditions of Jewry” slogan remains unchanged.

What are the best traditions of Judaism? We have the Lenin and Waskow interpretation. The one that says the best tradition of Judaism is to destroy it, to boycott Israel, join hands with the murderers of Jews and make war on the Jewish people. Anyone who wants to see where that interpretation leads can take a tour of the gulags, where the Yevesktsia’s own members ended up, after they were done collaborating in the Communist genocide of Russian Jews. Or they can take a tour of J Street’s offices.

The ideological space between them isn’t that great. Listen to a JVP speech and you hear echoes of a Yevsektsia (Jewish Section) member ranting about Zionism chauvinism and outmoded religious fanaticism, and the rise of a new generation of Jewish youth committed to the struggle for the working class.

The end of that ideology is a retired gentleman whom I met, with a Jewish last name, who was a former member of the Soviet military establishment, and spoke proudly of training suicide bombers. He was rather disappointed in his grandchildren for moving to Israel, and thought that young people today just don’t have the same principles that they once used to when he was a young man. He would have fit in perfectly at Jewish Voice for Peace.

On the other end of the spectrum is Rosh Hashana, the beginning of a new year. To much of the Jewish left, it is a mere cultural event, or a chance to reflect on the traditions of social justice. But though it is a new year, it is not actually the first month of the calendar. That honor belongs to Nissan, the month of the Jewish exodus from Egypt.

Even within the Jewish calendar, the peculiar separatism of the Jews places the month of the redemption from Egypt as its start, recognizing that there is no Jewish peoplehood without the exodus. Rosh Hashana is the beginning of a personal and communal new year, but the era of the Jewish people always begins with their national liberation and the beginning of a national covenant with G-d.

This is not a metaphor for the civil rights movement or the oppressed farm workers of Belize or any of the other nonsense that the replacement theology of the left tries to jam in. Their old shell game of covering everything up and then replacing it with a trojan horse that has nothing but left wing ideology inside doesn’t work here. The Jewish people begin here in the trackless desert, in the sacks of unleavened dough and the long journey to the promised land. Not an idea of it, but the reality of it.

Abstraction is the left’s game, it turns everything into a metaphor, removes the context, replaces it and dares you to identify whether you’re drinking coffee or crystals. But Jewish history is very much a concrete thing. As is Jewish identity. It is simply the history of a people. Jewish civilization is not about working class solidarity or the highest ethical traditions, it is the sum total of our achievements and failures. Our theology is the way that our history has paralleled our relationship with our G-d.

This is who we are. This is how we have survived. The left may try to replace us, but it can never succeed no matter how many collaborators it recruits and how many warped ideas it puts forward.

Lenin was right. Jewish national culture was the slogan of his enemies. And we are his enemies. As we are the enemies of the Waskows. The old Cain and Abel struggle has never ended. But what the Cains always forget is that while they are throttling Abel, Seth will come to take his place. The Cains of the left may think that they have their hands around our throat, only to rise baffled from the corpse to see that the Jewish people still live.

The Yevsekstias and Kapos did their damnedest, only to turn around and witness the rise of Israel. Their spiritual descendants are now desperately hammering on Israel, venting their full fury on the Jewish state. But even if Israel is destroyed, the Jewish people will still go on. And the left will not.

September 27, 2011 | 18 Comments »

Subscribe to Israpundit Daily Digest

Leave a Reply

18 Comments / 18 Comments

  1. an atheistic Judaism is a contradiction in terms.

    says the fanatical Greenfield!

    But what of the person who is an atheist?

    How is that person goping to fight for Israel? And if a Jew no longer believes then should he just hang up his boots and allow the religious Jews to fight for Israel? while he goes to the seaside?

    the positions of religious fanatic Greenfield are absurd when you stop and think on it.

  2. Why did greenfield not supply the full quote and instead pull a few sentences out of the whole? The whole is much larger.

    It would require much more study to understand this. Lenin was hopelessly confused and quite reactionary on the national question, and on the issue of Zionism, and I think he was so until his death.

    As indeed was Marx towards Zionism and also towards the national issue.

    This did enormous damage which persists into the present day. The present day left movements are all totally opposed to Israel and they have picked up these reactionary positions.

    Marx was also a fighter for Jewish rights and for total opposition to the anti-Semitism of Bakunin and others. That is hidden by Greenfield. So I reject the charges of antisemitism, and see them as absurd, otherwise how come that the bolsheviks made antisemitism a capital offence.

    My disagreement with Greenfield and with Israpundit is that they take a non-historical position on this (their method is non-historical) because history did not stop in 1923.

    I maintain that by the 1930s Trotsky had become a Zionist, and a Zionist from the perspective of being a revolutionary socialist.

    I have written on this before and nobody, but nobody, has challenged my work.

    But Greenfield does not want to know.

    Greenfield is a servant of capitalism and this dwarfs Greenfield as a Jew. So Greenfield and others want desperately to forget about the political developments of Trotsky.

    As indeed does this anti-Semitic “Left” of today. They also hide the major developments that Leon Trotsky made, and that Trotsky had become a Zionist by the 1930s

  3. For Felix!!! 🙂

    V. I. Lenin
    CRITICAL REMARKS
    ON THE
    NATIONAL QUESTION

    Written in October-December 1913
    Published in 1913 in the journal
    Prosveshcheniye Nos. 10, 11, and 12
    Signed: N. Lenin

    Published according to
    the journal text

    From V. I. Lenin, Collected Works, 4th English Edition,
    Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1964,

    Vol. 20, pp. 17-51.

    Translated from the Russian by
    Bernard Isaacs and Joe Fineberg
    Edited by Julius Katzer

    The same applies to the most oppressed and persecuted nation — the Jews. Jewish national culture is the slogan of the rabbis and the bourgeoisie, the slogan of our enemies. But there are other elements in Jewish culture and in Jewish history as a whole. Of the ten and a half million Jews in the world, somewhat over a half live in Galicia and Russia, backward and semi-barbarous countries, where the Jews are forcibly kept in the status of a caste. The other half lives in the civilised world, and there the Jews do not live as a segregated caste. There the great world-progressive features of Jewish culture stand clearly revealed: its internationalism, its identification with the advanced movements of the epoch (the percentage of Jews in the democratic and proletarian movements is everywhere higher than the percentage of Jews among the population).

    Whoever, directly or indirectly, puts forward the slogan of Jewish “national culture” is (whatever his good intentions may be) an enemy of the proletariat, a supporter of all that is outmoded and connected with caste among the Jewish people; he is an accomplice of the rabbis and the bourgeoisie. On the other hand, those Jewish Marxists who mingle with the Russian, Lithuanian, Ukrainian and other workers in international Marxist organisations, and make their contribution (both in Russian and in Yiddish) towards creating the international culture of the working-class movement — those Jews, despite the separatism of the Bund, uphold the best traditions of Jewry by fighting the slogan of “national culture”.

    Bourgeois nationalism and proletarian internationalism — these are the two irreconcilably hostile slogans that correspond to the two great class camps throughout the capitalist world, and express the two policies (nay, the two world outlooks) in the national question. In advocating the slogan of national culture and building up on it an entire plan and practical programme of what they call “cultural-national autonomy”, the Bundists are in effect instruments of bourgeois nationalism among the workers.

  4. As Lenin wrote; “Jewish national culture is the slogan of the rabbis and the bourgeoisie, the slogan of our enemies.”

    “Whoever, directly or indirectly, puts forward the slogan of Jewish “national culture” is (whatever his good intentions may be) an enemy of the proletariat… he is an accomplice of the rabbis and the bourgeoisie.

    On the other hand, those Jewish Marxists who mingle with the Russian, Lithuanian, Ukrainian and other workers in international Marxist organisations, and make their contribution… towards creating the international culture of the working-class movement… uphold the best traditions of Jewry by fighting the slogan of “national culture”.”

    I need to know the source of this quote. Greenfield does not give it. Why would Greenfield not provide the source for such a serious statement by Lenin.

    If Lenin did write or say this it is tripe, total and complete tripe.

    And very reactionary.

    If lenin wrote that then it is in complete conflict with other things he wrote in his life, and above all with the developments in theory made by Trotsky in “literature and Revolution” in which Trotsky argued against the Stalinists maintaining that there is no such thing as “working class culture”.

    The whole point about the working class is that the working class does not possess a culture, it possesses nothing, especially not a culture.

    The culture of the working class is the culture of the bourgeoisie, or possessing class, which rules over it, and which controls the means and methods of promoting its (bourgeois) culture

    So if Ted can get the source of this quote from Greenfield then we may get closer to understanding what the hell is going on here

  5. YAMIT wishes Klal Yisrael a sweet, productive and peaceful year.

    Dip Your Apple – Fountainheads Rosh Hashanah

    Lyrics by Ben R.:

    Tekiyah… Shvarim Truah
    Tekiyah… Shvarim Truah (shofar sounds)

    A new year rising
    A new beginning
    Lift your head up
    Turn yourself ’round
    The world is spinning

    Feel the magic
    Of a new day
    Open your heart
    To a fresh start
    Send your fears away

    You’ve made mistakes
    You feel it
    You got what it takes
    Believe it

    Any wrong can be made right
    Just forgive, you need not fight
    Shana Tova Umetuka (A sweet and happy New Year)
    It’s Rosh Hashanah

    Shanana nana, Tova
    Ume Ume Tuka
    Dip your apple in the honey
    It’s Rosh Hashanah

    So many new hopes
    Waiting to find you
    Open your eyes
    The dreams you prize
    Are all around you

    The smiles are hiding
    No use in guessing
    Make up your mind
    Go out and find
    Life’s simple blessings

    This is your time
    You feel it
    How sweet it is
    Believe it

    Any wrong can be made right
    Just forgive, you need not fight
    Shana Tova Umetuka
    It’s Rosh Hashanah

    Shanana nana, Tova
    Ume Ume Tuka
    Dip your apple in the honey
    On Rosh Hashanah

    Shanana nana, Tova
    Ume Ume Tuka
    Hear the sounds of jubilation
    This Rosh Hashanah

    Yehi Ratzon She-niye Le (May we be…)
    Rosh, Lo Zanav (…a head, not a tail)
    Sweeten life for those around us
    With joy and love

    Avinu Malkeinu
    Chanenu V’anenu
    Hear our prayer ‘O Lord this hour
    Inscribe us in the Book of Life!

    Aneinu, Aneinu (answer us)
    Aneinu, Aneinu
    Aneinu, Aneinu
    Aneinu, Shana Tova!

    Shanana nana, Tova
    Ume Ume Tuka
    Dip your apple in the honey
    On Rosh Hashanah

    Shanana nana, Tova
    Ume Ume Tuka
    Hear the sounds of jubilation
    It’s Rosh Hashanah

    Sh’echiyanu | Give us life Lord
    v’kiyimanu | And sustain us
    v’higiyanu | Oh deliver us | To salvation

    Sh’echiyanu | Give us life Lord
    v’kiyimanu | And sustain us
    v’higiyanu | Oh deliver us | To salvation

    In this New Year
    On Rosh Hashanah
    Make your loved ones smile
    This Rosh Hashanah

    Open your hearts to one another
    This Rosh Hashanah
    And begin life anew
    This Rosh Hashanah!

  6. I too view the Jews as a people first. If I had to choose between a secular Jew or a religious Jew I would probably choose the secular. The reason is quite simple. The religious are stuck in a rut. This might seem contradictory as I am viewed as religious by those who have been on my journey with me. However, I am not old school. I change with the times. What may have been relevant 3000 years ago may not be relevant today. However the 10 commandments is still relevant. We are a motley crew.

  7. While it is true that we are both secular, we differ on how we look at religion. I agree with Greenfield. I am a nationalist Jew. The Jewish people are my people. There three thousand year journey is my journey. The exodus, the war with the Greeks, the war with the Romans, the hundreds of years of Christian persecution, the inquisition and the holocaust all happened to my people, to me. That is my identity. It is not a universalist identity. I am loyal to my people and not the proletariat.

  8. warmonger says:
    September 27, 2011 at 7:03 pm

    I was told recently by someone at my gogue…

    The “War of Gogue and My Gogue” suddenly makes sense.

    So I said to my Rabbi I smoke I drink and I swear…in moderation of coarse!

    Surely you meant to say “in coarse moderation”. 😉

  9. Bottom line. G-d gave the 10 commandments to Moses. I was told recently by someone at my gogue that religion is individual so therefore that would make me religious and I should behave accordingly. I thought to myself BULLSHIT. The athiests are allowed to have all the fun and us so called religious ones are suppose to just pray and keep bailing them out?? BULLSHIT!! So I said to my Rabbi I smoke I drink and I swear…in moderation of coarse!

  10. “Trotsky’s relations with his parents remained hostile, but during his years of exile they would go to visit him. His mother died in 1910 at the age of sixty. When the October Revolution came, Trotsky’s father was a relatively wealthy man, only to be ruined by the revolution. Yet his son would not come to his aid, commenting that “my father has no shoes and with so many people around who have no shoes, how could I possible request shoes for my father?” Deserted by his son, he was forced to fend for himself in his old age. When his father died and requested to be buried with a Jewish burial, Trotsky refused to bury him in the Jewish cemetery, instead had him buried in the garden of his house. This has been widely regarded as a clear action by Trotsky to openly exhibit his disdain for his Jewish heritage”

    NICE GUY 🙂

  11. It is related that the chief Rabbi of Moscow, Rabbi Jacob Maze, once appeared before Trotsky to plead on the behalf of the Russian Jews. Trotsky answered him, as he had done on various occasions, that he was a Communist and did not consider himself a Jew. To this Rabbi Maze replied: “Trotsky makes the revolutions, and the Bronsteins pay the bills.”

  12. What is the political programme for Israel that Greenfield promotes?

    What is the political programme for Israel that 4international promotes?

    If you cannot answer that truthfully do keep your poison out of it!

  13. Ted

    They do not stand for the dictatorship of the proletariat. Show me that. prove that.
    The whole thing by Greenfield is pure transendental bullshit you know!
    and it is trying to deny our defence of Israel. That is you and me Ted.

    greenfield stinks!

    It is an attack also on people like you and me Ted who do not believe that there is any supernatural

  14. Email rec’d

    They don’t even get “Tikun Olam” right. As the old joke goes, that ain’t but half a phrase. The whole phrase is “tikun olam bmalkhut Sha” dai” — “Rectification of the world by means of the Kingdom of God.” Try replacing that with “Rectification of the world by means of the Dictatorship of the Proletariat.” But that would be telling the truth about themselves and their program and that they never do.