Arlene Kushner | February 3, 2026
Iranian Airborne Cruise Missile (Photo by Tasnim News Agency, CC BY 4.0, Wikipedia)
This title is not a joke: it is a monumentally difficult task as matters now stand.
One of the matters that weighs heavily on the minds of most of us here in Israel is the question of whether Trump will in the end attack Iran or simply head towards negotiations. I certainly do not have the answer. Frankly, I suspect that Trump does not have the answer yet.
I have previously written about the prevailing attitude among Israelis: We know Iran must be taken down, but understand that if Trump does attack, Iranian ballistic missiles are likely to be launched in our direction, and we will be headed for our shelters.
Not a pleasant prospect, but a situation well-worth enduring if the net result is the end of the consummately evil regime in Iran. This would radically change the situation in the Middle East.
Our defense arsenal has been bolstered, and a handful of nations have said they would participate in taking down Iranian missiles before they reached Israeli airspace. But protection is not 100%.
~~~~~~~~~~
Daily, we are barraged with often-conflicting reports: Trump will likely attack; the attack will be a moderate one; the attack would have the goal of bringing down the regime; Trump is leaning towards negotiations; Israel will join the US in the attack on Iran; the US declares that its offer to negotiate is serious and not just a ruse before an attack takes place.
What may well happen is that Trump will try to negotiate a deal – as we know he prefers negotiations, and then, finding the Iranians not sufficiently forthcoming with regard to concessions, decide to attack.
Trump said, just recently, that “We have ships heading to Iran right now, big ones … and we have talks going on with Iran. We’ll see how it works out.”
https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-885324
The president has referred to a “massive armada” of weapons poised near Iran; on at least one occasion he has reinforced the number of armaments in the vicinity of Iran. Thus, we know that should he decide to attack, serious weaponry is in place. And, of course, Iran knows it as well.
~~~~~~~~~~
As I write, indications are that Trump is looking towards negotiations. US Envoy Steve Witkoff is scheduled to meet with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi (pictured) on Friday, reportedly in Istanbul.
https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-885324
This would be an exploratory meeting, in order to determine whether negotiations are possible.
Abbas Araghchi. Photo by Tasnim News Agency, CC BY 4.0, Wikipedia
Efforts to facilitate this meeting were made by Turkey, Egypt and Qatar, and we should not ignore the political orientation of these nations. According to some reports, they were pushing for that meeting to take place in Ankara, Turkey. As I write, I do not have clarity as to where it will take place.
The meeting may not be face-to-face but rather conducted via go-betweens.
Senior officials from Qatar, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Oman, and Turkey will join the talks, as will Jared Kushner.
~~~~~~~~~~
Iran has actually expressed an eagerness for negotiations. Its messages have been quite bellicose; but this is an indication not of strength, but the fear they harbor of a major attack by the US, which would do them enormous damage.
They also fear that a military attack might bring the demonstrators back into the streets in numbers that would bring down the regime. That regime is, by all indications, the weakest it has been since taking over Iran in 1979.
“In high-level meetings, officials told Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei that public anger over last month’s crackdown, the bloodiest since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, has reached a point where fear is no longer a deterrent…”
https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-885365
Negotiations provide a means for Iran to stave off these threats or at least buy time.
~~~~~~~~~~
There are significant reasons for not negotiating with Iran.
The first is that this regime lies and cheats. We are talking about a jihadist regime operating from a religious ideology. Nothing as simple as a signed document will deter them from attempting to achieve their goals, which are to spread sharia law throughout the world, and to totally eliminate Israel because Jewish sovereignty in the Middle East is an affront to Allah.
See Yonoson Rosenblum on this. He cites the brilliant orientalist Bernard Lewis, z”l (pictured), who took the time to research Khomeini’s speeches.
https://mishpacha.com/the-mullahs-will-never-abandon-their-goal/
Bernard Lewis. Screengrab via Youtube
A negotiated settlement might delay the pursuit of their goals, but it will not stop them. The Iranian regime is without honor in the Western sense that we understand it: honor founded on the integrity of a negotiated settlement. For them, honor comes with advancing their goals by whatever means.
~~~~~~~~~~
The second reason not to negotiate with Iran concerns the issues that would be open for discussion. This matter is critical.
Iranian officials indicate they are open only to negotiations on development of nuclear weapons.
Speaking with CNN on Sunday, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that he believed an agreement regarding Iran’s nuclear development could be reached quickly. He emphasized that talks would focus only on Iran’s nuclear program and not on curbing its ballistic missile program or support for proxy terror groups.
“Let’s not talk about impossible things,” he said, in response to a question on those matters by CNN. “And not lose the opportunity to achieve a fair and equitable deal to ensure no nuclear weapons.”
It should be understood that Iran has never conceded that it was working towards the development of a nuclear weapon. The claim, fallacious on the face of it, has always been that they were doing nuclear development for peaceful purposes.
The fact that they surreptitiously enriched uranium to a level not needed for peaceful purposes put the lie to this claim.
It also provides significant proof of the fact that agreements with them cannot be trusted: they exceeded the level of enrichment permitted by the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) of 2015, negotiated by Obama.
https://www.inss.org.il/publication/irans-nuclear-violations-jcpoa-and-beyond/
Trump, understanding that this was a bad deal, withdrew from the Plan during his first term and reinstated sanctions on Iran.
~~~~~~~~~~
It is possible that the Iranians plan on handling these negotiations the same way they did in 2015: They would seek a deal that did not permit them to develop nuclear weapons but gave them the right to use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. Then quietly, over time, they would continue to pursue the goal of nuclear weapon development.
Alaeddin Boroujerdi, a member of the Iranian parliament, said on Monday that Iran is not open to negotiations regarding its nuclear activities or missile capabilities.
Nuclear activities? Boroujerdi refers to “peaceful nuclear knowledge”, which he says along with “missile and drone capabilities, are red lines of the Islamic Republic and are not open to negotiation.”
https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-885324
~~~~~~~~~~
I share here an observation from Jonathan Tobin, editor of JNS (emphasis added):
“Whatever else was on his agenda or that of his voters, it is…true that the second Trump administration was not summoned into existence to re-enact the failed foreign policy of former President Barack Obama. And that’s the main thing for the president and his team to remember as they engage in negotiations this week with Iran.”
https://www.jns.org/trump-shouldnt-fall-into-the-iran-negotiations-trap/
~~~~~~~~~~
Trump does intend to make one bottom-line demand in addition to halting nuclear weapon development: there is to be no more killing of protesters.
But it would be terribly short-sighted to count even on this. Trump had boasted that he saved the lives of 800 protesters when he received a message from the regime that they had halted plans to execute demonstrators. But the regime went on to murder an incredible 35,000.
~~~~~~~~~~
Over the weekend, Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir made a secret visit to Washington where he met with Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine (pictured) and other top-level officials.
Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir. By Eytan2009 – Own work, CC0, Wikipedia [Cropped]
He was there to discuss projected outcomes of the current standoff between the US and Iran and to enhance coordination at all levels – that coordination is at an all-time high. Israel has provided a comprehensive take on possible problems and outcomes and is sharing the highest-level intelligence; at the same time Zamir received updates on US plans to assist Israel if Iran does attack. The US military has been advised that the US might be perceived as weak if settling for negotiations after having made offers of help to the protesters.
Zamir shared the chief Israeli concern: that the US might strike a deal with Iran that addressed only the development of nuclear weapons.
https://www.ynetnews.com/article/by4nzhal11l
~~~~~~~~~~
And this leads me to the direct manner in which Prime Minister Netanyahu is addressing this and related concerns: Israel is advancing four principles, which must all be included in a deal with Iran. They will be presented directly to Witkoff, who is due here before meeting with the Iranian foreign minister:
The first is the removal of all enriched uranium currently held by Iran – estimated at around 400 kilograms of highly enriched material – to a third country.
The second calls for a complete halt to uranium enrichment on Iranian soil.
The third demand requires imposing strict limitations on Iran’s ballistic missile program, including restrictions on both missile range and production capacity.
The fourth demand involves an end to Iran’s financial and military support for proxy groups across the Middle East, including Hezbollah and the Houthis in Yemen.
“Israeli security officials emphasized that the message to Witkoff would be unambiguous: only an agreement that includes all four components would be considered strong and acceptable.
“Officials also warned against a deal focused solely on Iran’s nuclear program, saying such an agreement would be weak and bad not only for Israel but for the entire region.”
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/421867
It is exceedingly unlikely that the Iranians would accept these four demands. It would fall upon the US, then, to decide how to deal with the situation.
~~~~~~~~~~
I have no confidence in Witkoff what-so-ever. He is not a professional negotiator and is shockingly naïve. He is often way over his head and would be a sorry match against the wily Iranians.
The question of the day, I believe, may come down to this: Does Donald Trump truly want to bring peace to our region – which would almost certainly mean invoking strong military action. Or would he be content with creating an impression of peace via a negotiated deal with a devious and untrustworthy Iran.
~~~~~~~~~~
Please, pray for all of Am Yisrael: for the wisdom and courage of our leaders and the strength of our IDF and all of our people. Pray as well for the leaders of the U.S., that they will have the courage and wisdom to act to bring true peace to our region.
©Arlene Kushner. This material is produced by independent journalist Arlene Kushner. Permission is granted for it to be reproduced only with proper attribution.


So my guess is: no surprizes. The Iranians will try to bargain to get an agreement that will be easy to twist out of recognition while claiming to be in fulfillment. Then they will continue to do the same as before until they are forceably stopped. The only question is, why wait for the inevitable?