Barrack accuses Israel of ‘unnecessary escalation that does not advance regional stability’
| Published: August 19, 2026
Tom Barrack met with Ahmed al-Sharaa. Photo by Ambassador Tom Barrack – X.com, Public Domain, Wikipedia
U.S. Ambassador Tom Barrack on Tuesday condemned airstrikes that the Israeli military allegedly carried out on a military airport in northern Syria overnight, amid reports that the strikes could be connected to the growing Turkish presence in the area.
In an unusual statement published before any Israeli official had commented on the reports, Barrack, who is the ambassador to Turkey and special envoy to Syria, said the United States is “concerned that the confirmed Israeli airstrikes on Abu al-Duhur Airbase constitute an unnecessary escalation that does not advance regional stability.”
The airport is located in Idlib province, some 300 kilometers (188 miles) from the Israeli border and around 70 kilometers (43.5 miles) from Turkey. It has reportedly been out of service since being damaged during Syria’s civil war, though reports suggested that recent attempts to rehabilitate the airport could be connected to Turkish efforts to establish a larger military and civilian presence in the area.
We are deeply concerned that the confirmed Israeli airstrikes on Abu al-Duhur Airbase constitute an unnecessary escalation that does not advance regional stability.
The Al-Sharra government has neither adopted a predatory posture nor maintained proxy forces. It has, in fact,…
— Ambassador Tom Barrack (@USAMBTurkiye) August 18, 2026
Barrack argued that the new Syrian government of President Ahmad al-Sharaa, previously a wanted terrorist who controlled an enclave in Idlib province for a few years before toppling the Assad regime in late 2024, “has neither adopted a predatory posture nor maintained proxy forces. It has, in fact, repeatedly indicated a preference for de-escalation with Israel.”
He added that the U.S. has hosted “discussions to encourage diplomatic cadence over kinetic frustration for both nations. Enduring deescalation agreements are built through sustained dialogues with all concerned nations and principals. The United States continues to believe that restraint and engagement offer the more constructive course. We encourage all parties to prioritize logical discourse over further military incidents,” wrote Barrack.
Later on Tuesday, an unnamed senior Israeli official told Fox News that Israel was behind the strikes, stressing that Jerusalem shared “highly sensitive intelligence” with the U.S. beforehand.
Airstrike on Abu al-Duhur Airbase (August 18, 2026)
We do not currently know what was hit at the Abu al-Duhur Military Airbase. Assuming that the reports of the strike and the physical damage to the runway and several warehouses are accurate, we assess that, if warehouses were… pic.twitter.com/gQUuvx9PLr
— Israel-Alma (@Israel_Alma_org) August 18, 2026
“Al-Sharaa understands that he cannot operate like the previous Syrian regime, which maintained proxy forces. It’s possible that he didn’t understand what was going on, or didn’t know,” the official said, adding that “due to the highly classified nature of the intelligence” he couldn’t reveal further details about the strike.
According to Syrian media reports citing Syrian military sources, Israeli fighter jets carried out eight strikes early on Tuesday morning, hitting the runway and abandoned aircraft hangars without causing any casualties.
The Qatari newspaper Al-Araby Al-Jadeed said that the strikes followed shortly after a visit by a Turkish military delegation to the site, reportedly as part of efforts to rehabilitate the runway.
The Syrian Foreign Ministry condemned the strikes, which it called an “unjustified” Israeli attack, urging the international community and UN Security Council to condemn Israel’s repeated violations.
According to a recent report by Israel’s Channel 13 News, Israel has been pushing the U.S. to approve more strikes in Syria, after identifying increasing Turkish attempts to take over airports and other infrastructure. The report noted that the White House consistently opposed Israeli strikes.
Jerusalem and Washington have been at odds about the new Syrian government since it was established, with Israel arguing that the former terrorist and his new government troops, which are largely made up of former jihadist fighters, continue to pose a threat to Israel.
The United States, on the other hand, has pushed Israel to sign a security arrangement with Damascus.
After building a new ground military, reports suggested that the Syrian Defense Ministry has been advancing efforts to rebuild its air force as well. At the end of July, the Syrian Air Force College announced the graduation of the first 1,000 cadets since the fall of the Assad regime.
Earlier this week, Syria reportedly conducted its first air exercises in the north using Russian-made MiG-21 fighter jets.
Two weeks ago, Kan News reported that there are growing concerns about these developments in Israeli security circles.
Israel’s main concern in this context is reportedly the expanding Turkish presence, which could aim to boost the Syrian Air Force while deploying air-defense systems simultaneously, endangering Israel’s freedom of action in Syrian airspace, which has been critical in the fighting against the Iranian regime.
“We are monitoring developments in Syria and sharing our concerns with the United States,” a security official said.
According to Ynet News, during Trump envoy Jared Kushner’s visit to Israel on Monday, Shin Bet Director David Zini and IDF Military Intelligence Director Shlomi Binder also presented extensive intelligence on Hamas’s military buildup, including intelligence indicating that Turkey is financing Hamas.
Hamas spokesman Hazem Qassem also condemned the Israeli strike in Syria, describing it as “a continuation of the aggressive occupation policy toward the entire region.”


Israel should stay where it is till Hamas and Syria crawl out with big Sadat smiles and offer the peace raties they could have had a lifetime ago – like Sadat.
@frankadam@aol.com
My comment: I agree with every word before “till.”
See: “Sadat’s Strategy: History in the making” (1979) by Professor Paul Eidelberg. (AFSI free pdf) a must read. Also available in original book form used, from Amazon and other sites.
“I was in our village for the summer vacation when Hitler marched forth
from Munich to Berlin, to wipe out the consequences of Germany’s
defeat in World War I and rebuild his country. I gathered my friends
and told them we ought to follow Hitler’s example…”
Anwar el-Sadat
Autobiography (1978)(1)”
“Chapter 1:
THE MODEL FOR CONQUEST
The preponderance of evidence indicates that Anwar el-Sadat, the
President of Egypt, is engaged in a plan to destroy the state of Israel, and
that he has patterned his method after the Nazi model of conquest. The
model is a war-and-peace strategy synchronized to facilitate the eventual
destruction of the enemy. It is suitable for use by dictators against
democracies, that is, against regimes based on the primacy of public
opinion—what Hitler called “the mightiest factor of our time.” Sadat, who
taught himself German while imprisoned by the British during World War
II for his pro-Nazi activities, has studied Hitler’s diplomatic tactics and
methods of psychological warfare. He is applying them with cunning and
effectiveness in his war against Israel.
The strategy has three interrelated objectives, the achievement of
which depends very largely on the oratorical ability of the dictator to:
1) Shift the responsibility for war onto the enemy (while posing as the apostle of peace).
2) Divide and demoralize the enemy (by courting opposition party leaders and peace movements in the enemy’s country).
3) Alienate the enemy from his friends or allies (by raising the spectre of war and economic catastrophe).
These three objectives may be pursued simultaneously by means of semantic subversion, and most effectively by using the language of democracy against democracy.…”
https://afsi.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/SadatsStrategy_Eidelberg1.pdf
So US officials are telling the Arabs and Turks to get together to coordinate action against Israel. This sounds like the kind of behavior we saw in Obama’s presidency.
Then we read that Israel provided accurate intelligence before the alleged Israeli strikes on an unused airfield being eyed by the Turks.
What will come next? Will the USAF attempt to interfere with Israeli activities while presenting information detrimental to Israel to the world as a warning that they may actually try to hinder those activities? It wouldn’t be the first time.
I hope they realize the consequences.