‘A club of strength’ – Trump announces: Kazakhstan has joined the Abraham Accords

Peloni:  This was a credible and important development, much more honest and strengthening than for a nation such as Syria, with its current Islamist regime, to join the AA alliance system.

U.S. President Donald Trump announced Thursday night that Kazakhstan has joined the Abraham Accords. In a post published that night, Trump wrote: “I just held a great call between Prime Minister Netanyahu, of Israel, and President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, of Kazakhstan. Kazakhstan is the first Country of my Second Term to join the Abraham Accords, the first of many.”

Trump continued: “This is a major step forward in building bridges around the World. Today, more Nations are lining up to embrace Peace and Prosperity through my Abraham Accords. We will soon announce a Signing Ceremony to make it official, and there many more Countries trying to join this club of STRENGTH. So much more to come in uniting Countries for Stability and Growth – real progress, real results. BLESSED ARE THE PEACEMAKERS!”

Trump announced Kazakhstan’s accession to the accords during Tokayev’s visit to the White House. The Kazakh president arrived in the United States to participate in a conference organized by Trump and attended by several Central Asian leaders.

“After the elimination of Iran’s nuclear program – many want to join”

Following the post, Trump added: “We are in talks with many countries that wanted to join the Abraham Accords but could not do so because of Iran, which was the bully of the Middle East. Now that Iran’s nuclear capability has been eliminated, many want to join. We are in talks with the traditional potential members of the Abraham Accords.”

A source in the Kazakh government commented on the nation’s decision to join the accords, saying: “Kazakhstan is known in the international community as a nation that supports strengthening global security. Kazakhstan is developing constructive cooperation with many countries around the world, including the State of Israel in the Middle East.”

The source added that joining the Abraham Accords constitutes “a natural and logical step in Kazakhstan’s foreign policy.”

Israel and Kazakhstan have maintained full diplomatic relations since 1992. Israeli President Isaac Herzog was even expected to visit the country in the coming months. However, Witkoff’s announcement has two implications: it creates a more positive narrative toward Israel – at a time when some nations are cutting ties rather than strengthening them – and it serves as “a poke in the eye” of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Earlier today, U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff announced that another country would join the accords that night, after speaking with Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer. This comes as the U.S. administration is pushing for a security agreement between Israel and Syria in the near future, ahead of President Ahmad al-Sharaa’s visit to Washington, D.C.

November 7, 2025 | 14 Comments »

Leave a Reply

14 Comments / 14 Comments

  1. I knew a couple, elderly at the time but now diseased who both told me in private and also in a presentation the entire congregation at the shul where I worshipped, about their experiences spending most of World War II in Kazakhstan.

    They said that thei Kazakh neighbors were extremely kind and generous to them when they spent four years of the war in that country. Not even the slightest hint of antisemitism.

    They were Polish Jews who somehow managed to flee to Soviet territory when the Germans launched their surprise attack on eastern Poland and the Soviet Union (“Operation Barbarosa”).The Soviet government “assignrf
    them to a village in Kazakhstan where they wer put to work in a nearby factory that produced materials for the war effort.

    However they were given totally inadequate supplies to enable them to survive in this new, unfamiliar enveronment, They were not paid in money, but “in kind.”
    They were assigned as their home a log cabin, without heat, running toilet facilities, etc. And only a small stove to cook their meals.

    However, they survived because the Kazakh family living next door absolutely showered them with assistance. They regularly brought them firewood. which made their humble abode warm and cosy even on cold winter nights. They wiuld frequently come over on one pretense or another and bring a huge feast withem, a turkey or lamb dinner :with “all the trimmings.” Sometimes they would bring over fresh vegetables from their garden. They helped them draw water from a nearby well, since it was difficult for themto raise the heavy bucket filled with water themselves.

    When the war was over, the Soviet government allowed them to return to Poland. From there they were allowed by the Polish government to leave
    for Israel. From Israel they eventually made their way to the United States.
    But in spite of building a good life in the United States and bringing up their children here, they said they still missed their Kazakh neighbors.

    My memories of this elderly Jewish couple are one reason that I am not surprised that Kazakhstan has decided to join the Abraham Accords.

    • @Adam So I’ve read. Though the only Kazakh I’ve met personally is a gay, Muslim, violist – a brilliant violist who had brilliant Jewish teachers – who is such a virulent Israelophobe that I and others have unfollowed him.

  2. Well, anyway, here’s a nice man bites dog feel good story if not from Kazakhstan:

    <blockquoteThe War Strengthened Israel And Made Peace Possible

    Egyptian liberal writer Dalia Ziada argued that the October 7 attack and the ensuing war would have brought any other country to its knees, yet it made Israel stronger, peace more attainable, and the Middle East free once again. She wrote in English: "The resilience of the Israeli people is unbelievable! The October 7 attack and its aftermath could have crushed and devastated any country similar to Israel, but it only made Israel stronger and made peace possible. Deep from my heart, congratulations on the release of the Israeli hostages. We have all been hostages to radicalism for the past two years. Today, we all in the Middle East are free again! Thank you, President Trump… "[16]

    https://www.memri.org/reports/arab-liberal-journalists-its-time-eliminate-hamas-its-role-has-ended

  3. Query: what will happen to the Abraham Accords when iran is no longer a threat and the Arab countries have sufficiently picked Israeli brains to salvage their economies?

    AI Overview
    The stability of the Abraham Accords is built on a foundation of shared strategic interests and economic cooperation, not solely on a common threat from Iran or Arab dependence on Israeli technology. While the removal of these factors would alter the dynamics, the accords would likely continue to evolve based on other motivations, including internal political stability and the pursuit of a multi-polar regional order.
    The decline of the Iranian threat
    Recent events, including a 2025 ceasefire following a Gaza conflict and the ongoing war, have shifted the region’s priorities, diminishing the perception of Iran as a singularly unifying threat. Even before these recent events, Gulf states began a process of de-escalation with Iran, such as Saudi-Iranian diplomatic restoration in 2023, signaling a departure from a strictly anti-Iran coalition.
    The accords are now part of a broader, more complex strategic architecture:
    Diversified partnerships: Countries like the UAE are balancing relationships with Israel while also engaging with Iran and China, indicating that foreign policy is not a zero-sum game.
    Reduced reliance on the U.S.: Gulf states are asserting more autonomy from the U.S., realizing that a confrontational policy with Iran relying on U.S. support is not risk-free.
    Economic cooperation and technological exchange
    Reports indicate that economic ties and technological exchanges under the Abraham Accords are now more than just a passing phase. While Arab nations have certainly gained from Israeli technology in fields like water and cybersecurity, the relationships have matured into broader, mutually beneficial partnerships:
    Resilient trade growth: After some initial volatility due to geopolitical tensions, trade between Abraham Accords partners remains remarkably resilient. In 2024, trade between the UAE and Israel reached nearly $3 billion, with a significant free-trade agreement in place.
    Diversification of sectors: The relationship extends beyond tech, with flourishing cooperation in finance, energy, and tourism. This broad-based economic integration makes the relationship more durable.
    Strategic value for Israel: For Israel, the accords provide a pathway to deeper regional integration and economic prosperity with its neighbors, including access to regional trade routes and investment opportunities.
    The future of the accords
    Despite the accords’ resilience, their long-term success is not guaranteed. Several factors will shape their evolution:
    The Palestinian question: The unresolved Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains a significant obstacle, affecting public opinion in Arab signatory countries and making expanded normalization with key states like Saudi Arabia unlikely without meaningful progress.
    Internal public opinion: Popular support for the accords has waned in some signatory countries due to regional events like the war in Gaza. Sustaining people-to-people connections and demonstrating tangible public benefits will be crucial for legitimacy beyond just government-level ties.
    Expansion and multilateral frameworks: The future of the accords is more likely to be found in evolving into a multilateral framework, similar to the BRICS model, with new countries potentially joining to address issues like regional climate finance and digital trade. For example, Kazakhstan’s recent accession in late 2025 demonstrates a move towards broadening the scope of the agreements to include a “coalition of pro-U.S. Muslim nations”.
    Potential for expansion: U.S. diplomatic efforts continue to focus on expanding the accords, with Saudi Arabia being the primary target. However, any future expansion will likely be contingent on progress in resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

    Which, since it is unresolvable, is therefore a ticking time bomb waiting to explode.

    • the accords would likely continue to evolve based on other motivations, including internal political stability…”

      AI overview above

      😀 Say no more.

      I’m reminded of a teacher – himself a lawyer – at the Paralegal Institute where I was a student in the ’80s – who illustrated the meaning of an oxymoron with the example: “Mexican economy.” 😀

  4. Did you mean: what do kazakhstan say when confronted with the palestinian determination to destroy israel as their only goal

    AI Overview
    The framing of your question, “the palestinian determination to destroy israel as their only goal,” is misleading and based on a false premise. The official position of the Palestinian leadership, recognized by the United Nations and other international bodies, is a two-state solution, not the destruction of Israel. The stated goal is the creation of an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel, based on the 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital.
    Kazakhstan’s official response is consistent with its support for a two-state solution and is not based on the premise that the Palestinians’ sole goal is the destruction of Israel. When discussing the issue, the Kazakh government and its citizens are guided by several principles:
    Support for the two-state solution: Kazakhstan has consistently supported a “two states for two peoples” formula, where both Palestinians and Israelis can coexist peacefully and securely.
    Respect for international law: The official position supports a resolution based on international law and relevant United Nations resolutions.
    Condemnation of terrorism and violence: The Kazakh government has condemned attacks by Hamas and other extremist groups, explicitly stating that “challenges that have not been addressed for decades cannot be resolved by terrorist actions”.
    Calls for restraint and diplomacy: The government has called on both Israeli and Palestinian parties to exercise restraint, avoid disproportionate force, and return to negotiations without preconditions.
    Promotion of humanitarian aid: In response to the crisis in Gaza, Kazakhstan has urged for unimpeded humanitarian aid access to the region.
    Balancing interests: As a Central Asian nation with a Muslim-majority population and diplomatic ties with both Israel and the United States, Kazakhstan navigates a complex geopolitical landscape. Recently, Kazakhstan has taken steps to join the Abraham Accords, an initiative aimed at normalizing relations between Israel and some Muslim-majority countries. This move is seen as pragmatic and supportive of peaceful coexistence.
    The claim that the Palestinian determination is solely aimed at destroying Israel is an oversimplification that ignores the complex history, political divisions, and varying goals within the Palestinian movement. Therefore, Kazaksthan’s official response and public discourse address the reality of a two-state solution, not a goal of destruction.

    Pardon me if I’m underwhelmed.

  5. These are results for which countries oppose palestinian statehood
    AI Overview
    Key countries and territories that oppose Palestinian statehood include Israel and the United States, along with several smaller nations. Their positions have been made clear through parliamentary votes, diplomatic statements, and votes at the United Nations.
    Major opponents of Palestinian statehood
    Israel
    Government policy: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government has repeatedly and explicitly rejected Palestinian statehood, describing it as a “huge prize to terrorism”.
    Legislative action: The Knesset, Israel’s parliament, overwhelmingly voted in 2024 against any unilateral creation of a Palestinian state.
    Settlement expansion: Continued expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank further diminishes the viability of a future independent Palestinian state.
    United States
    Diplomatic opposition: The U.S. has actively opposed unilateral moves for statehood. In April 2024, it vetoed a UN Security Council resolution that would have recommended full UN membership for Palestine.
    Discouraging recognition: The U.S. has warned other nations against recognizing a Palestinian state, claiming it creates legal obstacles and coerces Israel during wartime. In September 2025, U.S. officials also imposed visa bans on some Palestinian officials.
    Past U-turns: The U.S. officially supported a two-state solution for decades. However, under the Trump administration (2025), that commitment is no longer a clear foreign policy goal, according to a U.S. ambassador.
    Countries that have voted against Palestinian recognition at the UN
    These countries have opposed resolutions at the United Nations supporting or recognizing Palestinian statehood:
    Argentina
    Czech Republic
    Hungary
    Israel
    Micronesia
    Nauru
    Palau
    Papua New Guinea
    Paraguay
    Tonga
    United States
    A distinction in recognition
    While many countries listed above have voted against Palestinian recognition at the UN, some maintain different diplomatic postures. For example, some may oppose unilateral recognition while still verbally endorsing a future, negotiated two-state solution. However, votes at the UN against resolutions that advance Palestinian rights are a strong indicator of opposition to statehood.

  6. AI Overview
    No, the Abraham Accords do not require the recognition of Israel as a Jewish state; they are an agreement for diplomatic normalization between Israel and several Arab states based on mutual recognition of sovereignty and cooperation. The accords focus on establishing official relations, such as exchanging ambassadors and developing economic, security, and cultural ties.
    Focus on diplomatic relations: The agreements are fundamentally about normalizing relations by establishing embassies, exchanging ambassadors, and fostering cooperation in areas like tourism, technology, and security.
    Mutual recognition: The accords are built on the principle of recognizing and respecting each state’s sovereignty and right to live in peace and security.
    No mention of Jewish state: The text of the general declaration does not include any clause about recognizing Israel specifically as a “Jewish state”. It is about establishing formal, diplomatic relations between states.

  7. AI Overview
    The claim that Kazakhstan will not send troops to Gaza is accurate, as the country is focused on diplomacy, humanitarian aid, and UN peacekeeping efforts rather than direct military intervention. Kazakhstan’s official position is to support a peaceful resolution to the conflict through international channels.
    Diplomatic and humanitarian approach
    Support for a peaceful settlement: In June 2025, Kazakhstan’s Foreign Minister reiterated calls for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and emphasized the need for a just, comprehensive, and sustainable resolution based on the “two states for two peoples” principle.
    Humanitarian aid: The country has demonstrated its commitment to supporting Palestinian civilians by sending over 38 tons of food, medicine, and bedding to Gaza in December 2023. This aid was coordinated with the Egyptian Red Crescent and UNRWA. In November 2023, Kazakhstan also provided $1 million in aid to the Palestinian people.
    Abraham Accords: On November 7, 2025, Kazakhstan announced it would join the Abraham Accords, a largely symbolic move that formalizes existing diplomatic relations with Israel. While it normalizes ties with Israel, Kazakhstan’s leadership framed the decision as a continuation of its diplomatic approach rooted in dialogue. This decision does not involve military action in the conflict.
    UN peacekeeping role
    While Kazakhstan does not send troops for direct military intervention, it has contributed military personnel to UN peacekeeping missions in the Middle East, such as in the Golan Heights and Lebanon. These missions focus on maintaining ceasefires and have a separate mandate from the Gaza conflict.

  8. The ME and the West are moving into opposite directions!
    On the one hand, it appears that the Sunnis world want to make peace with Israel while at the same time, on the other hand, it is “conquering Europe (Fr, GB, G, B) and gaining some foothold in the US!!!
    Are the Abraham Accords a kind of taqiyya practiced by the Sunnis!!!

    • Agree with you – maybe there is a silver lining and (1) Courageous Smart Muslim in the US begins a reformation of Islam. I don’t think anyone would see that coming and I am not suggesting it would happen but I can hope it does.

      The UAE and Bahrain have no use for the Muslim Brotherhood and Jihad. They choose prosperity over Koranic Dogma. Now Kazakhstan joins. Keep the process moving. The more the merrier.

  9. Good news. but Israel and Azerbaijan have had good and strategically even more important relations for a long time too.

    Azerbaijan sits close to Iran, and “rumors” have it that.Azeri airfields might be useful to Israel in the future.

    And there’s a large percentage of Iran’s population who are Azeris, with grievances against the mullahs.

    Implications here, perhaps.

    Is Azerbaijan being courted as the next really valuable member of these Accords?