CNN: Fewer than half of Americans support Jerusalem recognition

T. Belman. I suspect any poll conducted by CNN. But if it is a true reflection of  what American’s think, I am shocked. This should be a no-brainer.

Trump should follow through on his threats to deny funding to the UN, those who voted in favor of the UNGA resolution and the PA. all of whom stand in opposition to his policies. He should not let them get away with it.

Besides the UN is of no value to the US or to Israel. Its time for the UN to be replaced by an organization of allies of the US.

Only 36% of respondents to CNN survey favor moving US embassy to holy city; support for Trump recognizing Israel’s capital split along party lines>

By TOI STAFF

A giant US flag screened alongside Israel's national flag on the walls of the Old City in Jerusalem, December 6, 2017. (Ahmad Gharabli/AFP)
A giant US flag screened alongside Israel’s national flag on the walls of the Old City in Jerusalem, December 6, 2017. (Ahmad Gharabli/AFP)

A poll released Friday indicated that fewer than half of Americans support US President Donald Trump’s recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, with an even smaller number supporting moving the US embassy to the city from Tel Aviv.

On whether they approve of recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, 44 percent of respondents told CNN they back Trump’s decision, while 45% said they disapprove. Only 36% said they support moving the US embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, as Trump said he would.

Support for the move was sharply split along party lines. Among Republicans, 79% said they approve recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, while two-thirds favor moving the embassy to the city. On the other side of the aisle, 71% of Democrats opposed both decisions.

Friday’s CNN poll also asked whether the US should take sides in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with two-thirds of Americans saying it should not. For those who said the US should take sides, 24% said the US should back Israel, with only 2% saying it should side with the Palestinians.

Responses to that question also corresponded closely to party affiliation, with 48% of Republicans saying the US should side with Israel and only 2% saying it should take the side of the Palestinians. Among Democrats, those figures were 12% and 2%, respectively.

With this, 78% of Democrats and 70% of independents said the US should be neutral in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, as opposed to 44% of Republicans who said they the US should not pick sides.

Asked about the prospects for peace in the Middle East, 56% of poll respondents said they don’t believe a time will come when Israel and its Arab neighbors will resolve the Arab-Israeli conflict and live in peace, while 39% said it will.

The poll for CNN was conducted between December 14-17, prior to a pair of votes at the United Nations this week on the Jerusalem issue.

An Israeli flag flutters on the roof of a building of the Jewish Quarter in the Old City of Jerusalem, as the Dome of the Rock is seen in the background, on December 5, 2017. (AFP Photo/Thomas Coex)

On Thursday, the UN General Assembly defied warnings from the US and overwhelmingly passed a resolution condemning the Trump administration’s recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and calling on countries not to move their diplomatic missions to the city.

A total of 128 countries voted in favor of the text, defying Trump’s threat — forcefully reiterated in an address before the vote by US envoy Nikki Haley —  to cut aid to countries that opposed the motion.

Nine countries — the US,  Israel, Togo, Micronesia, Guatemala, Nauru, Palau, Marshall Islands and Honduras — voted against the resolution.

There were 35 abstentions, including a number of countries that had been widely expected to support the move, such as Colombia, Mexico, Malawi and Rwanda. A further 21 countries did not vote at all.

On Monday, in the Security Council, 14 out of 15 members had voted in favor of the resolution, which failed to pass due to an American veto. There are no vetoes at the General Assembly, but — as opposed to the Security Council — resolutions passed there are not legally binding.

Before Thursday’s vote, a series of officials addressed the “emergency special session” on “[i]llegal Israeli actions in Occupied East Jerusalem and the rest of the Occupied Palestinian Territory.” The session was called by Yemen and Turkey.

The US ambassador to the UN, Haley, defended the administration’s recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, said the US had the sovereign right to place its embassies where it wished, and warned that America — the biggest funder of the UN — did not take kindly to being disrespected and paying for the “dubious privilege.”

“The decision does not prejudge any final status issues, including Jerusalem’s boundaries. The decision does not preclude a two-state solution, if the parties agree to that,” she said. “The decision does nothing to harm peace efforts. Rather, the president’s decision reflects the will of the American people and our right as a nation to choose the location of our embassy.”

“America will put our embassy to Jerusalem,” Haley stressed. “That’s what the American people want us to do. And it’s the right thing to do.” No vote at the UN will make any difference on the American decision, she declared. But this vote will be remembered, she vowed, when America is being asked once again to make the single-largest contribution to the UN budget or when “so many countries come calling on us, as they so often do, to pay even more and to use our influence for their benefit.”

Nikki Haley, United States Ambassador to the United Nations, speaks on the floor of the General Assembly on December 21, 2017 in New York City. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images/AFP)

Israeli officials had rejected the vote’s outcome before it took place.

“The State of Israel flatly rejects this vote even before it is held,” Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said earlier on Thursday. “Jerusalem is our capital. We will continue to build in it and foreign embassies, led by the US embassy, will move to Jerusalem. It will happen.”

In the run-up to Thursday’s vote, Israeli diplomats stationed abroad made strenuous efforts to get as many countries as possible to oppose or abstain on the resolution.

On Wednesday, Trump had praised Haley for warning foreign diplomats that she will be “taking names” of countries that support the resolution criticizing America’s position on Jerusalem.

“I like the message that Nikki sent yesterday at the United Nations for all of these nations that take our money and then they vote against us at the Security Council, or they vote against us potentially at the assembly,” the president told members of his cabinet in the White House.

“They take hundreds of millions of dollars and even billions of dollars, and then they vote against us,” he said. “Well, we’re watching those votes. Let them vote against us, we’ll save a lot. We don’t care.”

US President Donald Trump exits Air Force One at Palm Beach International Airport in Palm Beach, Florida, on December 22, 2017. (AFP Photo/ Nicholas Kamm)
December 23, 2017 | 10 Comments »

Subscribe to Israpundit Daily Digest

Leave a Reply

10 Comments / 10 Comments

  1. @ Michael S:
    You are correct in general about Debka in my view.

    In observing how high on the tree Abbas has climbed in his anti-USA/Trump tirade of weeks. Also, plus the fact that Trump said he would with hold money from countries backing the anti- USA/Israel resolution. Compounded by the continuous bashing of Trump Abbas and his people are doing I believe what Debka reported could very well end up happening.

    Also Trump gave the PA an ultimatum before stop paying terrorists or we will cut you off. They told him they would continue doing that. We have seen Trump does not like to shown up and does not like terrorists. So whether Debka had info from good sources, was speculating or deducting like I am doing now I believe the Pal organizations will be cut off. Hell Abbas has said he has cut the USA off.

  2. CNN is fundamentally biased and therefore their polls are biased and useless.
    I wouldn’t worry about F.K. CNN.
    Pal never had any intention to accept any plan ever till the last dead Pal.
    MBS remains silent. “Qui ne dit mot, consent” (Fr.)

  3. @ Bear Klein:
    Hi, Bear

    My ongoing commentary on DEBKA it that they are “sometimes right, sometimes wrong, but always first”. I usually check them out before reading other news, often then reading Breitbart and then Fox. In every case, when I suspect the accuracy of an item, I Google keywords to see what others are saying about it. In this case, I used the keywords,

    “Palestinians, no peace plan”, and got:

    Jerusalem: Palestinian leader Abbas spurns US peace plan BBC News (not linked to DEBKA) and

    Jerusalem: Palestinians won’t accept any US peace plan, says Mahmoud Abbas The Independent (by Chris Baynes, not linked to DEBKA)

    Adding “Trump” as a keyword, I get,

    “In Christmas message aimed at Trump, Abbas says Palestinians will never accept any peace plan from U.S. Haaretz”

    and similar articles. My immediate reaction, is that DEBKA has built its story around bluster by the ever-blustering Abbas. Therefore, no, I don’t attach any significance to it: It’s what most of DEBKA’s misinformation seems to be, namely, wishful thinking.

  4. These polls are irrelevant whether they are correct or not. Not Trump made this decision, but US Congress!!! As of this poll, of course it does not reflect the opinion of Americans.

  5. These polls from a few years ago read just the opposite. Like to see some other polls.

    http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/american-attitudes-regarding-jerusalem

    And then, considering how mercurial and public opinion can be on any issue, what constitutes American Public Opinion? The will of elected officials or snap polls done by whoever at any particular moment in answer to cleverly crafted questions in a media environment of jumping to conclusions from one line headlines and only thinking about it carefully later.?

  6. Ted, Take a look at Debka’s Article if true this is the beginning of the end of the PA and UNRWA.

    Trump administration to snap ties with Palestinians, no peace plan, no more monetary aid. Including cutting off the billion dollars to UNRWA.

    The White House has decided to quietly withdraw from all its ties with the Ramallah-based Palestinian Authority and Mahmoud Abbas.

    https://www.debka.com/trump-administration-snap-ties-palestinians-no-peace-plan-no-monetary-aid/

  7. @ leonkushner:
    Isn’t this the same news outlet that told us that Hillary would win by a landslide? Isn’t America the country that continually polls at 70% support for Israel?
    Therefore the takeaway is that America overwhelmingly supports moving our embassy.

  8. Ted you took the words out of my mouth at the top of this article. On the other hand I don’t believe a word that comes out of CNN- Fake News.