Peloni: Fourteen months ago, Joan Swirsky noted that Voter Fraud: The Only Issue That Matters in 2024. She was right. It is good to see that the DOJ is moving towards the objective of providing full transparency and accountability of an election which is now 5yrs old, but the reality is that this should have been pursued in the early months of Trump’s second term. Imani notes that this is the “first step in a 2026 campaign to clean the slate”, but why was this campaign to clean the slate not begun in the early months of 2025. Election integrity should be a fundamental right which should be pursued without a political basis, and preferably not specifically at the height of a political season, right?
By Amil Imani | Am Thinker | Dec 23, 2025
Image: Harmeet Dhillon. Credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr, CC BY-SA 2.0.
The time for “polite inquiries” is officially over. For five years, the bureaucratic fortress of Fulton County, Georgia has stonewalled every attempt to look under the hood of the 2020 election. They hid behind state seals, played legal shell games with ballot locations, and treated public record requests like personal insults. But as of December 2025, the game has changed. The Department of Justice (DOJ), now acting as a legal strike force under the Trump administration, has launched a federal offensive that is sending shockwaves through the Georgia political establishment.
Led by assistant attorney general Harmeet Dhillon, the DOJ has filed a massive lawsuit in the Northern District of Georgia to force Fulton County to surrender every used and void ballot, signature envelope, and digital record from 2020. The target is clear: total transparency, backed by the threat of criminal indictments.
At the center of this legal firestorm is a revelation that should make every voter’s blood boil. In a December 9, 2025 hearing before the Georgia State Election Board (SEB), Fulton County’s own legal counsel, Ann Brumbaugh, was forced to make a catastrophic admission: More than 130 tabulator tapes from the 2020 early voting period were never signed.
By law (Georgia Rule 183-1-12-.12), every tabulator tape — the physical “receipt” produced by a voting machine — must be signed by a poll manager and two witnesses. These signatures are the only thing standing between a legitimate tally and a fabricated one. In Fulton County, those signatures simply aren’t there. We are talking about the “certification” of 315,000 early in-person votes — the vast majority of the county’s early count — that lack the basic legal requirement for validity.
The question that now haunts the halls of the Fulton County Government Center is simple: Who signed the fake tapes? Or more accurately, who moved those 315,000 votes into the final count when they knew the tapes were unsigned or missing? If those records were later “created” or backfilled to cover the gap, it isn’t a clerical error — it’s a federal felony.
As the DOJ moves in, the county’s story about the physical ballots has begun to crumble. Investigators have reportedly been sent on a wild goose chase between two different locations: the Clerk of Courts office and a central warehouse. The confusion isn’t accidental; it’s a tactic.
But the DOJ isn’t playing along. The October 2025 subpoena demanded “all used and void ballots, stubs, and digital files.” When clerk Ché Alexander claimed the records were “under seal” and unreachable, the DOJ hit back with a federal lawsuit. They are now using Title III of the Civil Rights Act of 1960 to bypass local “seals,” arguing that the county has a federal duty to produce these records for inspection.
The fear among election integrity advocates is that these records may have been “cleaned” or destroyed in unsecured warehouses. If the physical ballots don’t match the digital uploads — or if they’ve mysteriously vanished — the officials in charge won’t just be facing fines; they’ll be facing a RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) investigation that could dismantle the entire county election board.
The State Election Board has already shown that it has no appetite for more excuses. In a 3-0 vote this month, the board referred Fulton County to the Georgia attorney general for sanctions. With fines authorized up to $5,000 per missing tape, the county is staring down a bill that could exceed $670,000.
But the real danger isn’t the money. It’s the forensic audit of 2026.
Once the DOJ secures these records — likely in early 2026 — the focus will shift to
- Signature Comparison: Matching the signatures on those 315,000 ballots to the actual voter rolls.
- Digital Forensics: Identifying the exact user logins that uploaded “unsigned” data into the state’s central server.
- Chain of Custody: Tracing the path of every ballot box to see if the “two-location” confusion was a cover for evidence tampering.
Dhillon said, “At this Department of Justice, we will not permit states to jeopardize the integrity and effectiveness of elections. … If states will not fulfill their duty to protect the integrity of the ballot, we will.”
For years, the “landslide” claims were dismissed as conspiracy theories by the mainstream media. But you don’t file a federal lawsuit over a theory. You file it when you have an admission of 130 unsigned tapes and 315,000 unaccounted-for votes.
The DOJ’s litigation is the first step in a 2026 campaign to clean the slate. If the records show what many suspect — that votes were manufactured or “certified” through illegal means — then the “serious indictments” the public has been waiting for are inevitable. Accountability is no longer a question of if, but when.
I’m not a lawyer or even an affected party, but the common sense opinion must be along the lines of rerunning the election (least intrusive) or simply assuming (by a court, of course), that all missing votes were to the benefit of the loser, in this case Trump. This would also affect the number of seats in the senate or congress, although I have no idea how many seats would be changed. A worst case scenario would assume that even more ballots were forged or otherwise changed to Biden’s benefit. And when they are finished here, there are a couple of other voting locations that have produced questionable results.
Anyone out there with answers?
@dreuveni
The point is that of accountability. Importantly, the outcome of this election audit could lead to further audits of the 2022 and 2024 elections, as well as in other election jurisdictions as you indicated.