Into the Fray: The ruinous results of restraint

By MARTIN SHERMAN, JPOST

Israel can no longer enable its citizens to “live normal lives” without retaking Gaza. “Restraint” and “proportionality” have so degraded its deterrence that it can no longer dissuade enemies from attacking almost at will.

Gaza

Israeli soldiers stand atop an APC outside the central Gaza Strip Photo: REUTERS
The ultimate test of this agreement will be a test of blood. If it becomes clear that [Palestinians] cannot overcome terror, this will be a temporary accord and… we will have no choice but to abrogate it. And if there is no choice, the IDF will return to the places it is about to leave in the upcoming months.

– Yossi Beilin on the Oslo Accords 

Everything is reversible.

– Yitzhak Rabin on the Oslo Accords 

Truth be told, I found it difficult to write my column this week. I spent hours staring at my laptop’s keyboard, unable to compose a single sentence, feeling waves of anger, frustration and disbelief wash over me as the news of the bombardment of the country came streaming through the television set beside me.


Depressing déjà vu 

It was not that there was a dearth of topics to write about. There was a surplus of issues that could be subject matter for a column relating to the events of the last few days.

For example:

• The “original sin” of Oslo, that made the perverse – and previously scorned – notion of Palestinian statehood the center-piece of Israeli policy, which opened the flood gates of terror across the country, and eventually precipitated the current situation in Gaza;

• The continuous poor judgment by the Israeli leadership over the last two decades as to developments in Gaza and how they should be dealt with;

• The debilitating distortions and ridiculous restrictions imposed on the formulation and conduct of Israeli policy regarding Gaza by the diktats of political correctness;

• The imbecilic idea of abandoning Gaza unilaterally, thus providing the Palestinian- Arab terror organizations a territorial platform in which they could plan operations and prepare infrastructure, and from which they could launch countless attacks against Israeli civilian population centers.

• The ineffectual, albeit pyrotechnically spectacular, methods adopted by the IDF to deal with these attacks and destroy the infrastructures that facilitate them, which have allowed the terror organizations to develop operational capabilities that would have been inconceivable only a few years ago.

Yes, I could have written on any one of these topics – but every time I set out to put pen to paper (or rather fingers to keyboard), I realized that I had already written about it, in some detail, in the past – and a depressing sense of déjà vu descended upon me, sapping any will to explain the obvious and warn of the inevitable once again.

Cataloging the obvious, the inevitable and the imbecilic 

Over the last three years, since I began writing the Into the Fray series, I have published numerous columns dealing with the situation in Gaza, prescribing how it ought to be dealt with, and cautioning about the consequences if these caveats were not heeded.

Regrettably, although Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon have both personally informed me that they read my column, there is little indication that its prognoses and prescriptions have had any affect on policy decisions – despite the fact that they have, in large measure, been vindicated by developments.

I should, therefore, like to share with readers my sense of frustration, disappointment and disillusionment, and list the columns I have written on Gaza, together with their dates of publication, and the accompanying subheadlines, which convey the essence of their content and the issues they address: • “The white flag over Gaza…”: “Political correctness has precluded the pursuit of strategic imperatives; Israel can no longer credibly deter terrorists.” (08/25/2011).

• “Predicting Gaza: Rabin, Sharon, the Knesset and… well, me”: “The nation’s leaders have proved bereft of foresight – or hindsight for that matter. Can a dangerous ‘trust deficit’ be avoided?” (03/22/2012)

• “Aargh!!!”: “Despite the deadly display of hi-tech pyro-technics by the IDF, the depressing sense of déjà vu conveyed by the events unfolding in Gaza comprise a devastating indictment of Israel’s past and present political leadership.” (11/15/2012).

• “Israel 2012: Tactical brilliance, strategic imbecility”: “If the current government does not have the diplomatic competence to create the conditions necessary to provide security for its citizens, it should admit it.” (11/22/2012)

• “Israel’s infuriating impotence”: “Last week’s Gaza cease-fire proved the government incapable of delivering the goods militarily; this week’s UN vote proves it cannot deliver the goods diplomatically.”(11/29/2012)

• “Cry havoc! and let slip the dogs of war”: “By adhering to a policy of avoiding confrontations which Israel can win, the government risks leading it into one in which it might lose. It is time for a bold new offensive – before we are overtaken by events.” (07/03/2014)

Defies both reality and logic 

A quick reading of these sub-headlines provides a broad synopsis of what has happened, and – equally important – what has not happened, in Israel’s exchanges with the terrorist enclave in the south. It is a synopsis that compels one to a lamentable but indisputable conclusion: Israel’s policy toward Gaza defies both logic and reality.

Indeed, in many ways, it is a policy that constitutes a grave violation of the social contract between government and the electorate, by which the former is obligated to provide the latter with protection of life, limb and property.

The current round of fighting is the third in the last five-and-half years. In all cases, the initiative has largely been with the terror organizations that decide when to engage in combat and when to desist from it. In neither of the two previous campaigns (Cast Lead, 2008/9 and Pillar of Defense, 2012) was the mighty IDF able to force the lightly armed Hamas to cease its fire – despite the heavy damage inflicted on it.

Instead of the fighting ending with a Hamas surrender, and an admission of defeat, the organization could claim – not without justification – that it had achieved strategic victory.

Indeed, what is becoming increasingly clear is that the stated aims of the current campaign, Protective Edge, make it, at best, an exercise in recurring futility – if not one that is largely counter-productive – likely not only to be unable to prevent a future round of fighting, but worse, to ensure our adversaries will begin it with enhanced capabilities.

‘Restoring calm’ as dereliction of duty

The fault in Israel’s declared intentions that it will “answer calm with calm” and that its objective is limited to “restoring calm to the South” is two-fold.

First, by offering to cease fire if Hamas ceases fire, Israel surrenders the initiative to its adversaries and forgoes even the theoretical possibility of defeating them. Whenever Hamas feels it has absorbed, or inflicted, sufficient damage, it can initiate a truce, secure in the knowledge that it can control the cost of its aggression, and ensure it will never be excessive.

Second, the mere “restoration of calm” is an irrational if not counterproductive operational aim. For the periods of inter-bella calm have been consistently used by the Palestinian terror groups to enhance their capabilities – as dramatically illustrated this week.

After all, when Israel left Gaza (2005), the range of the Palestinian rockets was barely 5 km., and the explosive charge they carried about 5 kg., Now their missiles have a range of over 100 km. and warheads of around 100 kg. When Israel left Gaza, only the sparse population in its immediate proximity was threatened by missiles. Now well over 5 million Israelis, well beyond Tel Aviv, are menaced by them.

There is little reason to believe that once Hamas deigns to cease fire, the ensuing calm will not be exploited to achieve further advances/improvements in its ordnance and infrastructures.

No, “restoring calm” will just not cut it. If that is what the Israeli leadership is striving for, it is coming pretty close to dereliction of duty.

The strategic dangers of restraint

Indeed, restraint is not a prudent policy, reflecting judicious cool-headedness. Quite the opposite, it is a policy of evasion, of refusal to recognize reality and of avoiding current confrontations, which can be won (admittedly as a significant cost), while risking later confrontations, which may not be possible to win (at any cost).

The damage inflicted on Hamas in 2008/9 and 2012 (and on Hezbollah in 2006) has not broken, or even perceptibly reduced, their will to fight as the defeat in WWII did with Germany and Japan. At best, it has forced Hamas to regroup, rearm and redeploy.

Clearly then, the damage inflicted on it by the air force and other “standoff” weapon systems, while admittedly grave, is damage it is prepared to absorb, rather than forgo its hostile intentions toward Israel.

Inevitably, if the enemy’s will to fight cannot be diminished, his ability to do so must be eliminated. This cannot be done by standoff weaponry. It requires boots on the ground, physical control of the enemy territory, infrastructure and installations.

Adhering to restraint and refraining from a policy of imposing surrender and inflicting acknowledged defeat on Hamas is far from cost-free. To the contrary, the costs involved in persisting with a policy of restraint are more than likely to outstrip those of the more assertive alternative.

Dangers of restraint (cont.) 

The perils of restraint are myriad: On the operational-security level, they afford Hamas, and its more radical spin-offs, the opportunity to improve performance of weaponry and to:

• Tighten their counter-intelligence to constrict information on targets;

• Improve concealment and hardening of targets, which certainly seems to have been largely accomplished already, with Hamas being able to fire continuous heavy barrages of missiles, despite ferocious air attacks;

• Progress toward the establishment of an air defense system to curtail the present largely unrestricted freedom of action of the IAF;

• Develop multiple warheads for their rockets (activated by simple spring-release mechanisms already proposed on Pakistani and Chinese sites) and/or coordinate attacks with Hezbollah in the north in order to overwhelm Israel’s anti-missile defenses.

On the civilian level, the prospect of an unending recurrence of missile attacks on towns and villages is likely to result in depopulation of the more vulnerable areas, initially in the South. But with increased range of the enemy rockets, other areas, also afflicted by repeated bombardments, may find their populations denuded.

Moreover now that restraint has managed to bring central Israel (including Greater Tel Aviv) into Hamas’s rocket range, the threat of frequent large-scale disruptions of the socioeconomic routine is likely to have enormous ramifications. The short periods of calm that might have been bearable in the South will not be tolerated in the Center.

Unless a radical and permanent – or at least long-term – solution can be devised, large-scale flight of businesses and population is not an implausible prospect, which advocates of restraint must seriously ponder – and address.

Needed: Another kind of Iron Dome

The events of the last few days lead to an unpalatable but unavoidable conclusion: Israel can no longer enable its citizens to “live normal lives” without retaking Gaza.

Restraint and “proportionality” have so degraded its deterrence that it is no longer able to dissuade its enemies from attacking it almost at will. Israel must therefore destroy their ability to do so by seizing – and holding – the areas from which those attacks are launched.

This will of course involve contending with severe international censure, but this too is a topic I have addressed in several columns – see for example: “If I were prime minister…“: “The first order of business would be to devise and deploy a political ‘Iron Dome’ to protect Israel from the incoming barrages of delegitimization and demonization…” (10/31/2013).

Of course, the difficulties involved in administering a remedy deserves a discussion entirely separate from diagnosing what that remedy should be, and must be therefore deferred for a later occasion.

What is, however, vital to grasp is that although rejecting a policy of restraint is a path fraught with great difficulty, the difficultly cannot obviate the necessity.

Martin Sherman (www.martinsherman.org) is the founder and executive director of the Israel Institute for Strategic Studies. (www.strategic- israel.org) www.martinsherman.net

July 12, 2014 | 10 Comments »

Subscribe to Israpundit Daily Digest

Leave a Reply

10 Comments / 10 Comments

  1. thank you,

    Shalom,

    A $1000 donation from each of you will solve this problem. Help Israel to feel good about one thing. Your support!

    Ranches and farmers under attack by jackals, wolves and Arabs; they have passive European cattle that don’t fit Israel’s desert environment.

    Texas Longhorn cattle are desert cattle that solve these problems and can stop these attacks simply by threatening with their sharp horns. Support the Israel Longhorn Project help put a stop to it now. http://longhornproject.org

    The Longhorn project is the only self-sustainable nonprofit in America, I believe.

    Robin Rosenblatt
    Director – The Longhorn Project
    Nonprofit 501(c) 3 #74-3177354
    Address: 815 Hill Street, # 5
    Belmont, CA 94002
    Tel: 650.631.9270 / 03.722.6108
    robin@longhornproject.org
    http://longhornproejct.org

    I need the funds for this project in 6 weeks. I am being evicted with no place to go. It will make it impossible to help Israel with this emergency.

    For International Transfer of Funds
    Wells Fargo Bank
    420 Montgomery St.
    San Francisco California 94104
    Bank routing # 121000248
    Account # 2526430067
    Wfbius6s

    For Domestic Transfer of Funds
    Wells Fargo Bank
    420 Montgomery St.
    San Francisco California 94104
    Bank Routing # 121000248
    Account # 2526430067

    The Israel Longhorn project is helping Israeli and East African Farms and Ranches

    ? Longhorns crossbreed to Israeli cattle will create a hybrid (heterosis). This hybrid will have high quality meat and be able to function in Israel’s desert environment. Improving Israel’s cattle industry and its quality of the beef.

    ? Longhorns can eat invasive shrubs and cacti, decreasing Galilean fire hazards, and lower their feed costs.

    ? Longhorns can go further and longer with less water.

    ? Longhorns have higher reproduction rates and very low loss rates allowing Israeli ranchers to use fewer cattle and get higher incomes.

    ? Longhorns have excellent calving and mothering abilities; they can produce more & healthier calves up to 20 years.

    ? Longhorns have horns and know how to use them to protect themselves and their calves from both human and animal predators.

    ? Longhorns will first threaten the predator giving the jackal and the wolf an opportunity to reconsider.

    ? Decreasing the amount of poison used and shootings of both jackal and wolves.

    ? Longhorn will lower the high theft and loss rate. Needing fewer cowboys can protect the herd.

    ? Longhorns are highly resistant to diseases reducing their medial costs. This increases the amount of cattle that are suitable for kosher meat, fewer signs of disease and parasites.

    ? Longhorns even though they are dangerous cattle they can be trained to both voice and behavior commands. Allowing ranchers and even their children to work with them safely.

    ? Longhorns will decrease attacks on the ranches and decreasing the need for Israeli Border Police. Police instead of arresting the thieves will be rescuing them from the sharp horns of the Texas Longhorns. Changing the role of Israeli Border Police into rescuers.

    ? Longhorns can help increase agriculture production in Africa and decrease hunger.

    ? Longhorn can decrease amount antibiotics and anti parasitic medications used, as they are highly resistant to both diseases and parasites.

    ? Longhorn can help decrease the cost of meat and improve its quality. Requiring fewer antibiotics and less indications of disease in their meat.

    ? Longhorn can increase the income of the family famer and decrease their costs.

    ? We can alleviate the problem of illegal immigration from Africa. By setting up clinics where African migrants can learn the cattle trade and set up ranches at home in Africa. The Israel army can help train them to defend themselves, their village and homes creating a sort of African Pioneers.

    ? We will encourage African villagers to create self-sustainable cattle herds then with their extra cattle use them to help the next village to do the same. And repeat this over and over again.

    ? We can use Israel cattle industry to encourage young American Jews to train in Texas, and make Aliyah to work the land. Beit Shemesh area is a hot spot for American immigrants and it would be an ideal place to absorb American cattle ranchers.

    ? Employ graduates from Israeli Agriculture high schools giving them some work before they begin the army service. Reemploy them upon completion of their Army service.

    ? Longhorns will be used to help produce meat for those in Israel who cannot even afford a little meat for their Shabbat Dinner.

    ? Teaching Israeli ranchers Stockmanship, a method of moving cattle without stress using the cow or herd’s body space. This improves meat quality, increasing tenderness, increasing meat quantity. It decreases disease, meat deformity and discoloring. There are fewer dark cutters therefore, more kosher cattle.

    ? Teaching Israeli ranchers Strategic Grazing a method rotating grazing using every part of your pasture, one section at a time allowing grass and plant life to restore itself.

  2. robin@longhornproject.org Said:

    We must destroy Gaza and transfer the population either to South America or Washington DC.

    … I like you!
    🙂
    1600 Pennsylvania is VERY accommodating…
    (You know. Kefyiahs and hijabs of a feather… Flock together)

  3. @ the phoenix:
    I doubt there will be much left of the unJewish gangs after Peres vamooses in about two weeks. They can expect ever more harsh encounters. Their free run is almost over. The “State” TV and Radio” system, the core of their brain washing operation, is being gradually shut down.
    POLICE STATE: Israel has been a police state since Oslo, at least. Will that be also tackled? I do not know but I have seen in person two such entities folding and the end stage is ugly.
    Argentina’s Juntas and Pinochet’s Chile
    I Also saw in person the South African final stages before collapse.
    Elections even if here are of limited consequence, will remove much of the problem stain.

  4. @ SHmuel HaLevi 2:

    May I join the exchange?

    God Almighty, Shmuel, please do!
    As you’ve said

    And patience is way gone with the vasr majority here.

    That was ONE incident (as far as I know)
    Nonetheless, reading comments on articles posted on walla, I daresay that the number of liberal peace now crowd is NOT insignificant.
    This, on one hand.
    On the OTHER hand, as yamit has posted elsewhere, it is quite apparent that “Israel hayaffa” is for all intents and purposes a police state. The late rabbi kahane was a living proof (jailed, party dissolved, on charges of racism….)
    There are LOTS of obstacles to go through before any of what you and topaz wrote, can come to be.
    The point that sadly I am trying to make is that with such an irreconcilable difference in beliefs (very visceral), we are heading towards a different “two state solution”…
    Namely, the liberal state of tel aviv with its pride parade and the Jewish state of Judea…

  5. Saw the latest speech by N. http://vladtepesblog.com/2014/07/10/israeli-pm-binyamin-netanyahu-just-made-the-following-speech-in-front-of-the-knesset

    N. looks victim, and not the inspirational leader Israel now needs. N. speaks of a ground war (terrible!!) and no lasting consequences to the savages. He thanks the world leaders for their WORDS that Israel has the right to defend itself, Gee Thanks you guys.

    As for the march on the Knesset, 300 needs 3 million. Sadness.

  6. @ the phoenix:
    May I join the exchange?
    Indeed there was a sharp initial exchange of blows in Tel Aviv yesterday evening. And patience is way gone with the vasr majority here.
    The deviant “peace” unJewish traitors have intentionally caused enough tragedies and will hereafter taken down in the fashion required.
    Netanyahu is of course going to again betray. But the consensus is failing huge pile of bribe money that may be used to prop the lying speechster, his political run is over.

  7. @ Topaz:

    I have long said that the ONLY solution is for the people of Israel to march en masse on the Knesset and demand the military dissolve parliament.

    Dear topaz,
    Your comment mirrors precisely my thoughts and feelings.
    BUT,
    There has been a demonstration by some 300 ‘noble’, ‘ sophisticated’,’ yeffei nefesh’ in (where else?) tel aviv to END THE OPERATION IN GAZA !!!!!!!
    so much for marching on to the Knesset…
    Some 100 (normal) people came to protest against their protest. A verbal confrontation started which progressed to physical… And they had to take a break because of the siren….
    This is what I call ‘am DAFUK’
    ‘Nuff said….
    🙁

  8. Those who love Israel hear you.

    I have long said that the ONLY solution is for the people of Israel to march en masse on the Knesset and demand the military dissolve parliament. Insist that only those military leaders who stand 1000% for Israeli dominance take control and complete this war. (Demand that the structure of the government and judiciary then be redesigned to give control to the people.)

    2) Pound into rubble; lay siege. The enemy people must be made to feel the pain of ruins, and the disastrous policies of their leaders. Conduct the war as ALL other self-respecting nations. Observe total silence. Do NOT allow ONE Israeli soldier be put in harm’s way in a ground assault. When the complaints begin, reply with only one word. “NUTS!”

    3) Have only specially trained israelis do Any and ALL speaking for Israel. NO ONE else again, ever, ever, ever, ever.

    4) Send out a clarion call to young Jewish people to come to Israel and to reclaim Samaria, Judea and the Negev by demographics. Protect them.

    8) NO more FREE ANYTHING to foe or “friend”. END forever the financial and weaponry US AID.

    9) Reclaim Israeli dignity:

    Move all embassy buildings to Jerusalem; line in the sand.

    Publicly rescind apology to Turkey and offer of compensation.

    Immediately and for always, STOP discussions regarding giving away Israeli sovereignty over our holy sites to ANYONE.

    Protect ALL Jewish holy sites for the Jewish people, ABOVE all other peoples’ interests.

    Act as any other business might act, if Gaza wants a service, do it.

  9. Again. For as long as the unJewish cadre is allowed to remain in control of our State, betrayal, lies, fabrication of files, torture and a multitude of victims of peace, loss of Heritage will continue.
    The trash must be removed from government.