Monica Crowley: “This Is A Holy War”

MONICA CROWLEY: This is a holy war. This is a holy war. Whether we want to see it that way or not, whether it’s politically correct to say it or not, this is the truth. And the enemy gets a veto, they get a vote as to whether or not we’re still in this war. So this commander-in-chief can come out publicly and say, repeatedly, the war is ending, it’s over, we’re bringing home our guys.

The enemy has a vote on this and this Jihad will be perpetual until the infidel is done, gone, killed, or in submission. That is the truth of the other side. We’re in this holy war not because I’m saying it but because the enemy is saying it. We have a U.S. soldier who by all accounts now looks like he has turned and has now fighting that holy war on the other side. He better be held to account. (via The Right Scoop)

June 9, 2014 | 12 Comments »

Subscribe to Israpundit Daily Digest

Leave a Reply

12 Comments / 12 Comments

  1. honeybee Said:

    Eric Cantor has been defeated by the” Tea Party “candidate. Yeee Haaaaa

    I heard, I never liked cantor not so much for political reaosn but because he is too neat in appearance and has a Southern accent. They say he is smart but his loss showed him to be complacent and arrogant. The Tea Party won in his congressional district because only 60,000 voters out of 470,000 eligible voters tuned out to vote in an open election where anyone can vote. How many democrats and independets voted against Cantor one can only speculate but I smell some democrat games here because knocking out cantor weakens the Republican Party, sets up the political bogeyman of the democrats (tea Party) as the one responsible for Cantor’s loss….A Win Win for the Democrat party.

  2. Bear Klein Said:

    Monica Crowley has her head on straight and is certainly one of the good guys!


    An Analysis of the One Party State: At the top of the political pyramid, there is not a constant trade-off between Liberal and Conservative agendas, there is only THE Agenda.

    Perhaps the most widely proliferated truism of American patriotism is that the the two-party system is a beacon of democracy. Surely, our system is better than that of Iran, where presidential candidates must be approved by a religious council, or perhaps that of Venezuela, where the majority of the media is state-owned and disseminates propaganda in each election.

    Democrats and Republicans are widely different, it seems. At least that is what their hyper-partisan bickering would imply. Bill Clinton and Barack Obama must have be unabashed liberals, otherwise why would the Republicans despise them so much? The divide between party faithfuls of different colors runs deep, with each side blaming the entirety of the countries problems on the other, often resulting in a state of pure hatred and disgust among citizens. One only needs to turn on cable news to see this as a fact.

    However, the reality is that Republican and Democrat presidents have closely followed the same agenda for half a century. The idea that American governance alternates as a sort of give-and-take between liberalism and conservatism is nothing more than a fantasy. I do not discount that there may be serious and significant differences between democrat and republican individuals, many of them Congressmen, and certainly in state legislatures. Yet at the top of the pyramid, where the power to set agendas resides, there is only the Agenda, and the primary difference between the two parties is the speed at which ‘the Agenda’ is advanced.

    It is fascinating how Bill Clinton began his presidential campaign with playing a Saxophone on live television, talking about his foray into Marijuana, reminiscing about his protest of the Vietnam war, and ended up with perhaps the most reactionary (e.g. maintaining the status quo) administration of any president in modern history. Later, Obama entered the stage as a candidate of change, only to accelerate and consolidate the hegemony of the political elite faster than any predecessor. But lets go beyond rhetoric and examine the records of the last 5 Presidents, and see exactly how similar their platforms were.

    Read more:

  3. Crowley is a useful idiot wedded to Extreme right-wing fascist interests or she doesn’t have a clue. She supported those same Islamists by supporting Bush and Reagan.


    Israeli Nuclear Strike On Iran Turned Back ???

    By William Thomas
    Jan 18th 2007

    A recent strike by nuclear-armed Israeli Air Force fighter-bombers bound for targets in Iran was turned back after being intercepted by U.S. fighters over Iraq, this reporter has learned.

    Two sources have independently confirmed the encounter, which took place on January 7, 2007. Though the first informant offered few details beyond an initial tip, a second source long-known by this reporter to have well-placed U.S. and “non-U.S.” military and government contacts provided specific information regarding the raid, which was aimed at the radical religious ayatollahs holding ultimate power in Iran.

  4. My question who are the real enemies? The Islamist terrorists and their ideological religious determinative actions or the WEST who supports them and enables them?

    Germanizing America and the World System in Brief

    In the 1990s, under the Clinton and Blair administrations, NATO joined Germany-EU in decimating Yugoslavia and the Serbs and re-creating the Nazis’ “greater Albania” in the Balkans, now celebrated by President Bush. This Islamic terror and drug-running state, initially fronted by jihadist Alija Izetbegovic has named a street in honor of Mr. Bush who taught us that “Islam is a religion of peace.” It was with the British-created Mufti, Amin al Husseini that Hitler formed an SS division to exterminate Serbs, Jews and Roma in Yugoslavia. Al Husseini’s Arab Higher Committee later formed Fatah (“conquest”), the core of the PLO, repeatedly saved, armed, honored and enabled by Europe and the American ruling echelons. American and England seem increasingly to sway in a German-Vatican orbit. They destroy their own nations while Germany dominates Europe.

    It is noteworthy that the once-scruffy radical, Tony Blair was spiffed up and became the bridge from Bush I and Clinton to Bush II and Rodham. It was Blair who pronounced in April 1999 that the new mission of NATO was “humanitarian interventions.” A Briton is about to be ensconced as EU High commissioner in Jerusalem. As for the prospects of Ms. Rodham, the first prominent American politician to publicly call for a “Palestinian” State, the vivisection of America by the firm, Bracewell and Giuliani, if ever reported will sink the Rudy-ship raising Hillary who “has been cast as ‘tough on defense.’” Defense of what? In any case, the end-game outcome, a World Security State looms.

    Mr. Bush regularly visits Germany to correlate policy and sign documents for American– EU integration with PM Angela Merkel and Spanish EU diplomats like Jose Barroso as he did on April 30. Javier Solana, perennial EU diplomatic chief recently drove through the southern Israeli city of Sderot, now emptied of half its inhabitants, to cluck at the carnage caused by eight months of “ceasefire” Kassam rockets. (The Western-armed jihadists “fire” and the Jews “cease”). Madrid and Spain were and are main venues for the Nazi underground’s post-war sway. Note: the Bush administration brought Americans to Mesopotamia to topple Saddam (thesis) on the way to establishing Persian hegemony in the Middle East (antithesis) in order to sacrifice Israel (synthesis) to end the chaos in Mesopotamia which is said to have “no military solution.” Part of the synthesis is managed by the German-EU branch of the World Security State by its extensive sway in Tehran and Damascus. That’s Hegel (or Marx) in action. And there will be no appeal from their hand.


    Israeli Nuclear Strike On Iran Turned Back ???

    By William Thomas
    Jan 18th 2007 http://www.willthomas.net exclusive

    A recent strike by nuclear-armed Israeli Air Force fighter-bombers bound for targets in Iran was turned back after being intercepted by U.S. fighters over Iraq, this reporter has learned.

    Two sources have independently confirmed the encounter, which took place on January 7, 2007. Though the first informant offered few details beyond an initial tip, a second source long-known by this reporter to have well-placed U.S. and “non-U.S.” military and government contacts provided specific information regarding the raid, which was aimed at the radical religious ayatollahs holding ultimate power in Iran.

  5. When are we going to hear similar statements made by Israeli politicians? This is indeed a holy war and would be nice to hear that they admit it. It is possible that my memory is failing me so I don’t mind to be factually corrected.