UNCOVERDC
NH Bill Would Allow Ivermectin Without a Prescription
Lawmakers in New Hampshire have introduced a bill that would permit pharmacists to dispense the drug Ivermectin without first getting a prescription from a doctor. The proposed legislation, titled HB 1022, “AN ACT permitting pharmacists to dispense the drug Ivermectin by means of a standing order,” was first introduced on Oct. 29, 2021, by eight […]
@stevenl
You are quite correct about the AMA failing the American people, but it greatly predates the current crisis. At the onset of the outbreak, the AMA only had membership of about 14% of doctors due to their lack of representation of the medical community in general. They do, however, hold a very strong position with regards to Obamacare and the billing procedures associated with it that the AMA sponsored and which the physicians were adamantly against. People do not recognize the reality of this arrangement, but the AMA is very much tied to the Federal govt and dependent upon it. Just another cog in the machine which is viewed as a separate entity, but is actually another limb of the Federal Medical system, as captured to the Federal instructions supporting PHARMA as any other Federal medical agency . So when you hear that the AMA is supporting a lack of treatment or that they support physician license review for offering early treatment, it is just more rote dictates handed down from the Federal govt serving as a circular support of their orders which hold no validity or rational basis.
A step in the right direction.
The AMA failed the American people when it refused to oppose the insanity of the Fauci’s regime!
@peloni
The relationship you have described that exists between the regulating agencies and the pharma also exists between our dear politicians (Rep or Dem) and the giant corporations.
@Reader
I do believe that the banned treatments are quite readily available to those powerful people as they are needed. These drugs are still available with some difficulty to the the general public, so these medical overlords will have no trouble accessing them. The monoclonal antibodies are less likely to be readily available, but also not impossible.
The relationship between PHARMA and the CDC/FDA is quite well established. Depending on the year, PHARMA pays between 40-60% of the budget of these agencies, but it is more complicated than even this. The close relationship that necessarily forms between the regulating bodies and the drug companies that they are responsible for regulating leaves them the opportunity of developing quid pro quo arrangements. The agency leadership, if they are not too independent, are never left unemployed for very long, as PHARMA always finds a well paying position to award their former overlords. The open nature of the captured status between these agencies and the groups they are intended to regulate is quite disturbing, and it has been this way for a very long time.
Bills to make IVM and HCQ available over-the-counter now being considered in Oklahoma and Missouri.
@peloni
What do you want to bet that the “right people” will get any and all “banned” treatments if and when they need them?
I read somewhere that both FDA and CDC are financed by Pfizer.
FDA Revokes Authorization on Two Monoclonal Antibodies
This is absolutely premeditated murder. People will die because these drugs are not being allowed to be administered to the public. The monoclonal antibodies are now to be numbered among the treatments that will not be used to treat the public. In truth they are the only treatment that were being allowed by the medical tyrants that actually made a difference in improving patient survival rates. The steroids employed are a rediculously small dose and remdisivir is noted to kill more than it saves, with only 25% of people living thru two doses of the toxic crap.
Omicron is a much more mild form of disease, but Delta is still out there and Delta is much more debilitating and much less lethal after the use of monoclonal antibodies early in the disease. In fact, with the removal of monoclonal antibodies, there is once again no early treatment being allowed by these villains.
People will die because of this change in treatment and others who only suffer severe disease might be alleviated the serious damage to their health due to the lack of monoclonals being used and there is absolutely no reason to do so.
I’ll believe it when I see it.
Should have been allowed at the start of epidemic. Dr. Zelenco was right.
As much damage as has been done, and as much needless death as has been caused with immeasurable sufferings, and inscrutable amount of long term health complications as has been generated to hundreds of millions of people betrayed by the ongoing efforts of their own govts to block and obstruct any fair treatment from innocuous medications, this law could allow doctors to reclaim their authority to do what is right and correct for their patient based on their medical expertise, and once again practice the art of medicine to treat Covid. It seems so impossible that all that is needed to end this pandemic is something so simple as a law allowing doctors the right to use a drug that they believe is safe and effective to treat a disease that has been left to fester and mutate as a pretext to all the tragedy that has occurred over the past two years. It does seem impossible, but this is the tragedy in which we are living today. Pass this law in New Hampshire, in Texas, in Montana, in Germany, in the UK, in Israel or anywhere in the world, and the people will begin to benefit from the return of medical practice regarding Covid. Til they try to do this again, that is.