Israeli Sovereignty Over the Temple Mount Is Crucial for Peace
T. Belman. Frisch embraces sovereignty and rejects power sharing because it doesn’t work. I see it differently. Islam demands submission of all to Islam. Any power sharing arrangement that they agree to is seen as temporary until it is strong enough to demand more power and ultimately domination. They have learnt that the more they terrorize and agitate, the more concessions they can wring out of the dominant power. The west in general and Israel in particular must not cede them any power. We are sovereign and they must accept it. No power sharing.
Greenblatt, Kushner, and other meddlers, stay home. If you want to help us, support us.
By Prof Hillel Frisch, BESA
BESA Center Perspectives Paper No. 539, July 24, 2017
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Regardless of its direct security merits, Israel’s decision to place metal detectors at the entrances to the Temple Mount has been transformed by adversaries and Israel alike into an issue of sovereignty over the Temple Mount. Power-sharing there has always constituted a slippery slope to disaster. The murder of two Israeli policemen at the Temple Mount is an appropriate moment to rectify the situation by reasserting Israeli sovereignty over the holy site.



