T. Belman. Wise says that well meaning friends of Israel reject the one state solution because “immediately or shortly thereafter create an Arab-majority state, ridding the country of its Jewish identity. Furthermore, it has been said, failure to grant full citizenship to all residents of the West Bank would turn Israel into an “apartheid state.”
Some well meaning friends do believe this but there are other well meaning friends who don’t want Israel to be home to an Arab population that amounts to 35% of Israel’s population, citizens or not. They prefer to fight for a solution that supports compensated emigration for Arabs. What they will settle for in the end remains to be seen. Perhaps a staged process. Perhaps, a combination of Wise’s One State Solution which is supported by Glick with a compensated emigration plan proposed by Moshe Feiglin. His plan allows for some citizenship. Martin Sherman’s plan allows for no citizenship.
By Michael L Wise, ALGEMEINER
There is now almost unanimous rejection of the “two-state solution” — the creation of a sovereign Palestinian state on any part of the former west bank of the Hashemite Kingom of Transjordan (Judea and Samaria). Regional violence and terror has made it clear to almost all objective observers that a Palestinian state would ultimately fall into the hands of terrorist entities such as Hamas, Fatah, ISIS, Hezbollah or al-Qaida, and would result in a catastrophic conflict.
The “one-state” alternative, according to which Israel declares sovereignty over Judea and Samaria, would — say both well-meaning friends of Israel and its enemies — immediately or shortly thereafter create an Arab-majority state, ridding the country of its Jewish identity. Furthermore, it has been said, failure to grant full citizenship to all residents of the West Bank would turn Israel into an “apartheid state.”
Read more…