State Department officials quitting over “complete and utter disdain for our expertise”

Break out the champagne:

By Robert Spencer, JIHAD WATCH

The New York Times reported last Friday that “an exodus is underway” in the State Department. The Times didn’t think this was good news; it gave space to one career diplomat who lamented that there was “complete and utter disdain for our expertise.”

This could be the best news to come out of Washington since the Trump administration took office.

We can only hope that with the departure of these failed State Department officials, their failed policies will be swept out along with them. Chief among these is the almost universally held idea that poverty causes terrorism. The United States has wasted uncounted (literally, because a great deal of it was in untraceable bags full of cash) billions of dollars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Egypt, and other countries in the wrongheaded assumption that Muslims turn to jihad because they lack economic opportunities and education. American officials built schools and hospitals, thinking that they were winning over the hearts and minds of the locals.

Fifteen years, thousands of lives and hundreds of billions of dollars later, no significant number of hearts and minds have been won. This is partly because the premise is wrong. The New York Times reported in March that “not long after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001…Alan B. Krueger, the Princeton economist, tested the widespread assumption that poverty was a key factor in the making of a terrorist. Mr. Krueger’s analysis of economic figures, polls, and data on suicide bombers and hate groups found no link between economic distress and terrorism.”

CNS News noted in September 2013 that “according to a Rand Corporation report on counterterrorism, prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense in 2009, ‘Terrorists are not particularly impoverished, uneducated, or afflicted by mental disease. Demographically, their most important characteristic is normalcy (within their environment). Terrorist leaders actually tend to come from relatively privileged backgrounds.’ One of the authors of the RAND report, Darcy Noricks, also found that according to a number of academic studies, ‘Terrorists turn out to be more rather than less educated than the general population.’”

Yet the analysis that poverty causes terrorism has been applied and reapplied and reapplied again. The swamp is in dire need of draining, and in other ways as well. From 2011 on, it was official Obama administration policy to deny any connection between Islam and terrorism. This came as a result of an October 19, 2011 letter from Farhana Khera of Muslim Advocates to John Brennan, who was then the Assistant to the President on National Security for Homeland Security and Counter Terrorism, and later served in the Obama administration as head of the CIA. The letter was signed not just by Khera, but by the leaders of virtually all the significant Islamic groups in the United States: 57 Muslim, Arab, and South Asian organizations, many with ties to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, including the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), the Muslim American Society (MAS), the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), Islamic Relief USA; and the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC).

The letter denounced what it characterized as U.S. government agencies’ “use of biased, false and highly offensive training materials about Muslims and Islam.” Despite the factual accuracy of the material about which they were complaining, the Muslim groups demanded that the task force “purge all federal government training materials of biased materials”; “implement a mandatory re-training program for FBI agents, U.S. Army officers, and all federal, state and local law enforcement who have been subjected to biased training”; and moreto ensure that all that law enforcement officials would learn about Islam and jihad would be what the signatories wanted them to learn.

Numerous books and presentations that gave a perfectly accurate view of Islam and jihad were removed from coounterterror training. Today, even with Trump as President, this entrenched policy of the U.S. government remains, and ensures that all too many jihadists simply cannot be identified as risks, since the officials are bound as a matter of policy to ignore what in saner times would be taken as warning signs. Trump and Tillerson must reverse this. Trump has spoken often about the threat from “radical Islamic terrorism”; he must follow through and remove the prohibitions on allowing agents to study and understand the motivating ideology behind the jihad threat.

The swamp needs draining indeed. This news from the State Department, and the New York Times’ grief over it, are good signs that the U.S. is on its way back on dry land.

 

 

“The Desperation of Our Diplomats,” by Roger Cohen, New York Times, July 28, 2017:

WASHINGTON — On the first Friday in May, Foreign Affairs Day, the staff gathers in the flag-bedecked C Street lobby of the State Department beside the memorial plaques for the 248 members of foreign affairs agencies who have lost their lives in the line of duty. A moment of silence is observed. As president of the American Foreign Service Association, Barbara Stephenson helps organize the annual event. This year, she was set to enter a delegates’ lounge to brief Secretary of State Rex Tillerson on its choreography before appearing alongside him. Instead, she told me, she was shoved out of the room.

Stephenson, a former ambassador to Panama, is not used to being manhandled at the State Department she has served with distinction for more than three decades. She had been inclined to give Tillerson the benefit of the doubt. Transitions between administrations are seldom smooth, and Tillerson is a Washington neophyte, unversed in diplomacy, an oilman trying to build a relationship with an erratic boss, President Trump.

Still, that shove captured the rudeness and remoteness that have undermined trust at Foggy Bottom. Stephenson began to understand the many distressed people coming to her “asking if their service is still valued.” The lack of communication between the secretary and the rest of the building has been deeply disturbing.

An exodus is underway. Those who have departed include Nancy McEldowney, the director of the Foreign Service Institute until she retired last month, who described to me “a toxic, troubled environment and organization”; Dana Shell Smith, the former ambassador to Qatar, who said what was most striking was the “complete and utter disdain for our expertise”; and Jake Walles, a former ambassador to Tunisia with some 35 years of experience. “There’s just a slow unraveling of the institution,” he told me

July 31, 2017 | 13 Comments »

Subscribe to Israpundit Daily Digest

Leave a Reply

13 Comments / 13 Comments

  1. @ Ted Belman: I notice that Ms. Stephanson complains about having been “manhandles,” but does not say that she has reigned or been fired! As for the other three names given by the odious Roger Cohen, it is hard to know if any of them had been forced out, or had simply reached retirement age. Retirement can be very lucrative for a State Department retiree, as they can quickly transition to higher-paid jobs for foreign governments, such as Qatar (to which one of the three was allegedly the Ambassador). This hardly adds up to an “exodus.”

  2. @ Michael S:
    I just saw a gripping dramatization of the Wansee Conference made for Amazon Instant Video also avalable as a DVD, called “Conspiracy”. In it, at one point somebody makes an angry comment about lawyers. Somebody else asks, how many lawyers in the room, and nearly everybody — including the guy who attacked lawyers — raises their hand. Stars Stanly Tucci as Eichmann and Kenneth Branagh as Heydrich — which is really ironic since Branagh and his ex-wife Emma Thompson are anti-Israel bigots who signed a letter demanding that an Israeli Shakespeare company be expelled from a UK international Shakespeare festival. But, then, in their fantasy world, we are the Nazis, and the Palestinian Arabs who helped Hitler mass-murder us, and are still at it, are the Jews!

    “And I’m not a cab-driver, I’m a coffee pot!” – Last line of “Arsenic and Old Lace”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YknMqaT83h4&list=RDYknMqaT83h4#t=14

    (Arsenic and Old Lace (1944) – IMDb
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0036613/
    Comedy · A drama critic learns on his wedding day that his beloved maiden aunts are homicidal. Cary Grant, Priscilla Lane, Raymond Massey, Peter Lorre. Also on Amazon Instant Video. $2.99 to rent.)

  3. “January 20, 1942: The Wannsee Conference set a new course for how the Nazis would deal with the Jews. Wannsee, a suburb outside Berlin, was where the “Final Solution” was formulated: the complete elimination of the Jewish People.

    “The drafted document contained 16 signatures from all the upper ministries of the German establishment. Of these 16 signatories, eight held PhD’s. Similarly, 43% of the concentration camp officers were either MD’s or PhD’s. Goebbels, the propaganda minister, had three PhD’s.”

    http://www.aish.com/ho/o/48960431.html

    So much for terrorism being the work of the poor and uneducated.

  4. The demo are doing a good job to impoverish the US low and middle classes! And they already know that it will NOT trigger home-grown terrorism.

  5. @ deanblake:
    You sound like yet another scatter brained leftist, but your point about rich people looking for capital preservation deserves further comment.

    The risk-free, typically tax-advantaged investments coveted by rich folks are so often found in municipal (government) bonds which are floated (by politically connected underwriters) in order to finance public projects, such as roads and .. SKOOLZ.

    Big Government always works for the 1%.

  6. So the alternative is to allow people to remain uneducated and in ill health, while paying high taxes for armaments technology to rich people can get richer? That is the same plan Trump has for Americans. I don’t like it. Rich people are not smart because they are rich, they are just as likely to lose it all, which is why they want ‘safe’ places to park their money like in insurance companies that ‘spin’ the money for a safely fixed percent. screw that!!!

  7. A government bureaucrat complained about a complete and utter disdain for our expertise.

    Government bureaucrats think that they know it all.

    Their expertise is in making life miserable for ordinary citizens. In the case of foreign affairs bureaucrats, ordinary folks in every part of the world.

  8. An exodus is underway.

    This is fantastic news.

    We must remember, however, that any tax money the Government “saves” by not spending (wasting) it on X, will only be squandered on Y.

    The Government should REBATE the money to taxpayers.