Save the midterms and stop communism

PELONI:  It is an interesting phenomenon to hear claims that America is about to elect its own demise by willfully returning to the tragedy from which its fat has recently been saved from the fire in the last election.  In a fair fight, there would be no contest, and yet, as managed expectations are being managed in the current election polls, the foreboding concern of another rigged election weighs ever present as the chief accomplishment set before Trump’s 2024 election remains yet to be obtained – the reestablishment of election integrity & accountability in America, and the simultaneous return of governance by the will of the people rather than by the will of those who control the election machines and the vote counting.  Are we truly about to see a return of what followed the 2018 election?  America, vote as if you very existence is at stake…because it is.

The only way to maintain constitutional liberty is for every conservative to vote against the Democrats, whom the DSA now owns lock, stock, and barrel.

Robin M. Itzler | Am Thinker | September 30, 2026

Click Image to Enlarge. Image created via AI.

The midterms will come down to turnout: Republicans versus communists. We can call Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) a minority organization led by loud agitators, but their ignorant followers are enthusiastic about bringing communism to the United States of America. Many DSA candidates happily admit this in interviews and at rallies.

Remember, in the last century Lenin’s communists in Russia, Hitler’s Nazis in Germany, and Castro’s Ortodoxos in Cuba also started as minority organizations with loud agitators leading enthusiastic ignorant followers.

Whether a Democrat candidate is a DSA member doesn’t matter. In the 2026 midterm elections, the DSA owns every Democrat candidate.

Is the DSA communist agenda what YOU want for America? For your children and grandchildren?

    • Replace the presidency and the Supreme Court with Congress

 

    • Abolish the Senate

 

    • Abolish the Electoral College

 

    • Allow non-citizens to vote

 

    • Defund the police as a pathway to closing prisons

 

    • Give the vote to prison inmates

 

    • Abolish ICE and grant amnesty to illegal aliens

 

    • Nationalize the economy with public ownership of our largest corporations and industries

 

    • Implement a Green New Deal that phases out successful American energy

 

    • Medicare for All (seniors can say goodbye to their Medicare)

 

    • Make “gender-affirming care” a federal entitlement

 

    • Codify Roe, erasing all limits on abortion

 

    • Impose a 32-hour work week (with no cut in pay); provide family leave and multiple benefits

 

    • Social housing that includes rent control (individuals/corporations will not be landlords)

 

    • Free college; cancel student loans

 

    • Reparations for people who were never slaves paid by people who were never slave owners

 

    • Second Reconstruction based on race

 

    • Defund the War Department

 

    • Abandon Israel

 

    • Promote a Palestinian nation with Jerusalem as its capital

 

    • Investigate and impeach to reverse all of President Trump’s successes

In November, voters are being asked: Does the United States of America continue as a constitutional republic, or will we veer toward communism?

To continue as a constitutional Republic, Republican turnout is the only way to stop the spread of communism in the United States. Republicans who sit home for the midterms will be responsible for the destruction of our great nation. It’s all in the numbers:

    • If 65 percent of Republicans vote, we win! If only 35 percent of Republicans vote, we lose.

 

    • If 75 percent of Republicans vote, we get a robust congressional majority that lets us pass legislation, not a slim majority that makes it hard to pass legislation in either the House or Senate.

 

    • If 80 percent of Republicans vote, we would have a supermajority to pass President Trump’s America First agenda and stop communist Democrats.

To keep Congress and stop the communist onslaught, we need everyone to vote, and that means Christians must vote. In “66 Million Christians Stayed Home in 2024. Don’t Let It Happen Again in 2026,” Peggy Tierney shares:

Roughly two-thirds of American adults still identify as Christian. That is on the order of 166 million potential voters. Yet large shares sit out. Some 66 million Christians and 32 million regular churchgoing Christians did not vote in 2024. Why? Lack of interest, dislike of candidates, and the belief that “my vote doesn’t matter” topped the reasons.

While Christians as a whole made up a large majority of the 2024 electorate and delivered a decisive share of Trump’s support, the fact that 66 MILLION Christians stayed home is disturbing.

Glenn Beck made it very clear in a September 22, 2026 “X” post what Christians of faith must do or else we are giving our country to the progressive/Islamist cabal:

Earlier this summer, CAIR launched a massive get-out-the-vote operation targeting 3 million Muslim voters. They are camping out at mosques in crucial swing states after Friday prayers to register voters and drive them to the polls.

Now, all of this is completely legal. I’m not claiming anything nefarious. But my question is this: Christian pastors, what are YOU doing about it?

There are 32 million Christians who go to church every single Sunday and don’t vote. CAIR is hunting for 3 million, and we have 32 million sitting in our own pews staying home! “

Pastors, stop hiding behind the Johnson Amendment. The law has never stopped you from putting a registration table in the lobby or preaching on biblical principles. If you preach that the culture is collapsing 52 Sundays a year, but you never once tell your congregation to get out of the pew and go vote, you’re not a shepherd. You’re a weatherman. Put a table in the lobby this Sunday. One volunteer, one clipboard, one laptop. Load up the church van and drive people to the polls. Stop complaining and start showing up.”

Get out the vote however you can. Frequent local community sites to distribute candidate material. Volunteer to make calls or knock on doors, as those 1:1 conversations are very important. For election integrity, be a poll watcher. Most importantly, talk to people, including your priest, minister, or rabbi, to see how you can help mobilize a get-out-the-vote program!

Many people share that their clergy insists on keeping politics out of the church or synagogue. That’s nice in theory; however, progressive ministers, priests, and rabbis have no qualms about giving sermons that promote the leftist agenda. Why do conservative clergy insist on separating politics and religion while progressive clergy, many partnering with Islamists, are vocal about their leftist political agenda? Religion would be the first to go if DSA ever got into power.

President Trump and his outstanding administration cannot do it alone. They need our help. America First Patriots can save the United States, and it all comes down to Republican turnout. The country we save will be our own!

October 1, 2026 | 9 Comments »

Leave a Reply

9 Comments / 9 Comments

  1. “…Florence Hazrat, the author of “On the Mark: From Periods to Interrobangs, How Punctuation Remade the World” (Basic), would wish to point out that the difference for the reader in these two versions of “Persuasion” is entirely a function of the punctuation.

    If punctuation played a role in everything, what about, say, the war in Gaza? Hazrat finds a link. “Punctuation marks in Hebrew,” she explains, “are relics of a brutal colonial system that is far from over.” Adding punctuation turned Hebrew into a spoken language, “paving the way for an artificial sense of unity among Jewish people from all over the globe, encouraging them to move to the land that already had people—a people made to suffer and bear the brunt of European anti-Semitism in the most horrendous ways for generations.” It seems (the reason is not altogether clear) that, had Yiddish been the official language of Israel, atrocities might have been avoided.
    Zionist complicities aside, Hazrat is a punctuation enthusiast, though there are a few marks that she is not very fond of. The semicolon is one. She calls it “a dreamy kind of mark for meandering minds…”

    – “The Curious Power of Punctuation”
    “Commas, dashes, semicolons, and spaces have shaped how we read for centuries. What happens when machines start crafting the sentences?”
    By Louis Menand
    September 21, 2026

    https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/09/28/on-the-mark-louis-menand-book-review

    My comment: This why arts, humanities, and social sciences department of universities infected by antizionist antisemitism have to go.

    Bravo, Bravissimo, President Trump; keep up the good work!

  2. Save the midterms and stop the Jihad.

    Ardie Geldman on FB:

    “Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand wore a hijab during a visit last week to a Bronx mosque where the powerful New York Democrat sat alongside a cleric who once celebrated Hamas for “causing so much trouble for the Jews” and has hailed Osama bin Laden’s spiritual mentor.

    Gillibrand, who chairs the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, appeared at the Bronx Muslim Center, located in New York City’s “Little Yemen,” on Sept. 21, according to photos posted by the center’s outreach director. The photos show Gillibrand wearing a pink headscarf and seated next to Hamud Alsilwi, a Yemeni cleric who has led the Bronx Muslim Center since 1998. A banner soliciting donations for the center’s new 32,000-square-foot mosque is seen in the photos that prominently featured the senator.

    The Bronx mosque is a branch of the Muslim American Society, which federal prosecutors have described as an “overt arm” of the Muslim Brotherhood in the United States.

    Alsilwi has praised Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood and hailed Sheikh Abdul Majeed al-Zindani, an influential Islamic scholar designated as a terrorist over his ties to bin Laden.

    “The Muslim Brotherhood came to power in Palestine, and they harmed no one except the Jews and Israel,” Alsilwi wrote in October 2016, according to an English translation of his post.

    In social media posts in January 2016, Alsilwi praised Hamas founder Ahmed Yassin—who was killed in an Israeli airstrike after being linked to multiple murders—for “causing so much trouble for the Jews in Palestine,” the Middle East Forum reported in 2024, after Rep. Ritchie Torres (D., N.Y.) secured $1 million in earmarks for the Bronx Muslim Center.

    Alsilwi mourned al-Zindani after his death in April 2024, posting numerous photos and videos of the cleric, referring to him as an “eminent scholar” and praying, “O God, grant him spacious gardens in Paradise.”

    The U.S. government designated al-Zindani a terrorist in 2004 over his position as spiritual adviser to bin Laden and for allegedly recruiting al Qaeda members and aiding “the purchase of weapons on behalf of al-Qaeda and other terrorists.”

    Gillibrand has not promoted her Bronx mosque visit on social media or her Senate website, though she posted footage from other events she attended the same day in East Harlem and the Bronx. Those photos show Gillibrand wearing the same suit as the one at the Bronx Muslim Center, sans hijab.

    “It was an honor to welcome U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand to Little Yemen today and have her spend time directly with members of our community,” wrote Yahay Obeid, the mosque’s director of outreach.

    Other prominent New York lawmakers have faced criticism for wearing hijabs. President Donald Trump and New York gubernatorial candidate Bruce Blakeman excoriated Gov. Kathy Hochul (D.) last month for donning a hijab at an event for the Islamic Cultural Center of Manhattan’s Upper East Side.

    “Hijab Hochul. Kathy’s Latest Costume: Whatever the Audience Wants,” wrote Blakeman.

    Trump called Hochul the “Worst Governor in the Country,” and said she “wears the hijab” to “get the Arab Vote.”

    Conservatives and human rights activists blasted Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D., N.Y.) earlier this year for sporting a hijab at an outdoor Eid event. Masih Alinejad, an Iranian dissident, accused the “Squad” leader of hypocrisy for wearing the hijab while claiming “to fight for women’s self-determination.”

    Gillibrand’s office and the Bronx Muslim Center did not respond to requests for comment.”

    https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1548388593982097&set=a.637474631740169&type=3

  3. Many of these points have been in the govenmental practice of Western governments since 1945 at least for some years.
    Several of the points are US Constitutional points and NOT Communist.
    The only outright Communist point is the nationalisation of most major corporations.
    If you inflate the misuse of the word “Communsm” you will end up with it by opening the door to the entryists.
    Read the list of bullet points at the end of Ch 2 (?) of the Communist Manifesto and note we all in the West already have steeply progressive income tax; have ended child factory labour and have universal schooling for children. New Deal also scooped up a lot of unemployed to build the Tenessee Valley Authority and several other similar schemes inte recovery from the – purely capitalist mismanagement – Great Depression.

    1

  4. Ironic, isn’t it? Because the American right wing Zionist camp is so firmly wedded to its frankly irrelevant free-marketeer domestic opinions, it’s giving the Jihad an opening. In different eras. People thought different sets of issues went together, inseparably.

    I will be voting Republican for Congress as I always do, despite my disagreement on these 3 traditional bread and butter safety net issues.One must choose one’s battles. There was a time when Republicans had no problem winning New York.

  5. Query: Does Israel’s Right oppose universal healthcare?

    AI Overview
    Israel’s political right does not oppose universal health care.

    Universal health coverage has been firmly established in Israel since the passage of the National Health Insurance Law in 1995, under the government led by the Labor Party’s Yitzhak Rabin. Across the Israeli political spectrum—including right-wing and nationalist parties like Likud—the universal public-private hybrid model (Israel’s system of four non-profit health maintenance organizations, or Kupat Holim) enjoys broad consensus and is not a matter of partisan political debate.
    Structure of the Israeli System
    • Universal Mandate: By law, every permanent resident is entitled to a standardized basket of health care services regardless of income, age, or pre-existing conditions.
    • Pluralistic Delivery: Rather than a purely state-run National Health Service, the system relies on four regulated, competing non-profit health plans funded through progressive national health taxes.
    • Political Consensus: Mainstream right-wing politicians support maintaining universal coverage, though debates occasionally occur over the level of public funding versus private supplemental insurance and out-of-pocket costs.

    • Query: Does Israel’s right oppose universal free college?

      Google:

      AI Overview
      Israel’s political right does not campaign to abolish the country’s existing system of heavily state-subsidized higher education, but right-leaning policymakers and free-market think tanks (such as the Kohelet Policy Forum) have frequently criticized the current model for promoting “over-education” and bloating public spending.
      Current Funding Reality in Israel
      • Not Fully Free: College and university in Israel are not entirely free or universal for all citizens by default.
      • State Subsidies: Undergraduate tuition at public universities is heavily capped and subsidized by the government, costing roughly NIS 11,500 to 12,000 (approx. $3,000–$3,500 USD) per year.
      • Discounts for Service: Israelis who complete their mandatory military or national service receive substantial additional tuition vouchers and discounts, especially for their first year.
      Perspectives from the Right
      • Market Skepticism: Right-wing and libertarian economic publications in Israel argue that heavy state subsidization channels an excess number of young adults into academic tracks rather than vital vocational or technical training.
      • Institutional Friction: Right-wing politicians have frequently clashed with major public universities over governance, budgetary autonomy, and perceived political bias, leading to legislative efforts by governing coalitions to increase state oversight of university budgeting rather than expand or privatize tuition completely.

      • Query: Does Israel have a completely free market housing policy?

        Google:

        AI Overview
        No, Israel does not have a completely free market housing policy; instead, the state heavily controls land ownership, planning, and allocation while utilizing various interventionist and subsidized programs.
        Key Characteristics of Israel’s Housing Market
        • State Land Ownership: The vast majority of land in Israel (around 93%) is publicly owned by the state and managed by the Israel Land Authority (ILA), meaning buyers typically purchase long-term leases rather than the underlying land itself.
        • Centralized Planning: Housing development and zoning are governed by a centralized, national planning system rather than purely decentralized municipal or market-driven forces.
        • Government Subsidies and Price Controls: The Israeli government frequently implements programs—such as subsidized housing lotteries (Mehir LaMishtaken or target price programs)—to offer discounted apartments to eligible buyers, actively intervening in market pricing.
        • Public and Social Housing: Despite large-scale privatization trends since the late 20th century, the state maintains a residual public housing sector and provides rental assistance frameworks for vulnerable populations.
        If you would like to explore this further, let me know if you are interested in:
        • How the Israel Land Authority
        impacts housing supply and property prices
        • Details on government-subsidized buyer programs like Target Price

        • Query: Is the U.S. the only developed democratic nation without universal healthcare?

          AI Overview
          Yes, the United States is the only high-income, industrialized democratic nation (specifically among OECD and wealthy peer countries) without a system of universal health care.
          Key Details of the U.S. Health System
          • Coverage Gap: Millions of U.S. residents remain uninsured or underinsured, unlike citizens in peer nations like Canada, the U.K., Germany, and Australia where care or insurance is guaranteed for everyone.
          • Fragmented Public Programs: The U.S. provides public coverage through specific programs—such as Medicare for older adults, Medicaid for low-income individuals, and the Veterans Health Administration—rather than a single unified universal system.
          • Cost and Outcomes: Studies from organizations like the Commonwealth Fund show that the U.S. spends the most per capita on health care globally yet lags behind other wealthy democracies in overall health outcomes, life expectancy, and administrative efficiency.

  6. I will be voting Republican for Congress, as usual, even though I disagree on Universal Healthcare (should be Medicaid not Medicare which is partial and expensive even with a Medigap) , rent control, and free education at all levels, though I think trade schools should be prioritized over college. I agree with President Trump there. For obvious reasons.

    It’s interesting how in different eras, different sets of issues are conflated as though they must go together.

    I asked Google which of the above list Michael Harrington would have opposed. The answer is flawed since the Woke insanity wasn’t even on anybody’s agenda. But still…
    AI Overview
    Based on historical facts and the political philosophy of Michael Harrington, he would have opposed the following positions listed in your prompt:
    • Replace the presidency and the Supreme Court with Congress (Harrington was a constitutional democrat who advocated working within the American political system, often described as “the left wing of the possible.” He rejected ultra-radical overhauls of the U.S. Constitution or authoritarian centralization).
    • Abolish the Senate (Similar to the above, Harrington sought progressive reform and “visionary gradualism” via democratic institutions rather than eliminating whole branches or houses of government).
    • Defund the War Department (While a consistent critic of specific American military interventions like the Vietnam War, Harrington was a strong anti-Stalinist and Cold War social democrat who recognized the necessity of national defense and explicitly distanced himself from pacifist or anti-imperialist factions that sought to entirely dismantle U.S. defense structures).
    • Abandon Israel (Harrington was an outspoken Zionist who firmly supported Israel on democratic socialist grounds throughout his life).
    • Promote a Palestinian nation with Jerusalem as its capital (His Middle East views aligned closely with the mainstream, pro-Israel bipartisan consensus of his era).
    Context
    Michael Harrington (1928–1989) was the founder of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA). His political strategy centered around “realignment”—reforming the Democratic Party from within by aligning with organized labor and civil rights movements to expand the New Deal welfare state.
    Because he rejected total state control of the economy and authoritarian models of government, his version of democratic socialism was fundamentally anchored in traditional American democratic governance. Many of the other items on your list—such as implementing universal healthcare (Medicare for All), progressive labor laws (a 32-hour work week), or expanding public housing and free education—reflect core social-democratic policies that he championed during his life.