Peloni: Shame on Schumer!
by Rafael Medoff
Israeli ambassador Abba Eban was greeted by an irritating sight when he rose to speak in Harvard University’s Sanders Hall on a chilly Tuesday evening in the autumn of 1970. A group of anti-Israel extremists in the gallery had unfurled a banner denouncing “Zionist imperialists” and tried to shout Eban down when he began to speak.
Half a century later, another group of extremists, including Zohran Mamdani—now the Democratic nominee for mayor of New York City—employed similar tactics in their own anti-Israel protests.
Senate minority leader Charles Schumer has cited Eban’s response to the Israel-haters as a transformative event in his own political life. Schumer’s very different response to the Israel-hater Mamdani reflects his own curious transformation.
Schumer, who in 1970 was a Harvard undergraduate, was in the audience the night Eban spoke. He was so moved by the ambassador’s rebuke of the radicals that he spoke about it at length in what was arguably the most important speech of his life, delivered on the senate floor in November 2023.
As Schumer rose to speak that day, anti-Israel protests, often mixing with blatant antisemitism, were erupting on college campuses and beyond. Schumer, who by then was the senate majority leader, was shocked at the refusal of many of his fellow-Democrats to acknowledge that antisemitism was coming from their own political camp.
The reality, Schumer told his visibly discomfited colleagues, was that the people expressing antisemitism after the October 7 massacres “are in many cases people that most liberal Jewish Americans felt previously were their ideological fellow travelers.” He continued: “The vitriol against Israel in the wake of October 7th is all too often crossing a line into brazen and widespread antisemitism, the likes of which we haven’t seen for generations in this country—if ever.”
Sen. Schumer then recalled with admiration the way Ambassador Eban responded to the hecklers in 1970. “Eban pointed his finger up at the protesters in the gallery, and with his Etonian inflection, he calmly but strongly delivered a statement I will never forget,” Schumer recalled.
Schumer then quoted Eban’s words: “I am talking to you up there in the gallery. Every time a people gets their statehood, you applaud it. The Nigerians, the Pakistanis, the Zambians, you applaud their getting statehood. There’s only one people, when they gain statehood, who you don’t applaud, you condemn it— and that is the Jewish people. We Jews are used to that. We have lived with a double standard through the centuries. There were always things the Jews couldn’t do. . . . Everyone could be a farmer, but not the Jew. Everyone could be a carpenter, but not the Jew. Everyone could move to Moscow, but not the Jew. And everyone can have their own state, but not the Jew. There is a word for that: antisemitism, and I accuse you in the gallery of it.”
The audience of more than 2,000 “broke into heavy applause,” The Harvard Crimson reported. Young Charles Schumer never forgot that moment. The episode helped shape Schumer’s subsequent career as a Democratic member of Congress who was known as a staunch supporter of Israel.
Zohran Mamdani carved a very different path in college, and then in politics. At Bowdoin College in Maine, he co-founded the campus chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine, a group that calls Palestinian Arab terrorists “resistance fighters” and advocates replacing Israel with “Palestine.” SJP later was the primary organizer of the pro-Hamas campus rallies following the October 7 massacres.
In an op-ed for the Bowdoin student newspaper in January 2014, Mamdani referred to what he called “more than 60 years of Israeli colonial occupation of Palestine.” Note the number he used. In the view of Mamdani and his SJP friends, the very establishment of a tiny Jewish state 66 years earlier, in 1948, constituted an illegal “colonial occupation.” The existence of Israel—not a dispute over territories or settlements—is what they reject.
It’s not uncommon for college students to embrace radical causes. But usually they outgrow their youthful militancy after they graduate and enter the world beyond the Ivory Tower. Unfortunately, Zohran Mamdani never shed his extremism.
The day after the October 7 attacks, Mamdani wrote (on X) that Israel’s “occupation” was the real cause of what he called “the ongoing violence in Israel and Palestine.” During the weeks that followed, Mamdani posted dramatic accounts of his participation in various demonstrations accusing Israel of “genocide.” That was before even a single Israeli soldier had stepped foot in Gaza. For Mamdani and company, Israel’s very existence is an act of “genocide.”
The protests in which Mamdani participated were intended to make the lives of ordinary Americans miserable. Mamdani and his fellow-extremists blocked the entrance to the New York Stock Exchange, tried to shut down Grand Central Station, and were arrested for blocking traffic outside the home of a U.S. senator to protest his support for Israel’s existence. It was the home of Senator Charles Schumer.
Yet last week, Schumer responded to Mamdani’s primary victory by showering him with praise. Schumer boasted that he and Mamdani have “worked together” on some legislation, and he hailed Mamdani’s “impressive campaign that connected with New Yorkers.” He didn’t say a word about Mamdani’s obsessive hatred of the Jewish state—the very sentiment that Abba Eban had denounced as antisemitic.
To prove his loyalty to his party, and no doubt to fend off challenges from Mamdani supporters (such as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez), Sen. Schumer has chosen to join them rather than fight them. It’s a classic political move—cold, calculated, and contradicting everything Schumer said previously about the current sources of antisemitism.
Thus it would appear Charles Schumer has come full circle. After boldly chastising his fellow-Democrats for ignoring antisemitism on the left for political reasons, Schumer will now be remembered for doing exactly that.
Dr. Medoff is founding director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies and author of more than 20 books about Jewish history and the Holocaust. His book The Road to October 7: Hamas, the Holocaust, and the Eternal War Against the Jews will be published on October 1, 2025, by The Jewish Publication Society / University of Nebraska Press.
Frances Fox Piven – Discover the Networks
Reminiscent of Trotsky’s strategy of transitionsl demands that sound reasonable but which cannot be satisfied under capitalism as a method of awakening proletarian class consciessness modified to conditions in which the proletariat (factory workers) are no longer most of the country and non-revolutionary for the most part so other constituencies are continually sought.
https://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individuals/frances-fox-piven/
“The Cloward-Piven Strategy”
“The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and political activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven. The strategy aims to utilize “militant anti poverty groups” to facilitate a “political crisis” by overloading the welfare system via an increase in welfare claims, forcing the creation of a system of guaranteed minimum income and “redistributing income through the federal government”.[1][2][3]”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloward%E2%80%93Piven_strategy
But that sword cuts both ways as we saw with the rise of the unholy team of DINO Mayor Ed Koch and Republican President Ronald (ketchup is a vegetable) Reagan throughout the ’80s.
To avert bankruptcy, the city had to surrender control if its finances to a board compised of banks and a couple if state reoresentatives.
Running against many candidates, mild-mannered, even nebish, moderate liberal candidate had a makeover by David Garth and became a Jimmy Walker-like flamboyant mayor who could only dispense patronage through tax cuts and deregulation of fly-by-night speculator landlords using the buildings they intended to buy as colllateral for federal loans and the value of the buildings determined by the last sale price in a fast-moving shell game.
And many buildings, particularly in the South Bronx, mysteriously burned down. Crime and police brutality went hand in hand. Then we had the forced coop-conversion scams.
That is, the Republicans upstate. NYC Republicans have often been better than Dems. Bloomberg, Giuliani. Adams isn’t great on this issue but 4 term (12 years) Koch was the worst. I think Sliwa might be better. I recall a Republican candidate for NYC comptroller who wanted to raise the income limit for SCiE and DRIE and a candidate for another position who wanted to improve conditions in the projects.
At one point, Sliwa said he favored a rent freeze but I think he’s walked
that back.
I will vote for whoever seems to be able to defeat Mamdani in November. Unfortunately, there are 4 pro-Israel candidates. Nobody wants to withdraw.
Micah Lasher is another one. All the more outrageous because he just now won the primary by rallying the Jewish community behind him to defeat his pro-BDS Working Families Party-endorsed rival. Same party that endorsed Mamdani. It’s a betrayal right out of
the gate.
Puts pro-Israel rent stabilized tenants like myself in a difficult spot because the state assembly, state senate, and governor control New York City’s rent laws, and the Republicans would make us homeless if they could. I suppose I’ll just abstain from that race in November.
The idea that there would be a free market if rent stabilization were abolished was proven to be nonsense. Every administration has conspired
with landlords to warehouse empty apartments and buildings to keep supply low since the ’70s snd “affordable” means anything but in practice. It’s a rigged monopoly housing market same as our elections, most of the time.
Are the powers that be may be pulling for Mamdani because they hope he will ruin the economy and create a vacuum for the next administration to move in with a wrecking ball against existing safety net programs like before. A rent freeze or even rollback now and then is doable but the
rest of his proposals would bankrupt the city, which was the idea of this plan from the ’60s I’m trying to recall the name of. Bill Clinton invited one of them to his inauguration.
This happened before in the ’60s and ’70s. That’s how NYC lost it’s independence.
https://www.jta.org/2025/07/03/united-states/a-manhattan-pols-endorsement-of-zohran-mamdani-sparks-a-facebook-fracas
As a Jew, I’m totally disgusted with this man! He is an enemy of all Jewish people, past present and future! Much like a Kapo whore!
Chuckie is th embodiment of sleaze politics.
The poster boy for 2 term limits and honorarium salaries of $1.
What of the poor you say, they can’t afford to run – well.. think..do you want the poor, who have proven they cannot self manage, running the place???