Security Breach In AZ Hidden From The Public

5 Comments / 5 Comments

1. BREAKING: China Threatened Journalists In North Atlanta Investigating CCP Infiltration In High-Tech Area During 2016 Election
   by CD Media StaffJuly 8, 20210512
   Share2
   BREAKING: China Threatened Journalists In North Atlanta Investigating CCP Infiltration In High-Tech Area During 2016 Election

   Please Follow us on Gab, Minds, Telegram, Rumble, Gab TV, GETTR

   The bedroom community of Johns Creek in North Atlanta is one of the South’s high-tech arenas. It is also infested with Chinese Communist Party spies and operatives, as the CCP works to turn the great state of Georgia into a vassal state of Beijing.

   Judging from ‘Republican’ actions during the 2020 election cycle, they have made much progress in this quest. We have reported on Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger hailing from Johns Creek.

   After acquiring the Johns Creek Post earlier this year, CDMedia has had time to go through the information on the server, and wow, did we find some nuggets.

   The following is a threat posted in the comment section during the 2016 election, where certain candidates in North Georgia were running as ‘Republicans’.

   The JCP did a series on candidates running for city council in 2016 and two of the ‘Asian’ candidates didn’t return their answers by the deadline, so their answers were not published along with the other candidates.

   The response below was received on the Johns Creek Post comment section. St. Ives is a gated community in North Atlanta, known for athletes, recording artists, and now CCP infiltration.

   Below is the geolocation data of the IP address that posted the threat…essentially Tiananmen Square, China. The ISP is the same for the People’s Liberation Army.

   In short, the Chinese Communist Party was threatening journalists for exposing operations in Georgia as far back as 2016.

   http://creativedestructionmedia.com/investigations/2021/07/08/breaking-china-threatened-journalists-in-north-atlanta-investigating-ccp-infiltration-in-high-tech-area-during-2016-election/

   We have the proof.

   Log in to Reply

2. Well, this could change everything….The Legislative Branch is now going to have their own Federal Police Force dotted across the states…

   Nancy Pelosi Directs Capitol Hill Security Police Units to Regional Offices in California and Florida, Future Locations Coming
   July 6, 2021 | Sundance | 81 Comments

   In a remarkable display of how committed the Democrat party is to utilizing the narrative of domestic extremism for their own benefit, Nancy Pelosi is placing satellite field offices for the DC Capitol Police in key regions around the country. When we consider the FBI has field offices all over the country, you might ask: why does the Capitol Hill police need to expand beyond Washington DC?

   Essentially, what Nancy Pelosi is doing is expanding the federal law enforcement mechanism of the legislative branch into specific areas where they can investigate political opposition armed with legal authority.

   This is a concerning shift in events; however, there is a likelihood such a move is connected to the larger political goal of enhanced federal enforcement to quell any rebellion, while working in concert with the DOJ.

   …
   See this for what it is without getting too granular on the specifics. A federal political agency will now coordinate with federal U.S. Attorney’s on specific targeting operations. In essence, the Florida and California offices of Pelosi’s police will direct the DOJ on who and where to target. This is completely political.

   There’s no legislative or constitutional process of a subsidiary law enforcement agency to exist. This is a new construction outside the boundaries of the legislative branch and quasi-constitutional from the framework of the executive branch. Essentially satellite DC police units.

   State Governors need to respond to this action with direct and specific inquiries into what authorities “guide” these offices? What federal legislative authority creates them? The New York Police Department cannot set up a field office in Atlanta, Georgia, or Dallas, Texas; there is no jurisdictional authority that would permit it. So how can the DC police department operate field offices in states outside Washington DC jurisdiction?

   What this appears to be is a quasi-legal investigative agency run out of DC. I would be very curious to see the legal authority they would cite to support the operation(s).

   .

   As we have mentioned previously, the United States Department of Justice is prepared to use federal law enforcement (FBI) to secure their position. The purpose of their recent announcements should be clear to everyone. We discussed and outlined the background previously. {Go Deep 1} and {Go Deep Two}

   [Emphasis above, mine.] See this for what it is without getting too granular on the specifics. A federal political agency will now coordinate with federal U.S. Attorney’s on specific targeting operations. In essence, the Florida and California offices of Pelosi’s police will direct the DOJ on who and where to target. This is completely political.

   There’s no legislative or constitutional process of a subsidiary law enforcement agency to exist. This is a new construction outside the boundaries of the legislative branch and quasi-constitutional from the framework of the executive branch. Essentially satellite DC police units.

   State Governors need to respond to this action with direct and specific inquiries into what authorities “guide” these offices? What federal legislative authority creates them? The New York Police Department cannot set up a field office in Atlanta, Georgia, or Dallas, Texas; there is no jurisdictional authority that would permit it. So how can the DC police department operate field offices in states outside Washington DC jurisdiction?

   What this appears to be is a quasi-legal investigative agency run out of DC. I would be very curious to see the legal authority they would cite to support the operation(s).
   …

   Read the rest of the article here:
   https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/07/06/nancy-pelosi-directs-capitol-hill-security-police-units-to-regional-offices-in-california-and-florida-future-locations-coming/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=nancy-pelosi-directs-capitol-hill-security-police-units-to-regional-offices-in-california-and-florida-future-locations-coming

   Log in to Reply

3. @stevenl

   Far more fraud than mistakes!

   The legal standard defining the distinction between a fraudulent act and a mistake is proof of intent. Of course, to be able to prove intent in court can be a tricky thing, depending on circumstances surrounding a given error. Yet, in spite of this fact, the election is covered over in obvious evidence of fraud, from identical statistical mathematical models employed in counties across every county checked, to willfully ignoring unfolded mail-in ballots, to after hours counting ballots multiple times to 100% military ballots voting for Biden alone.

   The red flags are flying in every direction, even in a state like NH which is not among those 6 states in contention. The variances are statistically impossible to have happened by chance as Dr. Shiva and others have shown and defy the bellwether data going back to 1896 as shown by Seth Ketchel. There is not an election that has been looked into that has resulted in unremarkable findings. Meanwhile millions of dollars in legal fees are being spent on trying to not look at any part of the massive election victory from last year when another election season is beginning.

   So, yes, no mistakes matter where fraud is as plentiful and apparent as it seems to be across the entire country, and no one seems to be blind to these facts except for those who are unwilling to look at it honestly.

   Log in to Reply

4. Far more fraud than mistakes!

   Log in to Reply

5. Arizona Senator Wendy Rogers Calls for Audit of All Counties that Used Machines — And Not Just in Swing States — An Omen of Things to Come? Republican Senator Wendy Rogers called for audits on all counties that used voting machines in the 2020 election. And Senator Rogers was not just talking about Arizona and other swing states. She says all red states that used machines need to be audited! This may be an omen for what is coming out in August on the Maricopa County forensic audit. But so far the Arizona Senate is being tight-lipped on the results. Regardless, Senator Rogers is right. There have been so many mistakes reported by these voting machines that the results all need to be audited. From thegatewaypundit.com/2021/07/gop-arizona-senator-calls-audit-counties-used-machines-not-just-swing-states-omen-things-come/

   Log in to Reply