@Toni
I totally agree. Fact witnesses must have credibility to have their word accepted as factual support of any indictment of what they claimed to witness, and this craven creature has long since expunged any credibility to support her witness testimony on any topic, even if it is fairly stated. If it is fairly stated, a better source would benefit the subject matter and make the entire situation more pleasant, if for no other reason than that we should not need to lend her an air of authority and impartiality for which she has long since proven that she has no right to hold and which might later be used to advantage her political objectives which she too often substitutes as the place of objective reporting.
This is very different from the testimony given by the antisemitic Max Blumenthal in his recent expose on the interactions between Nazi elements in Ukraine and Zelensky(https://www.israpundit.org/how-ukraines-jewish-president-volodymyr-zelensky-made-peace-with-neo-nazi-paramilitaries-on-front-lines-of-war-with-russia/), where the article was relating sources that did not originate with Max himself. I would refuse to value anything which Max might regurgitate in the role of a fact witness in this article as I would with Eva in the above report. Yet, this is not the role Max played in Max’s recent article on Zelensky and the Nazi’s. In this article, he is not reporting that he personally witnessed the drama at Zolote where Zelensky was challenged by his army units after demanding their withdrawal, nor is he testifying that he witnessed the gathering between Zelnensky and “the National Corps, Azov, and everyone else”[very interesting phrasing by Zelensky for anyone who understands the actual connection between National Corp and Azov] where Zelensky tried to remedy the damage between himself and the army following his call for withdrawal.
Max’s reporting is as disturbing as it is verifiable, but this is true without Max or Eva being the fact witnesses involved in relating the subject.
So, for what it is worth, there is a role for unreformed antisemites to play in the reporting on the trouble and tragedy in Ukraine and elsewhere, but it should not be as a fact witness, not in my opinion in any case.
Why would anybody believe anything that woman says? She had lied about Gaza and about Israel and now she is to be believed? She claimed in an interview that Israeli soldiers used boulders to break arms and legs of Palestinians to terrorize them.
@Toni
I totally agree. Fact witnesses must have credibility to have their word accepted as factual support of any indictment of what they claimed to witness, and this craven creature has long since expunged any credibility to support her witness testimony on any topic, even if it is fairly stated. If it is fairly stated, a better source would benefit the subject matter and make the entire situation more pleasant, if for no other reason than that we should not need to lend her an air of authority and impartiality for which she has long since proven that she has no right to hold and which might later be used to advantage her political objectives which she too often substitutes as the place of objective reporting.
This is very different from the testimony given by the antisemitic Max Blumenthal in his recent expose on the interactions between Nazi elements in Ukraine and Zelensky(https://www.israpundit.org/how-ukraines-jewish-president-volodymyr-zelensky-made-peace-with-neo-nazi-paramilitaries-on-front-lines-of-war-with-russia/), where the article was relating sources that did not originate with Max himself. I would refuse to value anything which Max might regurgitate in the role of a fact witness in this article as I would with Eva in the above report. Yet, this is not the role Max played in Max’s recent article on Zelensky and the Nazi’s. In this article, he is not reporting that he personally witnessed the drama at Zolote where Zelensky was challenged by his army units after demanding their withdrawal, nor is he testifying that he witnessed the gathering between Zelnensky and “the National Corps, Azov, and everyone else”[very interesting phrasing by Zelensky for anyone who understands the actual connection between National Corp and Azov] where Zelensky tried to remedy the damage between himself and the army following his call for withdrawal.
Max’s reporting is as disturbing as it is verifiable, but this is true without Max or Eva being the fact witnesses involved in relating the subject.
So, for what it is worth, there is a role for unreformed antisemites to play in the reporting on the trouble and tragedy in Ukraine and elsewhere, but it should not be as a fact witness, not in my opinion in any case.
Why would anybody believe anything that woman says? She had lied about Gaza and about Israel and now she is to be believed? She claimed in an interview that Israeli soldiers used boulders to break arms and legs of Palestinians to terrorize them.
Sorry, not buying anything from that proven lier.