The REPO Act is The Greatest Theft in History

By Jim Rickards, WAR ROOM

Democratic members of Congress waive Ukrainian flags on the floor of the House of Representatives on April 20, 2024, after passing several foreign military assistance bills including the REPO Act

If you caught my appearance on the Bannon WarRoom podcast this past Wednesday, you heard me give details on how the REPO Act was written to essentially tie Donald Trump’s hands during his second term as president. But there is much more to tell than what I revealed on air. Here’s the rest of the story.

To review, the U.S. and its allies in Europe are moving quickly to steal U.S. Treasury securities lawfully owned by the Russian Federation. The consequences of this theft in the international monetary system would be momentous and highly adverse for the United States. Let’s look at the background to this situation before weighing the future damage.

The Greatest Theft in History

The Russian Federation is like any other country that runs a trade surplus – it must decide how to invest that surplus. Russia’s surplus, which is denominated heavily in U.S. dollars, is earned mostly through energy exports (oil, natural gas, and refined products) and also through weapons sales, nuclear reactor sales, mining output, tourism, and agricultural output.

The Russian surplus has been building for the last ten years, following the crash of oil prices in 2014. Russian reserves fell from about $475 billion to $355 billion during the oil price crash. Since then, the price of oil has rebounded and so have Russian energy sales abroad.

By 2022, just before the outbreak of the War in Ukraine, the Russian reserve position had climbed to about $630 billion. About 21% of that (or $130 billion) was invested in gold bullion in physical form stored in Russia. Of the remaining $500 billion, about $300 billion was invested in U.S. Treasury securities of various maturities.

The U.S. Treasury securities owned by Russia are all in digital book entry form on a ledger controlled by the U.S. Treasury. Title to the securities is recorded on the books of U.S. and European banks and on the books of Euroclear, the largest securities custodian and transfer agent in Europe and one of the largest in the world.

Of the $300 billion in Treasury securities, about $200 billion is held in Euroclear, another $90 billion is held by large European banks such as Deutsche Bank and Barclays, and $10 billion is held by large U.S. banks such as Citi and JPMorgan.

The principal amount of U.S. Treasuries owned by Russia also earns interest. Since the start of the war in Ukraine, these $300 billion of Russian-owned securities have earned approximately $6 billion in interest. Efforts by the United States to steal the Russian assets include the interest as well as the principal.

Other Russian assets in the U.S. such as direct foreign investment in companies or real estate are also being targeted. If the U.S. and its NATO allies work together to steal 100% of the Russian assets located in the West, it will be the greatest theft in the history of the world.

Immediately after the outbreak of the war in Ukraine in late February 2022, the U.S. froze all the Russian-owned U.S. Treasury securities. Freezing assets is not the same as stealing them. When assets are frozen, it means the owner cannot sell or transfer them, pledge them as collateral or collect interest income (or dividends in the case of shares). The title still belongs to the Russian Federation, but the securities are not available for any purpose until the freeze is lifted.

The U.S. has done this many times to political enemies such as Iran, North Korea, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba, and others. Often, the freeze is lifted years after it is imposed as political differences are ironed out and relations thaw. The U.S. has released tens of billions of dollars of frozen assets to Iran during the Obama and Biden administrations.

Although the Russia asset freeze was not as extreme as stealing the assets, it did mark a major escalation in prior practice. Russia is the eleventh-largest economy in the world, the largest nuclear power, the second-largest energy producer, has the ninth-largest population, has the largest land mass by far, and is a member of the G20.

The Russian-owned U.S. Treasuries were mostly controlled by the Central Bank of Russia. The move to freeze assets held by the central bank of such a large and powerful country was the most extreme move of its kind since the U.S. froze Japanese assets in August 1941. A few months later, the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor.

As extreme as the move to freeze Russian assets was, the current effort to steal the Russian assets is even more extreme and potentially dangerous to U.S. standing in the world of international finance.

The REPO Act is “Trump Proof”

In late April 2024, the U.S. Congress passed, and President Biden signed into law something called the “Rebuilding Economic Prosperity and Opportunity for Ukrainians Act” or the “REPO for Ukrainians Act” for short. The REPO Act authorizes the confiscation of certain Russian assets subject to U.S. jurisdiction including U.S. Treasury securities and the use of those assets to support Ukraine in its war against Russia. While the term “confiscation” is used in the legislation itself, this is outright theft of the assets.

The REPO Act says, “The President may confiscate any Russian sovereign assets subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.” Such assets confiscated are to be deposited in a “Ukraine Support Fund” to be managed by the State Department and the Agency for International Development (AID).

AID is well-known as a front for CIA financial activity overseas. The current head of AID is Samantha Power, who was formerly U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations under Barack Obama. This will give the Obama-Biden team and the CIA in particular effective control of the funds.

Democratic members of Congress waive Ukrainian flags on the floor of the House of Representatives on April 20, 2024, after passing several foreign military assistance bills including the REPO Act. Conservative Republicans criticized the Democrats for waiving foreign flags in the U.S. House. The supporters of the aid and the REPO Act show little understanding of the war dynamics in Ukraine and the fact that the massive expenditures they approved will make no difference.

The REPO Act also has provisions intended to tie Trump’s hands if he wins the election in November. Section 103 provides that “No Russian asset that is blocked … may be released or mobilized until the President certifies … that hostilities between the Russian Federation and Ukraine have ceased; and full compensation has been made to Ukraine.” Since those conditions are unlikely to be met in any scenario, this means that Trump cannot release the stolen assets since he cannot offer the certification.

Section 104 provides, “The authority to confiscate … Russian sovereign assets … shall terminate on the earlier of the date that is 5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.” That date is April 2029, which is after the end of Trump’s term if he wins the election. That means Trump cannot end the confiscation authority during his entire term of office. In effect, the Democrats and RINOs have made the REPO Act Trump proof.

The impact of the REPO Act is limited by the fact that only about $10 billion of Russian sovereign assets are actually under U.S. jurisdiction. Yet, the act contemplates this theft will be a down payment on a much larger theft to be conducted by NATO allies in Europe.

The REPO Act says, “The President shall take such action…necessary to seek to establish a common international compensation mechanism, in coordination with foreign partners … that shall include the establishment of an international fund to be known as the “Common Ukraine Fund”.”

This is a clear reference to the $290 billion of Russian sovereign assets held in Europe. The act then says that the assets of the Ukraine Support Fund will be contributed to the Common Ukraine Fund. No doubt, the U.S. will be the most powerful voice in the administration of the $290 billion common fund.

The Euroclear Connection

The U.S. goal is to use the G7 summit in Apulia, Italy on June 13-15, 2024, as a platform for getting the other G7 members to go along with the Common Ukraine Fund and to steal the Russian assets under their jurisdiction. The largest prize is the $200 billion in custody at Euroclear, which is based in Belgium.

Euroclear is owned by 78 major financial institutions, mostly in Europe. While Belgium is not a member of the G7 (U.S., Canada, UK, France, Italy, Germany, Japan and a representative of the EU), there is little doubt that the G7 countries operating through the banks they regulate, and other political and legal channels could force the confiscation of Russian assets held in Euroclear.

There are many variations on this plan of theft that are being considered. One plan would steal the interest only (about $6 billion) and leave the principal frozen but not confiscated. Another plan would organize a loan to Ukraine collateralized by the Russian assets. When Ukraine defaults on the loan, which they will certainly do, the lenders could seize the collateral. Another hare-brained scheme would impose a 100% tax on the assets and then collect the tax by seizing the assets. All of these variations amount to the same theft. They are wolves in sheep’s clothing.

The Consequences Will Be Devastating to the West

The consequences of this theft of Russian assets are far reaching and extremely negative for Western financial interests and the stability of the international monetary system.

One immediate impact would be the decline of trust in the U.S. Treasury market and an aversion to holding U.S. Treasury securities in sovereign reserves. Major holders of U.S. Treasuries such as China, Japan, Taiwan, Saudi Arabia, Brazil and others would gradually reallocate reserves away from Treasuries toward assets that cannot be frozen or seized such as gold bullion. This is happening already and is part of the explanation for the 30% increase in the dollar price of gold in the past few months.

This theft of Russian assets will also give a boost to efforts by the BRICS+ members to create an alternative gold-linked trade currency (and ultimately reserve currency) for use in international transactions. This effort will take several more years to complete, but U.S. abandonment of the rule of law will accelerate that effort.

If Europe joins the U.S. in stealing Russian assets, Russia will retaliate by seizing billions of dollars of direct foreign investment in Russia owned by major European companies such as Siemens, Total, BP, and others. The value of the European assets subject to seizure by Russia is greater than the value of the U.S. Treasuries owned by Russia. It could be the case that Russia makes a net profit from the two-way confiscation.

If Euroclear participates in this theft, Russia could sue Euroclear in a number of jurisdictions around the world. Euroclear is one of the largest custodians and clearing firms in the world with over $40 trillion in assets held, and has operations in Singapore, Hong Kong, and Malaysia as well as representative offices in Dubai, and Beijing. Courts in those jurisdictions are likely to be far more sympathetic to Russian complaints than European or U.S. courts. Russia could obtain judgments and put liens on Euroclear assets that could throw the global financial system into complete chaos.

The impact of the REPO Act is now being felt by U.S. banks as well. Just days afterWashington voted to authorize the REPO Act, a Russian court has ordered the seizure of $440 million from JPMorgan.

The assets had been frozen by authorities in the wake of the western sanctions, and highlights some of the fallout western companies are feeling from the punitive measures against Moscow. We will closely monitor this situation and update you with the latest as this plays out.

In an ironic twist, the mere talk about stealing Russian assets has caused the price of gold to increase by $600 per ounce in a matter of months. Russia has approximately 3,000 metric tonnes of gold in its reserves, which cannot be touched by Western sanctions or the REPO Act. The rally in gold prices has increased Russia’s reserve position by $50 billion without Russia lifting a finger. This is further evidence, as if any were needed, of Russian brilliance and U.S. stupidity in playing the global financial game.

April 27, 2024 | 14 Comments »

Subscribe to Israpundit Daily Digest

Leave a Reply

14 Comments / 14 Comments

  1. @Sebastian and Peloni: Thanks for your response. I checked and found that she was born in Oakland, California, so I wonder if it is my memory failing me or if the contradicting websites have been scrubbed. I remember her place of birth as Jamaica.

  2. @Sebastien
    @dreuveni
    An Anchor Baby president. Just what America needs in its decline. Let’s hope this never comes to be.

  3. Oh, well.

    Vice President Kamala Harris is eligible to be the president of the United States because she was born in the U.S., automatically making her a citizen, leading constitutional scholars say, contradicting online posts that revive an old and discredited narrative saying she is ineligible because her parents were “foreign nationals.”
    Harris is a “natural born citizen” of the U.S. as defined by the Constitution and her parents’ citizenship status at the time of her birth does not affect her eligibility for the presidency.

    https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/kamala-harris-eligible-be-president-despite-misleading-posts-2023-10-18/

  4. @dreuveni I googled the question: Does a vice-president have to be U.S. born” and this what came up. Good catch. Wow!

    “To become the President or Vice President of the United States, a person must be a natural born citizen. This “Natural Born Citizen Clause” is located in Section 1 of Article 2 of the United States Constitution.”
    https://www.law.cornell.edu › wex
    natural born citizen | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

  5. @Bear

    Now the monetary system between Russia and the West is collapsing.

    As Russia has enormous material resources, this should not be celebrated by the West, even as it foolishly is. The way to control Russia would have been to bring it into the West, and make it more dependent upon the West, rather than more independent of the West. Of course, China Joe chose a path which has led to the empowerment of China and weakening of the US. The idiocy and obsession which has driven the US to pull out all restraints in this diabolical international piracy of Russian state assets will only prove to be a pivotally unfortunate owned error by the US, and the simple truth is that this is not a genie which is likely to be easily returned to the bottle even with wiser US leadership. What is more is that this has created an enormous hole in any future economic war which the US might choose to leverage against any nation in the future. So while some in the US may celebrate this debacle as a welcomed event, the enemies of the US have cinched a work around for the reckless economic assaults which the US will find are now only most effective against its allies, such as Israel.

  6. @Adam

    the extermination of its population.

    There is no extermination or genocide going on in Ukraine. War has costs, which is why it is best to try to negotiate settlements in good faith to avoid them. Ukraine chose to do the opposite in collusion with their NATO masters, and of course choices have consequences, and Russia and Ukraine are both facing these consequences, albeit in similar and differing ways.

    what did America do with Japanese assets in American banks?

    In Dec. 1941, America was attacked while pursuing good faith negotiations with the Japanese, so the comparison to that historical reference has absolutely no relevance here since Russia has not attacked America and the Americans were supporting the bad faith negotiations of the Ukrainians.

    Agressors don’t have a right to assets that might use to further their agression.

    Is that true of American aggression as well? Since the US was a principle party to the slaughter of thousands of Libyans, and since it was THE principle party involved in the slaughter of the Serbs, should the US gold reserves around the world have been seized by all freedom loving nations? In fact, the leader of the Free World has been party to the overthrow of many democratic nations around the world in pursuit of its dominance around the world, and even today they are doing so in Israel. Indeed, there is no liberty collateral in American foreign policy, just national interests. Which is why they stole the Russian gold, so they could force the Russian people into a state of penury and revolt. Of course, that was the purpose of the economic war raised against Russia, but the result was to make Russia quite independent of the US and much more dependent upon China and Iran – something which we should agree is not even slightly an American interest.

  7. remember when you first heard about deaths from Covid? A few people dying in a far off place. And then … And then …

    So 44 people were “buried in one cemetery in Bamako on Friday 5 April after the weekly service,” a far off place.

    Not due to Covid, but due to extreme heat. And then … And then …

    Except extreme heat is not Covid – it cannot be stopped, and it will soon cover half the world, and it will continue for 100 000 or more years. This is the reality of allowing governments to put more carbon into the atmosphere.

    https://theguardian.com/environment/2023/sep/08/deadly-humid-heatwaves-to-spread-rapidly-as-climate-warms-study#:~:text=Life%2Dthreatening%20periods%20of%20high,resulting%20from%20the%20climate%20crisis.

    https://phys.org/news/2023-09-humanity-deep-danger-zone-planetary.html

    “On climate, we’re still following a pathway that takes us unequivocally to disaster,” said
    @jrockstrom
    . “We’re headed for 2.5C, 2.6C or 2.7C—a place we haven’t seen for the past four million years.”

    “There’s no evidence whatsoever that humans can survive in that environment,” he added.

    https://worldweatherattribution.org/extreme-sahel

  8. Adam

    There’s a teeny weeny problem.

    The Ukrainian government not Putin had a very strong urge to kill Ukrainian population

    I am talking about Ukrainian people who spoke russian

    Can you explain that please.

  9. @Adam you are on the mark!

    So Russia started the trouble by stealing land and murdering and kidnapping people in the Ukraine.

    Now the monetary system between Russia and the West is collapsing.

  10. The article shows that the only thoughts invested in this REPO Act were to tie Trump’s hands if he wins the election. There is a downside to these thoughts: If the O’Biden administration continues down this path, the Russians may actually deliver a cause to delay the elections for a while leaving the current administration holding the bag. While no-one will like that and a war anywhere with the US involved is not to be taken lightly in view of the depleted stocks of weapons and munitions, the Russians are likely to come out on top once again.

    I wonder how this act could be repealed by the current administration…

    By the way, what will happen if the Democrats manage to cheat their way to a second Biden term? Going beyond that for a moment, since Kamala Harris is not US-born, can she even become president of the USA?

  11. If you look at the record of the Biden junta and the utter ideological morons infesting American toxic “Democrat” and RINO Left, they couldn’t care less about Ukraine, Russia, Iran, Israel or anyone else, it’s ALL and I mean ALL, about Trump. Hang the economic fallout, the inflation, the privations on ordinary citizens, the devastating effects on the US economy, the damage to America’s standing, it’s ALL about Trump. It’s now been over EIGHT YEARS of witch-hunts, accusations, falsified accusations, concocted “crimes”, vast sums of money and wasted time to “get Trump” while the world careens towards another war that Biden and others will blame on Israel. But the “get Trump” bandwagon rolls on to “get” the only president in recent times to grow the economy and to NOT start a war, while keeping a lid on Iran and NK. My reading of this is that had Trump got his second term, Putin wouldn’t have invaded and Iran wouldn’t be about to get a nuclear weapon. Indeed, it was more important to corrupt schools and society with the Cult of Trans than ensuring the US encouraged World stability and peace. I’d like to be wrong, but I’m not. We are in for very dangerous times and even if Trump wins, the cancer has spread too far. I fear for the future. The cult of “get Trump” will do for us all.

  12. Adam

    The first problem I have with your comment

    “banks?What did all the Allies do with German assets that were in Allied territory?”

    The Russian and Yugoslavia people opposed Haj Amin el Husseini being freed to Egypt in 1945

    They understood his role in the Holocaust

  13. I’m sickand tired of the peoop0loe who keep rationalizing and justifying Russia’s agression against Ukraine and the extermination of its population. They do not pass the simple legal test of knowing right from wrong. They wsuffer from moral insanity As for “stealing” Russia’s money to provided desperately need humanitarian aid to the millions of Ukrainian (including hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian Jews,remember), what did America do with Japanese assets in American banks?What did all the Allies do with German assets that were in Allied territory? Agressors don’t have a right to assets that might use to further their agression.