Within hours of learning that Bashar al-Assad launched another horrific chemical-weapons attack on his own people, President Trump tweeted there’d be a “big price to pay.” He should follow his instincts by holding Assad accountable, increasing his leverage over Vladimir Putin and breaking Iran’s strategic foothold in Syria.
The tragedy of Syria is largely rooted in two decisions made by Trump’s predecessor, Barack Obama. The first was a refusal to act on his own declared red line for military action in response to the use of chemical weapons, which invited Russia and Iran to dominate the region.
The second was Obama’s decision to waive US sanctions on the Central Bank of Iran, which gave the Islamic Republic hundreds of billions of dollars to bolster the Assad regime both financially and militarily.
Trump now has an opportunity to reverse both mistakes. First and foremost, he should respond militarily to Assad’s crimes.
Obama’s failure to establish a US military deterrent emboldened Iran, North Korea, Russia and China to challenge America at every turn. Trump can ill afford to make the same mistake, particularly at a time when many question his resolve.
Last April, Trump responded to Assad’s chemical-weapons use by launching 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles at a Syrian airbase used to stage an attack. Since then, Iran’s military presence in Syria has expanded. America needs more than a once-a-year cruise-missile strike to defend the full range of our national-security interests.
Trump should start with strikes against the Assad regime’s chemical-weapons delivery infrastructure. The president should also make clear he won’t withdraw from territories the US military and its allies liberated from ISIS in eastern Syria until all our national-security objectives are achieved.
These territories constitute 30 percent of Syria’s land mass and put America and our allies in control of 70-90 percent of its pre-war oil production. That’s the kind of leverage over Putin that Trump needs in order to negotiate an end-state in Syria that doesn’t include Assad, Iran or ISIS.
The president should then target the financial lifeblood of Iran’s strategic hold on Syria: the Central Bank of Iran. In January, Trump promised to stop waiving sanctions on the bank unless Europe helped him fix Obama’s nuclear deal. But the deal can never be truly fixed so long as Iran can use its central bank to spread evil outside its borders.
It’s time for Trump to signal his intention to allow the sanctions waiver to expire.
Rather than use the windfall of sanctions relief provided under the nuclear deal to stabilize its economy, Iran’s central bank doubled down on sponsoring terrorism. In addition to financing the regime’s illicit missile program, proxy war in Yemen and repression at home, the Central Bank of Iran underwrites Hezbollah and the Revolutionary Guard Corps in the war for Assad’s survival.
In effect, Assad’s use of chemical weapons is enabled if not directly subsidized by the bank.
If terrorism, missiles and domestic repression weren’t enough reasons for France, Germany and Britain to support the re-imposition of sanctions against the bank, perhaps the financing of crimes against humanity will be. When French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel visit the White House later this month to ask for exceptions to these sanctions, Trump should push back hard.
Making exceptions to our Iran sanctions isn’t like making exceptions to steel tariffs. Every waiver helps Iran build another missile to wipe Israel off the map. Every exception increases the budget for Iranian terrorism. Every carve-out brings us more Shia militias and the threat of an ISIS resurgence in Syria.
The pressure campaign Trump built against North Korea should be replicated against the Islamic Republic — and that means not giving out exceptions.
The timing is perfect for the re-imposition of sanctions on the bank. This weekend, Iran’s currency cratered to a new record low. Protests are continuing throughout the country. The signs of regime instability and vulnerability to outside pressure are growing. Now is the ideal time to hit Iran’s central bank and shake the regime to its core.
For Trump, Iran’s use of the nuclear deal to expand its sponsorship of terrorism, missile development and proliferation were already reason enough to bring back these sanctions. This weekend’s barbaric attack in Syria gives him one more.
Richard Goldberg is a senior advisor at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.
Mordechai Kedar, in Arutz 7 has debunked the idea that the terrorists themselves committed the gas slaughter in Douma…”because it’s completely opposed to Middle East Culture, to kill the people you want to save in this way”.
Well I’ve lost a certain respect for Kedar, because he made a boo-boo here. These are NOT people that Assad wants to save, he is fighting to capture the town, using total war tactics, and has amply shown that he doesn’t care about collateral damage.
Kedar admits that Hamas can take a population hostage and send out children into minefields to set them off….But says….”to take chemical weapons and kill hundreds of children from your own side is way beyond even the satanic practices of the middle East…” This, to me, is the most foolish thing I’ve heard from Kedar in many years reading his articles. How more satanic, for instance, is it than setting out little children to set off mines, that will either kill them of maim them severely for life….without legs for instance, maybe arms too. perhaps brain damaged, maybe all three……
He redeems himself slightly later in the article by saying he believes that Iran was testing out a new weapon before the area fell, because it was expected that there would be resistance only for another 2 weeks. The part-redemption was that he then continued that “it is my own wild conjecture..”.
. We can only wait and see…… .But from now on, I’ll be more careful as to how I absorb Mordechai’s articles.