Without proof, Tucker Carlson accuses Israel of ‘committing crimes’ in America, claims Jeffrey Epstein was Israeli agent

Carlson has shared increasingly anti-Israel views since start of the Oct 7 war

Tucker Carlson (Photo: Screenshot)

Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson told an audience last Friday at the Turning Points meeting in Florida that Jeffrey Epstein was most likely an Israeli Mossad agent.

“The real question is not ‘Was Jeffrey Epstein a weirdo who was abusing girls?’ Carlson stated. “The real question is, why was he doing this, on whose behalf, and where did the money come from?”

“I think the real answer is Jeffrey Epstein was working on behalf of intel services, probably not American,” he stated. “And we have every right to ask, on whose behalf was he working?”

Carlson then went on to point a finger at Israel, as he has done quite frequently since the start of the Oct. 7, 2023, war, and the launch of his own media program, “The Tucker Carlson Show.”

“Now, no one’s allowed to say that the foreign government is Israel because we have been somehow cowed into thinking that’s naughty,” Carlson opined to loud cheers and clapping from the Turning Point audience.

“There is nothing wrong with saying that. There is nothing hateful about saying that, Carlson stated. He went on to say, “There’s nothing even anti-Israel about saying that.”

“And you have the right to expect your government will not act against your interests, and you have a right to demand that foreign governments not be allowed to act against your interests.”

Carlson also claimed that the Israeli government was directly asked whether Epstein had been working as a Mossad agent while committing crimes on U.S. soil – and refused to answer.

“Of course, that question has been asked to the government of Israel, and their answer is, ‘We’re not going to tell you,’” Carlson claimed. He went on to say that U.S. financial support for Israel gives people the right to demand an answer.

“As long as we’re sending you money, if you were committing crimes on our soil, we have an absolute right to know – did you do this or not?”

Carlson even claimed that “every single person in Washington D.C.” shares his opinion that Epstein was a Mossad agent, stating that none of them “hate Israel.”

In a recent episode of his show, Carlson spoke with “Breaking Points” host Saagar Enjeti about the abrupt reversal by Trump administration officials, including Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel.

The two officials claimed earlier this year to have “thousands” of documents in their possession related to the Epstein case. Patel even promised that there would be “no cover-ups, no missing documents, and no stone left unturned.”

Attorney General Bondi appeared to confirm the existence of the “Epstein client list” during a February interview with Fox News’ John Roberts, who asked her about the list.

She responded, “It’s sitting on my desk right now to review. That’s been a directive by President Trump. I’m reviewing that.”

In the episode last Tuesday, Carlson said he believes that Epstein’s crimes and those of his associates are being covered up to protect U.S. and Israeli intelligence agencies.

“The only other explanation that I can think of, again, maybe you’ve got another, is that intel services are at the very center of this story, U.S. and Israeli, and they’re being protected,” he said. “I think that seems like the most obvious.”

Enjeti appeared to agree with Carlson, referring to a 2021 article on BuzzFeed about sex crimes committed by CIA staffers.

“There have been multiple documented cases of pedophilia inside of the CIA perpetrated by CIA officers,” Enjeti said. “There was a BuzzFeed News piece years back where the CIA specifically did not want to prosecute those individuals in federal court for fear that they would reveal sources and methods if they were pulled into open court, and they basically just made it go away.”

In his Turning Point speech, Carlson also stated, “No one has ever gotten to the bottom of that [Epstein’s backing and funding] because no one has ever tried. And moreover, it’s extremely obvious to anyone who watches – that this guy had direct connections to a foreign government,” he claimed.

While Carlson did not provide evidence for his claims – either on last Tuesday’s edition of his show or during his Turning Point speech – it appears he is drawing, at least in part, from the work of journalist Whitney Webb, who published a series of articles about the Epstein scandal on the website “Unlimited Hangout.” These later became the basis for a two-volume series published in 2022, called “One Nation Under Blackmail: The Sordid Union Between Intelligence and Crime that Gave Rise to Je?rey Epstein.”

While those sources reveal connections between Epstein, his associates, and several Israeli officials, they also reveal an extensive connection to U.S. intelligence services and crime organizations – all issues that Carlson ignores. He focused solely on Epstein’s connections to Israel.

Multiple accounts on social media responded to Carlson, asking for proof of his claims. Others, who appeared to be familiar with some of Webb’s research, questioned why Carlson only focused on Israel while ignoring the clear connections to political and government leaders in the United States.

Since the start of the Gaza War, Carlson has increasingly shared anti-Israel opinions and has hosted anti-Israel guests on his show, while deflecting questions about possible ties to Islamic businessmen.

July 14, 2025 | 8 Comments »

Leave a Reply

8 Comments / 8 Comments

  2. If Quarlsome is “America First” ,” I’m a tea pot.”

    AI Overview

    +1
    The line “I’m not a cab driver, I’m a teapot” is from the play Arsenic and Old Lace. It’s spoken by a cab driver after Mortimer Brewster, the main character, declares he’s not a Brewster, but the son of a sea cook, according to IMDb. The exchange is part of the play’s humorous and absurd tone, particularly in its final scene.

    Also a hilarious movie, starring Cary Grant, Raymond Massey, Peter Lorre (1944)

    1

  6. Tucker Carlson Shills for Qatar
    March 17, 2025
    by John D. Guandolo

    Tucker Carlson’s recent interview of the Qatari Prime Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani is rightfully drawing criticism. [See the full interview here.]

    The interview appears to be a puff peace to portray Qatar as a normalized nation integrated into the world community which simply wants to be left alone regarding its culture and way of doing things. I cannot recall an interview by Mr. Carlson so devoid of intellectual inquiry and background knowledge of a subject of an interview.

    Qatar is a member of the OIC (Organisation of Islamic Cooperation) which is the largest voting block in the UN made up of every Islamic nation on earth. In 1993, the OIC formally served the “Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam” to the United Nations in which the entire Islamic world declared their only understanding of “human rights” is through the lens of Islamic sharia or Islamic Law (Articles 24 & 25).

    [What Islam is All About is the most widely used textbook in U.S. Islamic schools to teach muslim 7th graders about Islam.]

    As a matter of fact, all published Islamic law mandates:

    1. All non-muslims convert to Islam or be killed with the exception of Jews, Christians or Zoroastrians who have the third option of submitting to sharia and paying the non-muslim poll tax (jizya).

    2. All muslims who leave Islam must be killed.

    3. All homosexuals must be killed.

    4. All those who commit adultery must be killed.

    5. All those who kill muslims without right under sharia – like American soldiers fighting Al Qaeda, the Islamic State, and others overseas – must be killed.

    6. 1/8 of all financial and material wealth of muslims be dedicated to jihad, identified in sharia as “Islamic military operations.”

    7. The purpose of Islam is to establish an Islamic State across the entire world under which sharia is the “law of the land.”

    8. Muslim to lie to non-muslims if it advances Islam.

    This is the background anybody speaking with or interviewing a sharia adherent muslim needs to have in order to have an honest discussion based in reality.

    At the very outset of the interview, Qatar’s prime minister makes it clear he is a sharia-adherent muslim and that Qatar’s “culture” will not be intimidated by the West. Al Thani’s response came from Tucker Carlson’s question, asked in the form of a commentary, about the criticism Qatar received during the world cup on enforcing sharia on non-muslims visiting Qatar for the World Cup.

    While Carlson nor Al Thani used the word “sharia” during their discussion, they did refer to behaviors forbidden in sharia. Tucker Carlson actually called the criticism of Qatar for this “cultural imperialism.”

    As a matter of fact Al Thani stated that everything Qatar does is to advance “peace” which Carlson gobbled up and continued with the interview.

    Had Mr. Carlson done his homework, he would know: (1) Qatar is a member of the OIC which has formally served a document to the UN stating Qatar only understands “human rights” as defined by Islamic sharia; and (2) in sharia “peace” is defined as the state that exists when there is an Islamic State across the entire world and sharia is imposed on everyone on earth.

    But apparently, Mr. Carlson does not know this.

    When he asked about the designated Foreign Terrorist Organization Hamas and its office in Qatar, Mr. Carlson never asked the PM what specific policy and principle differences does Qatar have with Hamas.

    Yet, as all jihadis do, Qatar’s Prime Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani threatened the United States with violence if the U.S. uses military force to thwart Iran’s nuclear weapons program. He spoke in a way which gives him an out to say he was referring to third parties who will attack U.S. assets in Qatar and the region if the U.S. acts against Iran, but anyone with an understanding of how Islamic leaders communicate know exactly what he was saying.

    No response from Tucker Carlson.

    Much of the last portion of the interview dealt with the sanctions on Iran. During this entire segment, Mr. Carlson used it to beat the U.S. up on how ineffective sanctions are, and why they ought not be a tool of the United States against Iran.

    Despite a person’s opinion of sanctions, it is worth listening to Qatar’s Prime Minister when he says, “We (Qatar) have a lot in common with Iran.”

    This is true. Qatar and Iran both work towards a global Caliphate under which “allah’s divine law”/sharia are imposed on every human on earth. Although one nation is sunni and the other shia, when it comes to the non-muslim world, they agree on how non-muslims should be treated.

    https://johnguandolo.com/f/tucker-carlson-shills-for-qatar

  7. Seems what you’re really saying is that Epstein was the person who had a predilection for young girls; the “elites” who benefited from this predilection had nothing to do with it; they were just “innocent victims” (including Prince Andrew).

  8. Just think, if these stories that Carlson has been spouting recently about Jeffery Epstein (what a nice English/Jewish name he has or had,) were true and someone from the CIA, the FBI, the Mossad or whoever were to come forward and provide names and provable activities, all the nuclear nations in the world could disband their weapons because they would no longer be needed. The explosion would rip the world apart.

    On the other hand, I didn’t hear him asking the CIA or the FBI if any of this were true. He probably wouldn’t survive.

    Whatever the case may be, and none of this is proven, there is a lot of smoke and flames about the rape and torture of young children by the so-called elites from all over the world and the blackmail and coercion directed against them. The elites are more concerned with their reputations than with the children – shame on them!

    So, once again, let’s consider that some of these stories may be true. It seems that a large number of members of congress and senate are shaking in the shoes about the idea that they may be exposed, however slightly, by their names being on the “List”.

    On the other hand, until about last week, there was no talk about Trump’s involvement in any of these stories. The clincher is, that the “intelligence” agencies have had all this information for years now and they would have used it to bring Trump down immediately if they could.

    My suggestion is to thumbs down Carlson and whoever pays him whenever you can, because irrelevant of the truth of any of this, he is trying to prolong the woke philosophy of the sore loser Dems. There is no profit to be gained in it.