Mark Levin: War with Iran Supports American Security, American Interests and America’s Geopolitical Standing

Peloni & David Fieldstone

The Mark Levin Show. Image by Mark Levin – , Public Domain, Wikipedia

Video Loads at Bottom

Mark Levin opens his Saturday March 7 Show: by providing a strong defense for the war being waged by Trump against Iran, arguing it is necessary to stop nuclear weapons, terrorism, and geopolitical adversaries * while criticizing domestic opposition to the conflict.

He begins with a live update of the ongoing U.S. partnered with Israel war against Iran – from Dubai – which describes significant military operations and their regional impacts. The report includes details of the U.S. and Israeli forces which conducted thousands of strikes against Iranian targets, including oil refineries, as well as military infrastructure, while Iran has launched missiles and drones at regional countries such as the UAE (more than what they sent to Israel). Segueing from this report, Levin strongly praises Donald Trump, highlighting the fact that he is a historic leader – whose commonsense decision to attack Iran was then necessary to stop the Iranian regime from very soon obtaining deliverable to even the homeland U.S. – nuclear weapons –  and expanding its military threats. He continues by reminding us that negotiations with Iran failed because Iranian officials refused to abandon uranium enrichment, which was the bare minimum of terms which were initially demanded of them.

Mark also describes the joint U.S.-Israeli campaign with Benjamin Netanyahu – as being an unprecedented military operation which has been seen to rapidly degrade Iran’s leadership, its missile capabilities, its air defenses, as well as its nuclear facilities. He explains further that the war should be characterized as a “peace mission,” the intent of which is to topple the Iranian regime, free Iran’s population, while also eliminating its nuclear threats. In addition to this – we are reminded of Iran’s decades-long-role: as a state sponsor of global terrorism, with also cooperates with US geopolitical rivals such as Xi Jinping’s China and Vladimir Putin’s Russia through oil trade, many infrastructure partnerships, and weapons transfers.  Hence, weakening Iranian arms – serves as an indirect manner by which to reduce threats to the United States and its allies from their geopolitical rivals world-wide.

Mark chastises the combined voices of Democrats and media commentators, who challenge the wisdom of entering this war, insisting that the President has constitutional authority to conduct military action, without a formal declaration of war. Mark concludes this segment by honoring the fallen U.S. soldiers who died in the conflict, while expressing support for the ongoing campaign to its inevitable end of seeing Iran defeated and its current leaders removed howsoever (many of them already dead from air-strikes fostered by “intelligence” superb).

In his second segment, Mark talks with Richard Goldberg, a senior adviser at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, about the ongoing U.S.–Israel war against Iran.  Goldberg argues that the military coordination between the United States and Israel has been unprecedented. He explains that the two countries are conducting highly integrated operations – including the sharing of intelligence, coordinating air missions in real time, and using U.S.-supplied aircraft. Goldberg highlights Israel’s intelligence capabilities and combat experience both of which he describes as making it a uniquely valuable U.S. ally in confronting Iran in the ongoing campaign. Goldberg joins Mark’s criticism for U.S. politicians who have suggested reducing support for Israel, explaining that doing so would actually weaken American national security, specifically because of the heavy reliance which the U.S. relies places on Israeli intelligence and operational capabilities.  Goldberg also shares his strong support for Trump’s decision to confront the Iranian militarily.  He explains – this has been a decisive act of leadership needed to address Iran as being a long-standing enemy of the United States – which supports terrorism, seeks nuclear weapons, and threatens regional stability as a missive imperative. Goldberg closes out – by reinforcing Mark’s previous comment about the campaign against Iran having the effect of rapidly degrading Iran’s military capabilities and leadership on all fronts, including its own run by terrorists.

In the third segment, Mark speaks with Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, founder of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy, who criticizes the 53 Democratic Congressmen who voted in opposition to the Resolution labeling Iran as the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism. Jasser addresses Iran’s Islamist regime’s “ideological” commitment to violence and global Jihad, and that U.S. military action was necessary to eliminate the regime and allow the Iranian people to regain control of their country.  He also describes the elements within the Democratic Party which are sympathetic to, or influenced by, Islamist political movements – while praising Pres. Trump for his decisive military action against Iran and its proxies, which was timely required.

In his final segment, Mark speaks with Peter Schweizer of the Government Accountability Institute, who highlights the fact that Trump’s actions against Iran—and his earlier actions against Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela—have been part of a broader strategic effort to weaken Xi Jinping’s China.  These operations damage China’s global influence – because Iran and Venezuela have been key Chinese partners in energy, trade, and overall geopolitical strategy. Schweizer challenges that weakening Iran thus reduces China’s access to oil, making it more difficult for China to challenge the United States, which would include any potential conflict over Taiwan.

In a closing statements, Mark criticizes the failures of past U.S. Presidents – including Jimmy Carter, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden – for policies which specifically strengthened Iran in its region and across the globe, noting that Trump has been the only president willing to decisively and militarily confront the Iranian regime – and prevent it from soon acquiring deliverable nuclear weapons as far as to the USA.