Burns: “2007 is the year of decision”.

US under secretary of state: We won’t allow nuclear Iran’

“Iran is seeking a nuclear weapon, there’s no doubt about it,” Burns said, adding: “There’s no debate among experts. It’s seeking a nuclear weapon at its plant at Nantz.”

The US under-secretary added that his country “is not seeking, at all, a confrontation with Iran,” but said that “the policy of the United States is that we cannot allow Iran to become a nuclear weapons state.” His declaration was met with applause among the delegates attending the conference.

He affirmed Washington’s close alliance with Jerusalem, saying:

    “We are committed to our alliance with Israel. We are committed to being Israel’s strongest security partner. I can’t remember a time when the relationship between our two countries was stronger than it is today.”

“The US has not gone out to look for an argument with Iran,” Burns emphasized, but Iran has refused to back down in its attempt to destabilize the region, prompting the US to station “two battle groups in the Persian gulf,” and to target Iranian networks enabling attacks on US soldiers in Iraq. “We have an absolute right to defend our soldiers,” he added.

Burns outlined a series of diplomatic steps taken by Washington against Iran, and urged the countries of the European Union to end their economic cooperation with the Islamic Republic.

2007 year of decision’

He also highlighted Iran’s divisive role in the Middle East, support of Palestinian terror groups, Hizbullah, and attempt to topple the government of Lebanese Prime Minister Fouad Siniora.

“In Lebanon, in a couple days time, President Chirac will host a conference, so that the democratic nations stand up in the world against Hizbullah, against those who want to destabilize the democratic government of Siniora,” Burns said, adding that the US will help this effort.

“We’re all going to defend a democratically elected government from that axis…and we’re going to help democracy survive and hopefully prosper,” he said. Burns expressed hope that Iran would return to the negotiating table, and said the offer for negotiations was still open.

Transportation Minister and former defense minister Shaul Mofaz, who had met with Burns before their joint appearance at the Herzliya conference, said the coming year would be a crucial time for deciding the future of the Middle East.

“The year of 2007 is a year of decisiveness,” Mofaz said. “Iran of 2007 has all the components to threaten us existentially, and the whole of the region.”

“Mahmoud Ahmadinejad believes he is on a divine mission. I’m the last person to call him insane,” Mofaz said. “Although I am not qualified as a psychologist, it’s clear to me we are dealing with a person driven by an extremist ideology, who is determined to fulfill his mission,” he added.

“Iran is the heart of the problem in the Middle East. It is the urgent threat to the world. And it must be dealt with, before it’s too late,” he said, adding: “The world can’t allow a situation in which a fundamentalist country – that doesn’t hide its intentions – holds nuclear weapons. The free world doesn’t have the privilege to drag its feet on Iran and hope for best.”

January 22, 2007 | 3 Comments »

Subscribe to Israpundit Daily Digest

3 Comments / 3 Comments

  1. Richard Perle was also at the conference Burns attended. Julie Stahl, Jerusalem Bureau Chief of CNSNews.com wrote an article covering some of Burns’ comments along with more comments made by Perle:

    Herzliya, Israel (CNSNews.com) – Will the United States attack Iran to prevent it from going nuclear? President Bush might order such an attack, depending on circumstances, a former U.S. government official said on Sunday.

    “I think that until the day he leaves office, this is a president that, if he is told, ‘Mr. President, you are at the point of no return,’ I have very little doubt that this president would order the necessary military action,” said Richard Perle, who worked for both the Reagan and Bush administrations.

    Perle, a neoconservative who pressed for the U.S. invasion of Iraq, was among the American and Israeli political and security experts attending Israel’s seventh annual Herzliya Conference over the weekend.

    The gathering focuses on Israel’s national security interests.

    Perle and other speakers noted that Iran is unlikely to comply with United Nations demands to stop enriching uranium, and that means the international community eventually will have to take strong action to stop Iran from producing a nuclear weapon.

    “The current [sanctions] policy…will not lead the Iranians to abandon their nuclear weapons program…If we continue what we are doing, Iran will become a nuclear weapons state,” Perle said.

    Deterrence is a psychological game, Perle said, and when it fails, it does so “catastrophically.”

    Perle warned against waiting too long to stop Iran. He mentioned that the U.S. watched al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden for years – but did nothing until bin Laden attacked the U.S. He said the U.S. doesn’t want to repeat such a mistake.

    Perle also noted that Israel, in bombing Iraq’s nuclear reactor in 1981, didn’t wait until Iraq was about to produce a nuclear weapon. Iraq was still several years away from that point.

    Perle advocates regime change in Iran. If the United States does not support the Iranian opposition, it will never come together, he warned………CNSNews

  2. I am well aware of the history of US pressure on Israel. Nevertheless I have maintained that the US needs Israel now to be strong so would not force Israel to retreat from Judea and Samaria. If the US really does act to stop Iran, it will want israel to act to stop Hexbollah and Hamas.

Comments are closed.