Bush preventing the IDF from routing Hamas

DEBKAfile Exclusive Report

Israeli Military up in Arms over Bush-Olmert Plan for Major Operation in Gaza on Behalf of… Palestinian Authority

February 16, 2008,

President George W. Bush gave Israel the nod for its long-delayed military operation against Hamas in the Gaza before he ended his 50-hour visit to Jerusalem and Ramallah on Friday, Jan. 11 – except that his provisos stop the Israeli military short of its objectives, namely stamping out the Palestinian missile campaign, halting smuggling and eradicating Hamas military stockpiles, as reported here by DEBKAfile’s military sources:

1. Israeli forces must limit their invasion to two or three strips abutting the Gaza-Israeli border of the 365 sq. km square Hamas-ruled territory on Israel’s southwestern border. Those sources identify those strips as the northern pocket of Beit Hanoun, Beit Lahiya and the fringes of the Jebalya camp; the southern areas east of Khan Younes up to the Sufa and Kerem Shalom crossings; and sections of the Philadelphi border strip with Egypt, up to and excluding the Mediterranean coast.

Operationally, this means the Israeli army may push back the Qassam missile launching sites from the border and distance this harassment from the Israeli population, but may not destroy terrorist arms and missile caches and their means of production.

Israel is also enabled to deal only partially with the smuggling system for the weapons, explosives, fighters and cash, which nourish the Gaza Strip’s Palestinian terrorist groups through Sinai.

2. The IDFIDF must operate only in sparsely-populated areas and desist from actions that may cause extensive Palestinian civilian casualties.

3. The IDFIDF will not capture the main cities, e.g. Gaza City, Rafah and Khan Younes.

4. After clearing captured areas of Hamas, Jihad Islami and other Palestinian terrorists, the Israeli army must pull out and hand the cleansed territory to the forces of the Palestinian Authority chairman Mahmoud Abbas.

Israel must enable the passage of those forces from the West Bank to the Gaza Strip and allow them to establish military bases for launching their offensives to recapture the entire Gaza Strip, thereby reversing Hamas’ success in forcing their retreat six months ago.

Point 4 was tagged onto the list during the US president’s talks with Abbas in Ramallah Thursday, Jan. 10.

The Palestinian leader proposed that Bush’s assent to an Israel counter-terror operation in the Gaza Strip be exploited for the IDF to prepare the ground for his Fatah-ruled Palestinian Authority to regain its control of the lost territory.

It was agreed between Bush, Abbas and Olmert, that the details of this plan be worked out after the US president returns home at the end of his Middle East tour.

The Bush-Olmert understanding entrusted defense minister Ehud Barak with leading and charting the Gaza operation, determining its timeline and being responsible to Washington for the IDF not stepping out of the above preset boundaries.

It will also be up to Barak to decide whether to pursue the objective in phased offensives.

DEBKAfile’s military sources report that the Olmert government’s acceptance of this plan has stirred outrage in the IDF high command, general staff, southern command and the security establishment.

For the first time in its 60 years of independence, Israel’s national army is being pressed into service to capture a territory on behalf of a foreign entity. They ask by what authority did the prime minister and defense minister sign off on a plan which is an immoral distortion of the IDF’s longstanding mission.

The notion that members of Israel’s people’s army, which is duty bound to defend the state, may be ordered to fight and lay down their lives in the service of the Palestinian Authority, presents every serviceman with an irreconcilable dilemma.

It might be easier if they were permitted to eradicate the Palestinian missile threat and war machine, stock, lock and barrel. But this is ruled out by Bush.

The IDF found it difficult enough to recover its equilibrium from the political task to forcibly evict Jewish communities from the Gaza Strip foisted on it by the Sharon-Olmert-Livni government in 2005. Today, Israeli policy-makers, the United States and the Palestinian Authority are contemplating saddling the soldiers with another political undertaking: to turn around the Fatah’s defeat in its internecine war with Hamas.

Israeli generals and security chiefs caution the government against accepting this perilous and self-destructive adventure and point to its glaring flaws.

Its very conception has distorted the peace process so that the burden of its success rests on the IDF’s shoulders. If a military campaign succeeds in gaining control of parts of Gaza on behalf of the Palestinian Authority, peace talks will resume with Abbas’ standing much enhanced. But if the results are mixed, like in the 2006 Lebanon War under Olmert’s direction, the Palestinian leader will drop Israel and the United States like hot coals, turn coat and seek an understanding with Hamas for a re-united front against Israel.

Already, since the plan was floated, Israel-Palestinian talks have petered out and become irrelevant, while negotiations for the release of the kidnapped Israeli soldier Gilead Shalit have been put on ice. Hamas will on no account discuss terms for his release with a large-scale Israeli offensive hanging over Gaza.

Another of the plan’s fundamental flaws is that the Palestinian Authority is in effect leaderless, rudderless and is bereft of the professional security strength for following up on the deal.

The Bush-Olmert-Abbas plan would have the Israeli military pull their irons out of the fire when it is common knowledge that once inside Gaza, PA security forces will quickly disintegrate and be swallowed up by the far more resolute Hamas. It was therefore proposed in Bush’s talks in Ramallah and Jerusalem that the Israeli Air Force and artillery provide support for the Palestinian takeover of the Gaza Strip, a tactic the US army employs for local forces in Iraq.

February 16, 2008 | 10 Comments »

Subscribe to Israpundit Daily Digest

Leave a Reply

10 Comments / 10 Comments

  1. I read a long time ago that the American Administration pulled the rug from under the Shah of Persia, whom they had raised to power, to put the Muslim fanatic Shiites in power. Following this, came the invasion in Iraq that was aimed to benefit the Shiites – Iranian and Iraqi.

    What most people don’t know is that there is a connection between the Freemason brotherhood and the Muslim brotherhood. You see it also in their shared main symbol, the phallic pillar; the obelisk in the Illuminized Freemasonry and the minaret in Islam. The top levels of the Masons are Arabic and they swear on the Koran.

    Find evidence of this also in Churchill’s dealings with the Hashemites, who are Masonic Lodge Masters – it cost the Jews their mandated land in Edom and Moab.

    One can also call it the “Babylonian Connection” – where this moon god of the phallic tower is rooted.

  2. Yes, I agree there is more damage to come, much more. It is a shame that people, especially ones who proclaim themselves to be leaders, are so prideful that they can’t admit they are wrong, especially seven years later! But it should have been evident right from the start, but people want to put their trust in man so bad that they are willing to overlook someone as evil as a man like Bush.

  3. Lee U I think one of the hardest things for for most peiple is to admit they were mistaken; in error, and just plain wrong. Bush was the hope for Many Americans, for a better America and a better world, Look at the damage that we can see and its bad but wait until we come face to face with the damage we will see in the near future that is still Hidden from our view

  4. I can’t understand why people – Christians especially – continue to defend this man, as if he were somehow righteous. Here is a man who took Iraq, which wasn’t a haven for terrorists, and made it a haven for terrorists. He is responsible for the murder of 100,000+ civilians in Iraq and other places. He has repeatedly proven to be an enemy of Israel, much like his father before him and his grandfather before him (who, we must remember, was the personal banker to the Third Reich). Bush has continually lied and broken US laws yet everybody is afraid of him; they must be because no one is taking action against him or his comrades.

    His demonic vision of a two-state solution is nothing more than the next chapter in the Final Solution. His secretive works are clearly of someone devoted to evil. He supports terrorism against Israel, even when US citizens are murdered. Time for people to speak up; don’t be afraid. He’s only a man, and not much of one at that.

  5. Why are the Israelis so befuddled? There is a whole befuddling industry there working on them. Israel is one huge psy-op for Jews.

  6. Bush may be an imbecile, an idiot whose hour upon the stage will soon be over. Bush has no concern who he takes down with him for he will be an unlamentable page in history, except he will continue to maintain protection of the self-appointed Kings and Princes of Saudi Arabia by United States military forces, a policy even to be continued by his soon to be successor, so let’s get over the wish to get out of the Middle East, for the time being. That’s not the problem.

    But what I’m troubled by this: I know what has to be done. You know what has to be done. Anyone with any modicum of intelligence knows what has to be done. Our continual baying at the moon by cogent writing and impeccable logic will not solve the dilemma preoccupying the minds of contributors. The question is what is it in the Israeli psyche that makes them face announcement of their annihilation supported by overt deadly physical attacks placidly go about awaiting their doom as sworn to by their enemies, who really mean what they say— Death to Israel! Why are the Israelis so befuddled? Why am I reminded of the German Holocaust?

  7. As any serving person anywhere in the world would say to Pres. Bush – Foxtrot Oscar – and i hope someone explains to him that a fellow called Oscar is not being told to dance!

  8. Bill: the ans. apparently is Israel with it’s current leadership/ Jews are a strange lot:

    If God lived on earth, people would break his windows

    Rejoice not at thine enemy’s fall – but don’t rush to pick him up either.

    Why do Jewish divorces cost so much? They’re worth it

    Why do Jewish men die before their wives? They want to.

    I find I can only laugh!!!

  9. And why is it precisely that Israel will not be allowed to destroy the weapons threatening it?

    It is insane beyond belief for Israeli boys to die for the purpose of setting up a terrorist state on its borders. If Olmert does not find this to be anathema to the existence of Israel, then he needs to leave Israel forever. He is a traitor of the most bizarre kind.

  10. Yamit writes

    For the Israeli Defense Forces, this proposal is totally unacceptable.

    For one thing, the Palestinian Authority’s security services are riddled with wanted terrorists.

    Furthermore, Abbas and his elite officials are not considered representative by the bulk of the Palestinian people (who in Jan. 2006 voted Hamas into office). Neither are they trusted to execute complicated strategies.

    Finally, the Bush-Olmert policy of placing all their bets for a Middle East breakthrough on the inept MahmoudMahmoud AbbasAbbas condemns their plan to failure.

    At the dinner Olmert hosted in honor of the US president Thursday night, several ministers pointed out these hard facts to Bush and told him bluntly that he is gambling all his hopes for peace on a non-existent entity called the Palestinian Authority.

    The US president answered: “I agree. That really is a problem.”