Climate Scientist Urges President Trump not to Cave to Ivanka’s ‘Climate Change Madness’

By Thomas G Williams PhD., BREITBART

In an open letter to Donald Trump, climate expert Dr. Duane Thresher has urged the President not to give in to his daughter Ivanka’s misguided views on global warming and her insistence that the U.S. remain in the Paris climate agreement ratified by Barack Obama last August.

“Climate treaties like the Paris Agreement have little to do with climate,” Thresher notes in his letter, which he made available to Breitbart News. “They are about economic competition. As the greatest economy in the history of the world, other countries will do anything to cripple the United States.”

Thresher, who has a PhD in Earth & Environmental Sciences from Columbia University and NASA GISS and worked for years in climate monitoring, says he understands the President’s temptation to listen to his daughter’s advice, but begs him not to give in to that temptation.

“Countries like China will agree to anything in these treaties and simply ignore their obligations while demanding the United States fulfill theirs,” Thresher said, calling belief in global warming a “popular delusion.”

In his letter, Dr. Thresher also reminded President Trump of his campaign promises that led many Americans to vote for him.

“We who voted for you consider stopping this climate change madness one of your key promises,” Thresher said. “If you renege on it you will lose me and many others as supporters.”

After Trump’s election, in fact, a number of climate change skeptics were emboldened to take more public stands against the politically imposed “scientific consensus” of global warming, welcoming a new era of free debate about a hotly contested issue.

Scientists unconvinced by the party line on climate change applauded Trump’s appointment of Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt to head up the Environmental Protection Agency as an important step away from climate alarmism.

Even if Trump caves and stays in the Paris climate agreement, Thresher says, it won’t win him any friends. “Your opponents are not going to support you; they’ll just taunt you as being a flip-flopper,” he said.

“Climate science is one of the most fascinating sciences there is. To turn it into a lie for political purposes is a crime,” he stated, before urging the President to stand strong in his convictions.

“Make climate science great again,” he wrote.

April 25, 2017 | 5 Comments »

Leave a Reply

5 Comments / 5 Comments

  1. “Peer-Reviewed Journal Publishes Gender Studies Hoax Claiming Penises Cause Climate Change” PETER HASSON, Associate Editor, 05/19/2017

    “A peer-reviewed academic journal published on Friday a hoax gender studies paper titled, “The Conceptual Penis As A Social Construct.”

    “Two academics, Peter Boghossian and James Lindsay, used pen names to successfully submit the hoax paper — which argued that “the penis vis-à-vis maleness is an incoherent construct” — to the peer-reviewed journal Cogent Social Sciences. Boghossian and Lindsay cited 20 sources, none of {which} they say they read, and five of which are fake papers that were “published” in journals that don’t actually exist.

    ‘The paper — which the authors said was “actively written to avoid having any merits whatsoever” — opened by stating, “The androcentric scientific and meta-scientific evidence that the penis is the male reproductive organ is considered overwhelming and largely uncontroversial.” It went downhill from there…”

    http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/19/conceptual-penis-gender-studies-hoax-gets-published-in-peer-reviewed-journal/

    — My typo correction in brackets – SZ

  2. Tree ring data suggests there have been temperature changes comparable to the present in the recent pre-industrial past. Alaska, largely empty, rose over 1 degree last year. Thus the vast natural climate forcing functions cannot be man-caused, and limiting economic activity cannot solve anything. Instead, technology including vast amounts of cheap electricity for heating and cooling, and market-driven migration of the sort that produced California(the historic human approach) must be part of the solution.
    David Sternlight, PhD (MIT, LSE)

  3. I am a retired chemist, who agrees with Dr. Williams and disagrees with Ivanka Kushner. I wonder if that makes me an antisemite? (Kushner is Jewish; Williams, as far as I know, is not). I also agree with the tenor of Sebastien Zorn’s critique. I guess that gets me off the “antisemite” hook a little, but not completely.

    I think Ivanka’s husband will one day be bad news, for Christians and Jews alike. Anyone who would not only buy 666 Fifth Avenue at record-breaking, inflated prices, in order to make it the “crown jewel” of his financial empire because it sat at the “center of the world”, either is ignorant of the Bible or has an agenda against it. I expect Christians and Jews alike to worship him, before he turns and kills them — unless I am completely wrong, in which case I will rejoice for Jared’s sake.

    Meanwhile, we have his worldly, ungodly advice, which he impresses on our President through his wife. We’ll see how this number plays out.

  4. It’s so ridiculous on the face of it. Even without knowing anything about science. The whole thing is about global warming. But, that turns out to be nonsense. So, now they say, it’s about climate change. But they’re still talking about warming. Which it isn’t. But they can’t call it that. So they say, ok it’s climate change but talk about warming. Is that smarmy and disingenuous or what?

    Now, here’s an example of real science. A cellist I knew about my age, up and died mysteriously. He was the only musician besides myself who always brought his own stand light to gigs knowing that if you don’t bring one, you will probably have to sit in darkness. Uh oh. I guess my days are numbered. Mustabeen bringing the standlight that killed ‘im.

    WHO KILLED “ER (Who Killed the Black Widder) by Hoagy Carmichael

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdxI1jZKIkU

    Somebody could do a funny parody of the Global Warming Crazies in the form of a fashion magazine for trendy pseudo-scientists like Vogue except it’s Science Fashions. Dating advice books with titles like: “Global Warming, excuse me, Climate Change and the Single Girl.”

    anybody remember:

    “Sex as a Sublimation for Tennis: From the Secret Writings of Freud Paperback – January 5, 1985
    by Theodor Saretsky Ph.D. (Author)

    “Normal red-blooded Americans prefer tennis to sex-and Sigmund Freud always knew it. the famous doctor surpressed his findings because of a morbid fear of white shorts, but now his secret papers have been discovered. Complete with case studies, photographs, personal correspondence, and seminal doodles, Sex as a Sublimation for Tennis explains the conclusions Freud hid and reveals man’s true basic drive: getting a court in prime time. 43,000 copies in print.”

    https://www.amazon.com/Sex-Sublimation-Tennis-Secret-Writings/dp/0894809121

    Well, how about

    Sex as a sublimation for Climate Change Science