Op-ed: Palestinian refugees are the only refugees in the world who maintain and bequeath refugee status;
As a result of the creation of the State of Israel in 1948, roughly 800,000 Jews were expelled from various Arab countries in which they had been living for generations.
Consequently, they were forced, like millions of other refugees throughout the 20th century, to resettle elsewhere. Although certainly not an easy task, eventually both the initial refugees and their descendants were able to let go of the past and move on with their lives.
Unlike the Jewish refugees from Arab countries, the story of the roughly 700,000 Arab refugees created by Israel’s War of Independence has been vastly different. Rather than being encouraged to resettle elsewhere, they were turned into permanent refugees to be used as a political tool against Israel. For this purpose, a special UN agency, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), was created in 1950 for the sole intent of maintaining, as opposed to resettling, the original refugees.
Even today, nearly seventy years later, UNRWA continues with this policy unabashedly. As they boldly state on their site “We are committed to fostering the human development of Palestine refugees by helping them to acquire knowledge and skills, lead long and healthy lives, achieve decent standards of living and enjoy human rights to the fullest possible extent.” Noticeably absent from this list is any attempt to help the refugees restart their lives in another place.
The exact opposite is the case for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), an agency that was also established in 1950 and which deals with every other other refugee population in the world. According to its site, “The agency is mandated to lead and co-ordinate international action to protect refugees and resolve refugee problems worldwide.”
In addition, it “strives to ensure that everyone can exercise the right to seek asylum and find safe refuge in another state, with the option to return home voluntarily, integrate locally or to resettle in a third country.” In other words, the emphasis is on problem resolution, a point that is proudly stated on its site: “Since 1950, the agency has helped tens of millions of people restart their lives.”
Thus, while UNHCR is constantly trying to lower the number of refugees in the world, UNRWA is actually working in the opposite direction. By an absurd policy that is unique to UNRWA and which states that “the descendants of Palestine refugee males, including legally adopted children, are also eligible for registration.” UNRWA has succeeded in turning the original half million into five million and counting.
In addition to the detrimental policies of UNRWA, which have deliberately kept the refugee issue alive for years, the refugees themselves—both the originals and their descendants—as well as the other Arabs living in Judea and Samaria, have been led to believe that eventually they would receive their own country somewhere west of the Jordan River. By some, they were told the new country would include their former homes in Haifa and Jerusalem, while by others they were promised a more modest state side by side with a tiny Jewish one. Different variations of these assurances have repeatedly been made to them over the years by assorted Arab leaders, western/international leaders and even some Israeli leaders.
Hence although the Arabs themselves, refugee or non-refugee, are partly to blame for not letting go of the past and simply moving on with their lives, it’s obvious that their permanent statelessness is also due to the fact that they’ve been a pawn in a much larger game.
What’s more, the seemingly endless bloody conflict between Jews and Arabs is the direct result of intentionally keeping this issue alive. This is by far the most tragic aspect of all the false promises and misleading UN policies. Nevertheless and despite the fact that at the moment there appears to be no end in sight to the conflict, something must be done since Israel cannot rule forever over another population with roadblocks and security checks and the Arabs cannot live eternally in a state of limbo.
Therefore, in order to finally break this vicious cycle and to allow everyone to move on with their lives, some truths must be faced. For starters, despite all the promises that have been made it’s clear to nearly everyone today that Israel cannot allow for the creation of an Arab state in any shape or size west of the Jordan River since such an entity would pose an existential threat to the very existence of the Jewish state. Thus, despite all the headlines that the two-state solution receives, practically speaking it’s a non-starter. More than twenty-two years of the failed Oslo Process and all the accompanying wars and terrorist attacks, as well as the still unfolding events of the “Arab Spring”, makes this point self-evident.
Equally suicidal for Israel is the granting of citizenship to another one or two million Arabs living in Judea and Samaria – many of whom consider Israel an enemy state – as part of any future process of Israel declaring sovereignty over these areas. The demographic and economic problems of such an endeavor, combined with the obvious security problem of absorbing a large hostile population, would surely overwhelm the Jewish state.
The only solution therefore, and by far the most humane one, is to rectify the injustice that was done to the Arabs by both the negligent polices of UNRWA and by years of being misled by false promises of statehood west of the Jordan River. Practically speaking, the Arabs need to be financially compensated and helped to resettle elsewhere, as the Jews from Arab countries did seventy years ago and as millions of refugees have done over the course of the last one hundred years as a result of various wars and conflicts. The new host country could be neighboring Jordan or another Arab country or wherever as long as it’s part of an international agreement. Such an agreement would also need to allow Israel to fortify its long-term security by extending Israeli sovereignty up to the natural border of the Jordan River.
Although such a suggestion may sound harsh to some people, the truth is it is the only way to resolve the one hundred year conflict and to stop the pointless and never-ending bloodshed between Jews and Arabs. Moreover, the idea of financially compensating the Arabs and helping them to resettle elsewhere as part of an international agreement is the only solution that will both guarantee the continued existence of the world’s only Jewish state as well as enable the Arabs to escape their prison of false promises and to finally start building normal productive lives.
For the well-being of both Jews and Arabs, the time has come to embrace the only solution that is truly capable of ending the conflict.
Yoel Meltzer, a freelance writer living in Jerusalem, has an MA in Middle Eastern Studies from New York University. He can be contacted via yoelmeltzer.com .
dove Said:
yes I know.
@ honeybee:
Thanks honeybee! It’s very therapeutic! 🙂
CuriousAmerican Said:
Treat them like Amer. Indians, put them reservations on worthless land and destroy them with Govt. hand outs.
@ dove:
You Go Girl !!!
@ CuriousAmerican:
lol……not at all!! What do the Christians say happens just before a fall? you know that answer or would you like me to tell it to your fat ego? Warning….danger…..
https://youtu.be/JFcj66ZMuzY
Wanna hear mine? :-):-):-)
Tell it to the person who wrote the article – not Ted
This farce has been created, condoned, supported and financed by the West. This is one of the elements of the overt war of the West against IL!
Ted that is not a well thought out title, inasmuch as 2 Million Palestinians already RESIDE in Judea and Samaria.
2 Million Palestinians are now residing in the area. The title suggests they be allowed to settle/remain … in Judea and Samaria.
The title INADVERTENTLY suggests they be allowed to reside in the area as Israel annexes it.
If you want the Palestinians moved out of the West Bank, then suggesting they be settled where they reside contraindicates that.
Poorly considered title.
Okay, I can understand why you do not want to enfranchise 2 Million Arabs, but until they are dealt with, you cannot annex the area.
I do not know if it is the most humane, but it is the most practical.
Wow! I have been saying this for years. Am I that influential?
No Arab country will take them, as a matter of their principles. Even Jordan is now withdrawing citizenship from them. (Click Here). This would be funny except Israel withdrew citizenship from them in 1952.
In any event, the Mideast, will not take them. I know of one area of the world that has taken in millions of Arabs, and prospered for it.
Does anyone want to know?
No problem there, but does Israel need anyone’s agreement to fortify their borders.
Does not sound so much harsh as what many of the early Zionists wanted all along but were afraid to admit. In 1938, the Jewish Agency talked about transfer of population of Arabs elsewhere.
Josef Weitz in 1940 wanted to expel them.
In 1989, Netanyahu said: “Israel should have taken advantage of the suppression of demonstrations [at China’s Tiananmen Square], when the world’s attention was focused on what was happening in that country, to carry out mass expulsions among the Arabs of the Territories. However, to my regret, they did not support that policy that I proposed, and which I still propose should be implemented.”
I suspect, many Zionists wanted them out from the beginning.
I am amazed how so many people are now reaching an idea I came up with five years ago.
But, who will pay for it?
We know who won’t pay for it.
1) Arab countries
2) Poor countries
3) Muslim countries
4) Russia
5) China
6) Japan
I have an idea which groups should contribute to paying for this. Wanna hear it?!
BIMKO directors must be place in detention, indicted and Jailed for breaking the law and permanently barred from area C. The arrogance is unbeleivable and should be severely dealt with with the highest allowable penalties under law. One more traitorous group of foreign funded moles.
Is BB a liar or an idiot? He is the PM he is the one who should see that Israeli law punishes these euro and arab criminals. He cannot pretend to act like an innocent bystander with responsibility both for the 7 years of facilitating these crimes AND for his refusing to see justice and law pursued against these euro criminals. If they break Israeli law they should be in jail and if diplomats they should be declared persona no grata and barred. The repetitive nature of these arrogant euro criminals rquires that all euro representatives are barred from the military district of area C and only euro tourists allowed in the area.
The incredible arrogance appears to say that the Israeli gov can go and build illegally in Europe too. The double standards of these disgusting and despicable euro creatures necessitates severe penalties under law.
WHY DOES NETANYAHU AND YAALON REFUSE TO BRING JUSTICE TO THE EURO CRIMINALS BREAKING ISRAELI LAW WHILE WHINING ABOUT JEWS COMPLYING WITH LAW?
they do not hesitate to stalk Jews on the Mount, at Duma and soldiers killing terrorists. All their recent Jew stalking is to distract from their collusion with the euros in these crimes. Yaalon speaks of law, ethics, values but he applies none in his continuing to allow the euro criminals free reign. Is yaalon pretending that these euros building illegally are not criminals? Criminals must be prosecuted, jailed, deported according to due process of law which is more than what yaalon gives the soldier. Yaalon the hypocrite lectures all while lying to all.
BB and yaalon are responsible for this debacle because they themselves are frauds pretending that they are not part of this agenda and complicit with the EU. Prove me wrong by applying the law to these euro criminals with jail and deportation and tearing down ALL their structures. BB whines for the press and tears down some tents and outhouses as a pretend show to the fool Israelis who keep buying this bullshite.