Mark Levin: Bernard Lewis to Today’s Iran Crisis

Peloni  & David Fieldstone

Mark Levin’s Show on Fox News of June 13, 2026. His 2 guests were (1) 4 Star General Jack Keane, and (2) US Senator Rick Scott (R – FL)

MARK opened with the opinion that a serious knowledge of material history is a sine qua non to understand the context and perspective of the world as it is today. He also opined on the meaning and use of a useless MOU as it is interpreted today. It is no more or less than and agreement to make an agreement, while negotiating.

MARK then opined that under any circumstance, ab initio, no one is able to satisfactory deal with the the ideology of the current leaders of Iran – which speaks to an insane religious cult which seeks to assuage Allah while waiting for the 12th IMAN (CLERIC) to appear once the entire world is under the control of the referenced crazy enablers.

MARK then reference the esteemed author and everything else connected therewith, Bernard Lewis, who then had a large audience (whereas the younger today have no clue as to who he was).  He anticipated what is happening now.  His bio is herein below. Kudos to Mark for referring to him: and reading a few of his statements: for going forward. The IRGC is no different than the NAZI SS.  Slaughtering the common residents of a nation for them is not a sin, but useful. The Saudis and Qataris were referenced – along with others as to their fake alliances inimical to our own progeny.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

GENERAL JACK KEANE  did not agree with the strategy of Trump, in that there could not be: any process with religious sub-humans (to be brief). The path Trump is on is an exercise in futility. So it needs to end now. The enemy does not respond to reality, ergo it needs to be decimated posthaste. There is no other solution.   It is also unfair to the common citizens of Iran who are being murdered by the 10’s of thousands, who now opined that Trump has stabbed them in the back, by not following through for ending this outrage they are suffering.

The referenced enemy have outsmarted Trump again and again, by bringing its proxy “Hezbollah” into the fray, by having it attack Israel, so as to give it another front (not only Hamas, Iran, and many others). As a consequence, it is Trump who has demanded that Israel should not properly protect itself so as to assist in his dealing with Iran (dumb). HAMAS is still operating in Gaza and beyond. It is not short of Funding. It owns the wealthy CAIR in the USA.

In 1983 and afterwards, Hezbollah could not be dealt with in Lebanon and beyond. Americans were murdered. The USA Embassy & Marine Barracks were blown up. Clinton was involved with the Khobar Towers. Later there was Somalia – and then 9/11, and all of the other later attacks on the USA by the Radicals Muslims – which are increasing exponentially.

In October7, the pre-planned attack v Israel was not to win a war – that was overreaching – but rather to force Israelis to leave for other homelands where they would be more safe for their children also – hence the slaughter – of children.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
SENATOR RICK SCOTT (R – FLORIDA) IS ON THE COMMITTEES WHICH DEAL WITH THE ABOVE.  He and most of them opine that the Iran deal made by President Obama was a TREATY needing Congressional Approval. (Obama never cared about the laws of the land. He was a chosen imposter who on the record – was not even a lawful American Citizen, and also a Muslim Appeaser – as likely he was one of them as he so admitted to.)

Scott opined that the MOU to be signed today to make a final deal sometime later on – is a farce and even stupid. He stated (not opined) that the usual list of needs from Trump would never be adhered to as they cannot. (SUPRA). He said that tiny Israel is the only one fighting all of the time. He also stated (not opined) that if the Iranian Leaders have a nuke, they will send it to Israel immediately, as it would be the Will of Allah. The USA would follow. Scott closed by stating that this matter must be taken seriously on facts as they are, and not with MOU’s. He is also very friendly to Israel and always has been. It is a reliable partner with America and with the same objectives.

 ____________________________________________________________________________________________
MARK CLOSED his show by stating that TRUMP is OK. as no other President has done anything useful.  I was surprised that Mark would say that. Doing wrong things evergreen is just as bad or worse than doing nothing. He had no doubt that post Pres. Reagan, no one until Trump was serious about the above. It may be in that they had wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and so on, to deal with – while Iran was quiet on that front.

Addendumm

Related material

• Bernard Lewis – Jewish Virtual Library

• An MOU, or Memorandum of Understanding, is a formal, nonbinding agreement between two or more parties that outlines mutual intentions and expectations for collaboration or action.
  Definition and Purpose

A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is a written document that establishes a shared understanding between parties about their intended actions, responsibilities, and goals without creating a legally enforceable contract Corporate Finance Institute. MOUs are commonly used in business deals, government collaborations, international relations, and organizational partnerships to clarify expectations and define the scope of cooperation before formal contracts are drafted Corporate Finance Institute.
Key Features

Nonbinding Nature: While formal, an MOU is generally not legally enforceable, serving instead as a record of intent and agreement on key points Corporate Finance Institute.
Clarity of Roles: It outlines the roles, responsibilities, and obligations of each party, helping prevent misunderstandings U.S. Department of Education.
Scope and Objectives: MOUs specify the purpose, goals, and expected outcomes of the collaboration, including timelines and resources involved U.S. Department of Education.
Bilateral or Multilateral: MOUs can involve two parties (bilateral) or multiple parties (multilateral), depending on the context Corporate Finance Institute.