Mark Levin: The Fusion of Marxism, Islamism and Nullification towards One Party Rule and the Fall of the West

Peloni

Mark Levin July 19 Show

In his opening segment of Saturday’s show, Mark discusses the disturbing, somewhat inexplicable, fusion taking place between the Marxists and the Islamists as personified by Zohran Mamdani and his election bid in NYC as mayor, as well as with Rep. Omar and Tlaib, and across the capitals and campuses of the Western world.  Mark explains that President Trump stands resolved to defeat this rising threat to the Western world and the American people.  To this fusion, Mark describes one more element characterizing this amalgamating threat to Western society as being the attempt to establish a policy of nullification of Constitutional authority of the federal govt, whereby the authority of the US govt is transformed to the advantage of this threat of the Marxist-Islamist fusion.

Subscribe to Israpundit Daily Digest for Free

Explaining further, Mark notes that the intent of this nullification policy is to replace the authority of a republican (small ‘R’) govt with an all encompassing and all powerful, one-party ruled, centralize authority, the very antithesis of what characterizes American govt and adherence to the American Constitution.  The effort to defy long established immigration law is one aspect of this nullification process.  While explaining that the supremacy clause of the Constitution does not establish complete supremacy of federal power over the states and local authority, Mark reminds us that there are avenues of process which must be followed to avoid the unraveling of society into open anarchy, and that this latter point should be understood to be the intended and obvious result of pursuing policies of nullification as being pursued by the Democrats on a host of topics, as will be discussed further below.  In describing all of this, Mark also shares the impossibility of secession being due to the fact that as the states join the American Union, the citizens of the state became citizens of the American nation, and secession of a state from this union would therefore be a violation of the federal rights of the relevant citizens, all of which was described by James Madison.

Hence, beginning with the policy of open borders, moving towards open defiance of law enforcement, and denying the legitimacy of deportations, nullification is fast becoming the front line tool of the left in its quest towards greater and greater power as described by Mark.  He further notes that the Democrats are using open border policies to expand their base, yet by doing so the American nation will cease to exist as it is known today, but that the Democratic party will survive, becoming unopposed as it dilutes the voice and power of the American people in the sea of illegal immigrants.

As Mark notes, the use of nullification is not intended to benefit the nation nor the people, but to benefit the Democrat party and their pursuit of one party rule in the US.  Beyond immigration policy, the Democrats have used nullification in other areas as well such as denying the authority of police enforcement in general, the process of decriminalizing crime, encouraging open assault upon law enforcement officers, and rewriting history to delegitimize the values and magnificent achievements of Western society as being racist and fascist.

In closing his opening statement, Mark addresses the otherwise intuitive conflicts which exist between Marxism and Islamism, one defying religion and the other being the political manifestation of a religion.  The commonality which exists between these two otherwise disparate ideologies is the pursuit of the fall of Western society.  Following the achievement of this long sought objective of the Marxists and the Islamists, these two competing interests will have the opportunity to battle out which ideology has the strength and resolve to then defeat the other, but til the West is defeated, these competing ideologies will cooperate towards seeing the West obliterated.   With the fall of the West, the established values system, stemming from the dignities of men being  an extension of faith in G_d, the falseness of kings, the power of the people and the foundation of equality before the law, will all vanish from the earth.  And in the wake of the collapse of the West, an altogether new era of darkness, servitude and butchery will rise without opposition, as the Islamist and Marxists will then be able to see which of these two great ideological monstrosities will ultimately reign supreme.

In his second segment, Mark talks with Rep. Elise Stephanik about the Democrat run political system in NYC which has advantaged the Marxist-Islamist fusion he described in his opening statement.  Stephanik describes the lack of moral clarity as displayed by the Democratic leadership, in the US congress and across the political leaders of New York State, including the governor.   She also explores the flight from NY which is the consequence of the Marxist policies being supported in New York Democrats.

In his third and final segment, Mark interviews Mark Hoffman as they describe Trump’s recent change of policy towards Ukraine and against Russia.  While I can’t follow the reason or rationale or benefit behind Trump latest policy change, it seems clear that Mark does.

Mark Levin July 20 Show

In his opening segment on Sunday’s show, Mark revisits the attempted revolution being pursued by the Left.  Relatedly, he recalls the writings of Aristotle related to immigration.  Noting that Aristotle warned that a radical change in the character of the citizens of a society would be tantamount to regime change of that society, Mark reminds us that the purpose of US immigration policy is to serve the citizens of the US, not to overwhelm the influence of the American people nor to destabilize the American govt.  In doing so, he further notes Aristotle warning that immigrants should be made to assimilate to the culture, customs and  morals of the current citizenry of the nation, none of which has taken place over the past several decades.  Citing the Declaration of Independence, Mark reminds us that it is the citizens of the nation who are the sovereign of the nation, and that immigration can not be allowed to change this fact.  Detailing that the established law governing the process of immigration is being circumvented by the Democrats and their allies in the media, it is these established laws which Pres. Trump is currently trying to enforce as he reasserts immigration into what it was meant to be as described by Aristotle.

Citing a number of long established legal codes, Mark shows the legitimacy and authority under which Trump is attempting to reestablish order and simply enforce the laws which have for too long gone ignored, and more importantly, that the Marxist-Islamists are trying to manifest as illegal and illegitimate.  What is more is that the Biden administration upended every aspect of border control towards the functional elimination of the border, resulting in millions  of people entering the US without documentation, without accountability, without the ability to track them, without the ability to vet them.  A caveat to this border lawlessness under Biden saw the unhinged flooding of fentanyl, drugs, weapons and sex trafficking into the US, all of which remains unaddressed as the Democrats continue to pull every lever imaginable to obstruct every remedy to solve these inhumane policies which they assert should replace the law of the land as they pursue the dilution of the will of the American people, one party rule, and ultimately, the denigration of American society and values.

In the second segment, Mark talks with Speaker Mike Johnson about recent and planned future Congressional legislation.  They also discuss the gulf between the Republicans and Democrats, as the Democratic party has evolved into the Marxist-Islamist described above.  Johnson notes that the Democrats lack the leadership required to draw the party back towards the center and away from the fringe ideology which characterizes much of the Democratic party today.

In the third and final segment, Mark talks with Gen. Jack Keane regarding Trump’s move towards supporting Ukraine.  Keane argues that Putin will more readily respond to battlefield losses than it will to economic sanctions, presumably suggesting a rationale for the shift in Trump’s policy of arming Ukraine.

Gen. Keane also goes on to describe the situation in Syria, in which over a thousand people have been murdered in an attempt to slaughter the Druze community there.  Israel came to support the Syrian Druze, only to hear reports of the Syrian govt moving forces into the area to support the Bedouin massacres of the Druze.  The resulting attacks by Israel on the Syrian capital echoes the stunning shift in policy by Jolani’s govt away from a non-aggression pact with Israel and support of the slaughter which took place among the Druze in Syria.

 

July 21, 2025 | 12 Comments »

Leave a Reply

12 Comments / 12 Comments

  1. Islam is very hot on private property so it is NOT going to meld with Marxist collectivism about big capital or even litttle variants.

    Too many “Marxists” only want to support Islamic adventures to crack and break “capitalism” but are too ignorant to remember the Ayatollahs took advantage of this naivete and then shot every Iranian Marxist and trades uniionist they could catch. This will be a far more useful appraoach than waffle about mergers.

    As for Marxism it is the politcal equivalent of measles – 19th century killer in industrial slums. Give people the vaccine of education ie opportunities and jobs and it evaporates. Remember the ten bullet points at the end of the Marx and Engels Manifesto – 1848 is a long time ago! – include: income tax;
    taking children out of factory [and agricultural] labour
    and putting them to school;
    economic control of credit by central banking;
    government control and supervision of communications and transport;
    the direction of the unemployed to work on public projects;
    Even Ronnie Reagan would not object so far NOR even the John Birch Society.
    The bits that non Communists, liberals and social democrats protest and object are the clauses about taking into pubic ownership bourgeois or capital property – and the autocratic about banishing rebels and exiles etc which is pre-Enlightenment residue. This neglects that it is the USA that made the difference between ownership and regulated control with public policy in mind iinto a permanent feature of peacetime government pioneered by the wartime command economies to win WW I then WW II. Reagan’s regulators in effect said damn and own as much as you like BUT we the goveernment shall appoint regulators to supervise and punish such industries as do not stick to health and safety and fraud laws.
    Now in the mid 21 century stick to kicking Islamism: read about Islam, buy a pbk Koran and highlight the verses that are patently untrue – Jews kiling prophets, 9.30 the verse to beat up the World till everybody takes to Moslem rites….

  2. “Some of Mamdani’s platform is surprisingly similar to Bloomberg’s, experts say
    Bloomberg spent $8 million backing Cuomo’s bid to become the Democratic nominee.

    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/mamdanis-platform-surprisingly-similar-bloombergs-experts/story?id=124005077

    He’s the pro-BDS, anti-ICE, defund the police. candidate.

    As I said to an approving non-Jewish African-American friend recently:

    “The problem is not his economic proposals, BUT THE FACT THAT HE’S A F*CKING T*RRORIST!” *


    I saw that Melanie Philips – who doesn’t want her stuff posted here so I won’t – has a podcast called, “Will New York become London?” And I read an article by somebody else about how London’s mayor, Sadiq Khan, has been advising Mamdani and telling him to move his rhetoric towards the center to win the general election after veering left to his base in the primary.

    Which brings me to my most important point, here at election ground zero, as I fiddle with the window curtains on the deck of the Titanic, or more aptly, Lusitania:

    A post popped up on my FB news feed that said: “Do you know that if you say, “f*ck off” backwards, you get a British accent?” *

    Yohay Sponder reminds us what a British accent sounds like here, for thoser of us who forgot:

    “When a Brit calls you a colonizer.”

    https://youtu.be/kZ_z1zueOjA?si=u294kvY76_6pc_qZ

    Another amusing line from an otherwise inspiring but most certainly not funny movie that happens to be one of the rare movies from the era about the Holocaust that actually deigns to mention Jews, if only passing, it’s even pro-Israel. Amazon Prime Video has it, at least in this region. “The Search” (1948) Mongomery Clift. Worth watching and a great mother’s day fiim, too. Tear jerker:

    “English is a great language to learn, they speak it everywhere, even in England, kind ‘a”

    ===


    * “All theories have been exploded.” “Night Song” (1947) directed by John Cromwell (who would go on to become one of the “Hollywood Ten” a couple of years later.

    My comment: Don’t you just love it when you come across universal formulas that actually work as advertised?

    Great classical music movie with an all star cast, incidentally. Largely unknown, Prime Video has it. Discovered it during cable era when Turner Classical Movies would show it once a year on Ethel Barrymore’s birthday.

  3. “At one point, Mamdani went so far as to state that “seizing the means of production” was the “end goal,”

    quote from below article:

    “Video exposes Mamdani as more radical than thought. It is indisputable that many of the policies and beliefs he espouses are alarmingly tied to antisemitic ideologies.”

    https://www.jns.org/video-exposes-mamdani-as-more-radical-than-thought/

    I watched the entire 44 minute embedded video of the event and I didn’t hear the phrase, “seize the means of production.” Did I miss it? If so, where is it located, please?

    He talks about his BDS ambitions in detail at around 30 minutes but I missed the other. I don’t feel like wading through it again.

    Ultimately, he would like to build up electoral strength in numbers in the State Assembly and Senate and overturn former Governor Cuomo’s ban on BDS. He also wants to build up a movement to pack the Supreme Court.

  4. “Zohran Mamdani is calling for city owner grocery stores. NYC already has them.”

    My comment: The elephant in the room is his antisemitism snd jihadist terrorist allegiances not his economic proposals which are just social-democratic ameliorative reforms he is using as his hook.

    “The issue is not the issue. Power is the issue.” – Saul Alinsky

    https://gothamist.com/news/zohran-mamdani-is-calling-for-city-owned-grocery-stores-nyc-already-has-them

    • @felix 😀 I’m reminded of:

      AI Overview

      +1
      “In the 1967 movie The Producers, Franz Liebkind, played by Kenneth Mars, famously protests that “The Führer has never said ‘baby’!” This line is a comedic point of contention, as he is rewriting a play about Hitler and is upset that the character says “baby” in a song, insisting Hitler would never have used that word. The phrase “baby” is used in the context of the song “Springtime for Hitler”, and Liebkind is vehemently against this portrayal of Hitler.”

  5. Peloni writes about Levin supporting the Neonazis in Ukraine

    “In his third and final segment, Mark interviews Mark Hoffman as they describe Trump’s recent change of policy towards Ukraine and against Russia. While I can’t follow the reason or rationale or benefit behind Trump latest policy change, it seems clear that Mark does. ”

    How do you characterise Levin in support of these Neonazis in Ukraine?

    Seems a central issue for the Jewish people

  6. Does the paragraph from the article use the word SUCCESSION….

    In describing all of this, Mark also shares the impossibility of succession being due to the fact that as the states join the American Union, the citizens of the state became citizens of the American nation, and succession of a state from this union would therefore be a violation of the federal rights of the relevant citizens, all of which was described by James Madison.

    OR – should it be – secession

    secession refers to withdrawing from a political entity, while succession refers to inheriting or taking over something

    Just wondering……..