T. Belman. The title refers to “antisemitism” appropriately, whereas the sub-title refers to “anti-semitism”. I suggest the editor consciously did so because that’s the term or the spelling commonly used today. But he is wrong. Obviously an anti-semite hates semites as opposed to only Jews. “Antisemitism” is a unique word pertaining only to treatment of Jews and should be the only spelling used.
When I grew up in the fifties and sixties, in the shadow of the holocaust, no one ever wrote “anti-semitism”. Antisemitism was the only word in use. So, I ask, how and why did this incorrect spelling come into vogue.
The first editor of the Oxford English Dictionary thought the term “anti-Semite” would be short lived and thus did not include it in the original edition of the massive lexicon.
By MARCY OSTER/JTA

Oxford, All Souls College (photo credit: Wikimedia Commons)
The first editor of the Oxford English Dictionary thought the term “antisemite” would be short lived and thus did not include it in the original edition of the massive lexicon.
A 1900 letter by the editor, James Murray, explaining why he omitted the term was discovered recently in the archives of the National Library of Israel in Jerusalem and placed online. The OED was first published in several installments between 1884 and 1928.
Murray, a British lexicographer, was writing to scholar and anti-Zionist Claude Montefiore, great-nephew of Moses Montefiore, one of the most important early supporters of the modern Zionist movement. The letter appears to be in response to a query from Montefiore.
Read more…