T. Belman. Amidror is an insider and close to Netanyahu. He argues, as does Netanyahu,
Imposing Israeli sovereignty on Area C would be akin to a nonverbal declaration of a binational state, because should this move be pursued no one in the Palestinian side would be willing to negotiate with Israel. The bottom line here is that if a binational state is the endgame, it should be pursued openly and honestly.
And he warns,
Should that be the case, the international community would punish Israel mercilessly, and some are likely to push for statements, perhaps even sanctions, harsher than anything seen today, including a potential official boycott of Israel.
Instead, he argues, as does Netanyahu,
Israel should focus on improving the lives of the Palestinians, as well as on how to navigate the situation the day after Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas’ regime ends, as he has no heir apparent.
Obviously the international community and Netanyahu aren’t prepared to say “no” to a Palestinian state. Nor are they prepared to support a plan for compensated Arab emigration. In fact they support the opposite, namely, the Arab “right of return”.
By Yaakov Amidror, ISRAEL HAYOM
[..]
With little optimism as to the future of the peace process, there is little wonder that many in Israel are feeling distressed. The prolonged stagnation, compounded by the inability to present any viable alternative that would lead to a comprehensive change, has bred suggestions meant to promote their proponents’ various worldviews, all under the guise of “partial steps seeking to meet current challenges.”
An in-depth study of these suggestions, however, reveals that they do not solve any of the problems at hand, as all they seek to do is promote the various parties’ interests. Worse, the majority of these suggestions include unilateral measures, which are harmful and cannot help the situation.
Read more…