The Two-state Evolution and the “Apartheid” Option
T. Belman. The author suggests that Bennett’s plan leads Israel to an apartheid solution which forces Netanyahu to stand by his “two states for two people” solution. Ironically, just this week I posted Mike Wise’s draft “One State Plan” and a discussion between Wise and Martin Sherman who backs compensated emigration and myself who backs Bennett’s ideas. We all concluded that the worst option is the two-state solution. We also concluded that Bennett’s plan of annexing Area C is the easiest sale leaving the question of what to do with Area’s A and B for later. This would be no more apartheid than the Oslo Accords.
The choice for Israelis then would be, do they prefer absorbing 1.7 million Arabs into Israel from the river to the sea or spending $150 billion to induce Arabs to emigrate.
With radicals pushing for either a multi-national state or an apartheid one, the two-state solution might finally have its political day in the sun.
By Carolina Landsmann, HAARETZ

This time it was U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry who forced Benjamin Netanyahu to express public support for the idea of two states for two peoples: “The solution is a demilitarized Palestinian state that will recognize the Jewish state,” he claimed.
Experience teaches us that Netanyahu most likely won’t stand by his claim. But the context in which he made it – cornered into rejecting the alternative of a binational state– could indicate the evolution of the two-state solution, and signal its revival.
Read more…









By Jerry Gordon, NER


