Israel’s Five Policy Options Regarding Judea and Samaria
T. Belman. The first thing Israel should do is wipe out all illegal Arab construction.
The solutions offered by Caroline Glick of annexing all J&S and offering a path to citizenship or by Martin Sherman of annexing all the land and inducing emigration of Arabs with a carrot and a stick, did not even make the list.
By Prof. Hillel Frisch, BESA Center Perspectives Paper No. 336
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: When Mahmoud Abbas departs from his post as leader of the Palestinian Authority, Israel will have to make strategic choices. This paper discusses five possible policy approaches, none of which is ideal. They are caretaker conflict resolution, creative friction, constructive chaos, unilateral withdrawal, and unilateral annexation. The caretaker option is probably the most feasible; unilateral withdrawal is the least. In every case, however, Israel will have to maintain a military presence in Judea and Samaria.


The soldier in Hebron shouldn’t have had to pull the trigger and kill the terrorist who had just attempted to murder his comrade. The officers in the area should have done so, and the order should have come from the Chief of Staff, the Minister of Security, and the Prime Minister. It should have been an order that was as clear as day and made public to all. Let me explain:



