Ted Belman. This Haaretz editorial correctly identifies Netanyahu’s position on the conflict and notes that it is supported by a majority of Israelis. It concludes with this:
The regime described in Netanyahu’s vision has a name – it’s called apartheid. There is no other term for two populations living in the same area, one with political rights and the other under perennial military occupation. No security argument or warnings about the effects of Islam can whitewash the implications of this vision. Netanyahu’s words should shock anyone who is concerned about the justice of Israel’s cause and the country’s future. Concerned people should unite and form a national salvation front that will work to replace this government.
If Israel’s choice is between an “apartheid state” and a neighbour state dedicated to its destruction, I choose the former.
If I am holding a tiger by the tail and that is the only thing preventing it from eating me, I would never let go even if I was not being fair to the tiger.
To the contrary, I believe that “the justice of Israel’s cause and her country’s future” depend on Israel claiming sovereignty over all of Judea and Samaria.
If the Palestinian Nazis wanted to end the “occupation” they could always abandon the maximalist demands and settle for less. But they won’t. They won’t give up on their desire to eradicate Israel.
In the real world, outside the realm of speechmaking, Netanyahu is only ready to hold empty and aimless talks with the Palestinians.
Haaretz Editorial
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu presented his current political vision to the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee this week. While saying that that he does not want a binational state, Netanyahu stressed that Israel “must control the entire area for the foreseeable future.” He explained that he was prepared to divide the land but “the other side is unwilling,” and that the Middle East is subject to Islamic religious influences that preclude any possibility for peace.
Read more…