Israel using old airstrike policy with new Syrian gov’t – is it outdated?
Peloni: The divisions among the Druze and the disparate interest of the various factions regarding Israel’s support of their situation, it begs the question as to what Israel’s next step should be given the all too likely possibility that air strikes will not secure the safety of the Kurds in Syria.
The Druze in Syria are divided between different leaders and voices. It’s likely that many want a middle ground and prefer some kind of autonomy but don’t want a full break with Damascus.
By SETH J. FRANTZMAN |
27th Adir F35 arrival at Nevatim, August 2020 (Photo by U.S. Embassy Jerusalem – DSC_6967SM, CC BY 2.0)
Israel has carried out two sets of airstrikes on Syria over the last two days. In the first hours of Saturday morning the IDF said that “a short while ago, the IDF struck a military site, anti-aircraft cannons, and surface-to-air missile infrastructure in Syria.” On Friday, the IDF said “IDF fighter jets struck adjacent to the area of the Palace of Hussein al-Sharaa in Damascus.”

Debris in Gaza. (Photo by Naaman Omar apaimages, by WAFA (Q2915969) in contract with a local company (APAimages)?? – Correspondence with Wiki Palestine (Q117834684)??, 

David Horowitz (Photo by Gage Skidmore from Peoria, AZ, United States of America,
[Many in Israel] demand a zero-tolerance policy towards illegal construction, regardless of EU funding and lawsuits, and have called on the Israeli government to initiate a long-overdue diplomatic effort that will make it clear to the EU that it has established red lines that will be enforced. Pictured: Detailed map released by @landuse outlining the extent of illegal Palestinian construction in 2005 

By Unknown author – The Israel Internet Association via the PikiWiki – Israel free image collection project,
Jerry Nadler (Photo by David from Washington, DC – _25A7329, 


Israeli box

