Leave a Reply

4 Comments / 4 Comments

    • The CDC have had a VAERS backlog since at least April per Dr. Rose. She noted that they seemed to be catching up in the summer, but then the children vaccinations began and then the boosters and the backlog grew huge again. She has noted with the rolling boosters ever quarter or every month(yep, their is talk about it), they will never catch up.

      Dr. Rose and others have noted that some cases that are processed and added to VAERS are being removed as well during the weekly updates. She notes the number is not enormous or focused, so she suspects a programming anomaly, but it is concerning, as she only caught it by accident and the cases are not returning. She is questioning what happened to the missing cases and who is overseeing the process.

      There is just no transparency in any of this, and that is quite by design.

  3. “of 32 pregnancies with known outcome, 28 resulted in fetal death”
    This is a must read article, every section is revealing and damaging to the claim the vaccines should be allowed, much less mandated, to pregnant women, of all people:

    Table 6 states that of 270 “unique pregnancies” that were exposed to the vaccine, “no outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies.”

    This leaves 32 pregnancies with known outcomes.

    Pfizer’s report states that there were 23 spontaneous abortions (miscarriages), two premature births with neonatal death, two spontaneous abortions with intrauterine death, one spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and one pregnancy with “normal outcome.” That means that of 32 pregnancies with known outcome, 28 resulted in fetal death.

    Pfizer’s report states that there were five pregnancies with “outcome pending” as well as the 238 with “no outcome provided.” But 32 minus 28 equals four, not five.

    Because of this confusion, I called Pfizer and emailed questions to their media rep. Were 28 of 32 known pregnancy outcomes actually fatal in the first 10 weeks that the vaccine became available, as their report suggests? That’s an 87.5% pregnancy loss rate? And only one pregnancy outcome was “normal”? Please correct me if I’m wrong about this.

    No reply.

    The FDA would have had these data in their hands by the end of April. Maybe this is why they wanted to hide it for 55 years?

    Ordinarily, when a new drug or medical device is put into action, the onus is, and should be, on the drug maker to prove that any unexpected events that occur afterwards are not related to the product. “All spontaneous reports have an implied causal relationship as per regulatory guidance, regardless of the reporter’s assessment,” according to adverse event reporting guidelines. But Pfizer and the FDA ignored events with temporal association and plausible cause for injury and have blithely declared the vaccine “safe and effective” for pregnant women.

    Allowed it to be mandated, even.

    Here is the full article, please read it:
    https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/horrifying-hidden-pfizer-data-show-unborn-babies-newborns-dying/