The clever cognitive war strategy deployed against Israel

When it comes to Israel, there are no facts and no objectivity, just clever confusion and demonization over and over until the lies become Holy Doctrine.

By Prof. Phyllis Chesler, INN

Following in UNESCO’s 2017 footsteps, Amnesty International has just released a Report which accuses Israel of trying to Judaize Jerusalem (!) According to Gerald Steinberg at NGO Monitor:

“On January 29, 2019, Amnesty International published “The Tourism Industry and Israeli Settlements,” a report alleging that “the Israeli government has political and ideological reasons for developing a tourism industry in occupied East Jerusalem and Area C of the West Bank.” According to Amnesty, “Israel has constructed many of its settlements close to archaeological sites … [as] part of an active campaign to normalize and legitimize Israel’s increasing control of the OPT.”

This publication is “part of a broader campaign of BDS to bolster the forthcoming UN BDS blacklist. Amnesty denies Jewish connections to historical sites – including in the Old City of Jerusalem – and in essence faults Israel for preserving Jewish historical and cultural heritage, as well as places that are holy to Christians. (Further), by suggesting that foreign tourism to Israel is about supporting settlements, not about religious and/or historical interest, Amnesty International erases the Christian connection to the Holy Land.”

The propaganda against Israel which desires its isolation and de-legitimization exists on every continent. It is deeply rooted and geographically expansive. The following is just one of hundreds, if not thousands, of daily, ongoing,  campaigns against the Jews in cities all across America.

This past weekend, on January 26th, 2019, the Pittsburgh Theological Seminary sponsored its 21st Racial Justice Summit. The third panel of the day was titled “Rewriting the Narrative: Reimagining the Future.” Someone in attendance wrote to me, in a small panic. She is afraid to be quoted by name but sent me a video of the third panel which, quite frankly, frightened and appalled her.

I have now viewed most of it. And I share her concern. Yes, Pittsburgh is where the abominable massacre of eleven Jews at prayer took place last fall. One might expect a heightened sensitivity, especially among justice-seeking Christian theologians. One’s hopes would be misplaced. Sadly, few progressives are willing to understand the connection between Jews and Jewish Israel, or the way in which the issue of Palestine is being used to defame Jews and incite large populations of aggrieved justice-seekers to potentially exterminate the Jews—yet again.

In Pittsburgh, it’s not only what invited panelist Susan Abulhawa, identified as a Palestinian-American novelist, said. It’s also who the moderator was. The same Big Lies, are, alarmingly everywhere, and increasing at warp speed. According to Abulhawa:

“Initially, when Zionism was born in Europe it was a political movement that was conceived by wealthy Jewish businessmen in eastern Europe and the idea was to establish a Jewish homeland. When all these Zionists started immigrating to Palestine and eventually took over the country and kicked the indigenous people out, the narrative was that these Europeans who had been in Europe for thousands of years, who had documented European history for thousands of years, in literature, and art, and culture, in science and politics, that these people were actually indigenous to Palestine and the indigenous people who had been there were, in fact, the squatters…”

This view is precisely that taken by the production of the opera Klinghoffer at the Metropolitan Opera. Onstage, the Jews were portrayed as only recent European arrivals with suitcases. The Palestinian chorus rose as if earth-bound, indigenous, native.

Abulhawa continued:

“The earliest story was that Palestine was a land without a people, for a people without a land. We didn’t even exist in that original narrative. The story of a land without a people, for a people without a land was so enticing to the west, it was the perfect ending to their own crimes. It was a happy ending. It was romantic. Three-quarters of the population had been expelled and pushed into refugee camps and were not allowed to return while Europeans and Jews from all over the world continued pouring into Palestine. We were going from one port to another, we were waiting in camps. It was only when Palestinians started highjacking planes that the west was like, oh wait, there’s such a thing as Palestinians. And so we exerted at least our presence in the late 60s and early 70s through violence, through violent resistance.

“And so then the narrative switched. It was Palestinians are terrorists. Now that narrative has persisted to this day. As long as the world can believe that, then everything Israel does is ok with us. As long as people believe that Black men are thugs, gangsters, mass incarceration is ok. As long as people can believe that Iraqis had WMDs or that they oppress their women, whatever, going in and destroying that beautiful, sophisticated, high-functioning ancient society was ok. Likewise, in Libya, in Afghanistan, in Syria. So narrative is where everything begins. It’s where cruelty begins. So now Palestinians have, because we live in a diaspora, many of us ended up in western countries, like myself. And we’ve learned western languages. And we begin to rewrite our narrative. In the same way that once Black America was able to get an education, they produced this whole canon of literature and culture and actually defined the culture of this country.”

One does not know where to begin. But notice how seamlessly Abulhawa equates the Palestinian situation with that of Black Americans. Notice how she minimizes the oppression of women in Muslim and Arab society. Above all, notice how she fails to mention the 850,000 Mizrahi and Sephardi Jews from Arab and Muslim countries who had been second- and third-class citizens and who were finally forced to flee with only the proverbial shirts on their backs when they were finally forced out. Perhaps Abulhawa should view Pierre Rehov’s film The Silent Exodus.

Abulhawa’s first novel, was titled “The Scar of David” (2006, 2010) and is about an Israeli soldier stealing an Arab (Palestinian) child and giving the boy to a “Polish Holocaust survivor” in Israel. It was re-titled “Mornings in Jenin” and has since been translated into twenty-seven languages. French philosopher, Bernard Henri Levy, described the book as “a concentration of anti-Israeli and anti-Jewish cliches masquerading as fiction.” In turn, Abulhawa discredited Levy as a “French pop star of philosophy and intellectual elitism,” which is not exactly an issue-based rejoinder. Insults, not facts.

The Pittsburgh Theological Seminary panel moderator was Bekezala Mguni, identified as an African-American librarian and artist, who has worked with “LGBTQIA communities and with the Black Unicorn Project, a Black, queer, feminist library archive.” Perhaps less known is her participation in Librarians and Archivists with Palestine. Mguni was part of a delegation of librarians, archivists, and “information workers” who visited Palestine in 2013. Here is the Solidarity Statement she signed after the visit:

“We respected the Palestinian civil society call for Boycott, Divestments and Sanctions (BDS) against Israel…(our purpose) was to bear witness to the destruction and appropriation of information about Palestinian pasts and presents and to support efforts to preserve cultural heritage…(we were) eager to dispense with the superficial and inaccurate portrayals of life in Palestine/Israel that we see in the West and to learn about the realities of life under occupation and settler colonialism.”

Again, where to begin: Do these librarians have absolutely no knowledge of the very long Jewish presence in Israel/Jordan/Transjordan? I guess not. Do they know nothing about the archeological findings in Israel/Jordan/Transjordan that far, far outweigh anything to which Muslims and Christians can also lay claim? Do they know how the Waqf has tried to disappear evidence of the First and Second Temples on the Temple Mount?

Mguni’s Solidarity statement consistently refers to “1948 Palestine (Israel).” It describes a horror-landscape of “checkpoints and watchtowers, metal detectors, and settler militias.” It discusses “Israeli apartheid and colonialism.”

Not all Palestinians are thrilled about the global BDS movement against Israel. Perhaps the librarians might read Palestinian activist and journalist Bassem Eid’s analysis of this.

The statement talks about visiting “the rubble of villages that were destroyed in 1948.” As a librarian, Mguni is particularly upset by the “erasure of Palestinian culture and history (which is) a tactic of war and occupation.” Then there is this: “In Nabi Saleh, weekly nonviolent demonstrations against the confiscation of the community’s land and water are met with extreme violence from the Israeli military.”

Non-violent? Is she and the other signatories kidding?

Now where have I heard about Nabi Saleh? Ah yes. It is home to the infamous Tamimi clan which included the blonde, curly-headed Ahed Tamimi who spits, slaps, and incites Israeli soldiers as the video cameras roll—as well as the home of other violent Tamimi terrorists (whose cause Abulhawa has already justified). And Ahed has male relatives who have done far more than physically assault Israelis.

More: If these librarians had only dared read Tuvia Tenenbom’s Catch the Jew! they would understand the nature of the Potemkin Villages that the Palestinian Authority and Hamas in Gaza create for visiting journalists. The media is shown only staged events—and then threatened with death or the destruction of their equipment and notes if theyreport anything else.

Mguni’s delegation was particularly interested in a Palestinian museum dedicated to “challenging the process of ethnic cleansing and the erasure of cultural memory… We learned about the articulation of Palestinian-specific understandings of sexual identity, and the Singing Sexuality project, which discusses sexuality through music.”

As a “Black unicorn” she fails to mention the profound homophobia on the ‘West Bank’ and in Gaza and the fact that Palestinian homosexuals routinely flee to Israel for asylum (which is, invariably, granted). The Solidarity statement fails to mention the increased misogyny and oppression of girls and women in Gaza and on the ‘West Bank’. The statement does not include honor-based violence, honor killing, forced face veiling, child marriage, or polygamy as part of the “indigenous” Palestinian culture.

The poisoned propaganda about Race and about Palestine (the two subjects are now diabolically twinned), includes doctored footage; a media held hostage by terrorists; pre-emptive media strikes before the facts are known; dangerously biased reportage.

However, these Lies have been told so often and so well that they now constitute Holy Doctrine. Their presence is repeated almost everywhere (in classrooms, at conferences, in reviews of published books, online, in the media, at the United Nations). Lately, the momentum seems to be accelerating. As a friend put it: “Hatred sure rides a fast horse.”

Sitting at my desk, I receive countless, endless, examples of how religion is being confused with race; how Palestinians are being confused with African-Americans; how the history of slavery in America and South African Apartheid are both being confused with alleged European “settler” colonialism—especially in a small part of the Jewish Middle East.

Something like this cannot be happening by chance or coincidence alone. This strongly suggests a cognitive war strategy that has been deployed for the last fifty years or more.

Private emails—daily—continue to confirm that Jewish Israel is being demonized and endangered at progressive and gay gatherings—even when such a conference has promised not to do so again; Listserv groups whose mandate is another subject entirely (psychology, women’s rights, the environment, gay and lesbian rights), continue to choose Palestine over Israel and to bring it in no matter what else is being discussed.

To me, this particular virtue-signaling is equivalent to a Nazi Salute or to the red stripe or star worn under Soviet tyranny. It is meant to signal membership on the right side of history or rather is meant to appease bullies and tyrants—even as one becomes one.

Nothing is objective or fact-based. Everyone has their own “narrative.” All things are subjective and relative. Oddly enough, this is all in the service of the most dreadful conformity.  Racially, ethnically, and sexually marginalized American populations are brandishing propaganda about Palestine as a shield in their own battle against Western white supremacy.

The four horsemen of the Apocalypse are at full gallop and countless rough beasts are slouching towards Bethelemen.

The writer is a Ginsburg-Ingerman Fellow at the Middle East Forum, received the 2013 National Jewish Book Award,.authored 18 books, including Women and Madness and The New Anti-Semitism, and 4 studies about honor killing, Her latest books are An American Bride in Kabul, A Family Conspiracy: Honor Killing and A Politically Incorrect Feminist.

February 1, 2019 | 5 Comments »

Subscribe to Israpundit Daily Digest

Leave a Reply

5 Comments / 5 Comments

  1. Unbelievable! According to today’s Jerusalem Post, the Israeli government permits young Israeli’s to perform “national service,” a substitute for military service, by working for Amnesty International, B’stelem and a host of other subversive anti-Israel organizations–at the expense of the Israeli taxpayer!

    Amnesty recruiting national service volunteers – activists upset
    Amnesty International Israel will “definitely be removed from the list” of organizations eligible to recruit national service (sherut leumi) personnel, one expert said.

    Amnesty International
    Activists of Amnesty International demonstrate to show their support with the Syrian people at the Fontaine des Innocentes in Paris May 29, 2012.. (photo credit: REUTERS)
    Amnesty International Israel is recruiting applicants for Sherut Leumi, Israel National Service.

    Solicitations for the positions are live on the website of Shlomit, one of four organizations that handles national service applications.

    The discovery of the post caused an uproar among some right-wing activists and nationalists. An organization called Betsalmo has registered a formal complaint with the Authority for National Civic Service, calling on the state to immediately prevent national service volunteers from working with the left-wing NGO.
    Last month, Amnesty International, the umbrella organization of Amnesty International Israel, came under fire when it published a report titled “Destination: Occupation” that called on the four largest web vacation booking sites – Airbnb, Booking.com, Expedia and TripAdvisor – to boycott West Bank settlements, as well as Jewish listings in east Jerusalem.

    In the aftermath of the report, Strategic Affairs and Public Safety Minister Gilad Erdan said he would consider banning non-Israeli Amnesty employees from Israel if the organization continued acting against settlement tourism. He called the report “hypocritical,” saying it spoke in the name of human rights but, in practice, supported an antisemitic and delegitimization campaign against Israel.

    Reuven Pinsky, director of the Authority for National Civic Service, acknowledged that he had received these complaints but said, “My hands are tied.”

    “It is crazy that these young people are doing national service with an organization like Amnesty,” said Pinsky, “but I cannot stop the organization from recruiting volunteers.”

    At least for now.

    Pinsky said that beginning in September 2019, Amnesty will “definitely be removed from the list” of organizations eligible to recruit national service personnel. At that time, the March 2017 law that cancels national-service positions in organizations that receive most of their funding from foreign government will come into effect.

    The new law initiated by MK Amir Ohana (Likud) was rooted in his efforts to end state funding of organizations that he considers to be undermining Israeli policy with the support of foreign governments. The bill, which ultimately regulates the entire field of national service in Israel, was based on a report by the right-wing NGO Im Tirtzu, which discovered that there were 12 national service positions available in five organizations that receive most of their funding from foreign governments.

    The five organizations were B’Tselem-The Israel Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories; the Public Committee Against Torture in Israel; Gisha-Legal Center for Freedom of Movement; Israel Social TV; and the Hotline for Refugees and Migrants.

    Amnesty was not on the list. But according to Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development Uri Ariel, whose office oversees national service, “It is important to note that the state does not fund Amnesty’s positions. They pay for them on their own.”

    Gil Naveh, head of media and communications for Amnesty, told The Jerusalem Post that the organization has used national service volunteers for at least a decade or more. He said the organization pays NIS 1,900 for each workers, with most of the funds paying for Shlomit’s administrative services, and a few hundred shekels per month provided to the volunteers.

    Currently, Amnesty has three volunteers working for it. In the past, it has employed as many as six.

    And the Oscar goes to The Likud primary video awards, February 2, 2019 (Courtesy)

    The Shlomit advertisement says it is looking for people interested in coordinating activities and trips related to human rights, providing ongoing support for courses in activism, and creating and implementing media.

    “The national service workers assist with administration, new media and communications,” Naveh explained.

    The organization advertises itself to volunteers by saying, “Amnesty International Israel seeks to prevent the most serious human right violations around the world by means of research, public activism and media and advancing legislation.”

    Naveh, who spoke to the Post from a personal perspective, said, “The fact that the director of Sherut Leumi can say in advance that an organization such as Amnesty will have a problem getting national service volunteers – even before we have made our next request, tells us a lot about how politically motivated this is.”

    He said the legislation itself is seen by Amnesty as just another step in the “long line of steps the government has taken to silence and hurt anyone who criticizes the Israeli government. If the national service workers are taken away from Amnesty, it will be for political reasons, not bureaucratic or regulatory ones.

    “We are not taking this lightly, but we are unphased,” Naveh concluded.

    Pinsky said he has tried many times to have the organization removed from the official list of qualified organizations, but failed.

    “Israel is a democratic state that places heavy protections around issues of freedom of speech and expression,” he said. “Even Arab MKs are able to speak out against Israel. Criticizing the government is not forbidden by law, and that is why we had to change the law.

    “If I could, I would stop it now,” Pinsky added. “It is not a question of desire.”

    He noted that the new law was drawn up in such a way as to prevent issues like this from arising in the future.

    Said Ariel: “We have made history with the enactment of a national civil service law to benefit the service volunteers and to prevent all inciting bodies from receiving volunteers.”

    Sheri Oz contributed to this report.

  2. The Israeli ministry of strategic affairs has published a report on the close relationship between the BDS promoting organizations in America and Europe and the Palestinian terrorist organizations. Summarized in today’s Ynet.com. The cognitive war described by Phyllis Chesler and the shooting-stabbing war in Israel are apparently closely linked.

    BDS: Terrorists in Suits
    Palestinian terror organizations, such as Hamas and the PFLP (Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine), have infiltrated civil society organizations in recent years in order to advance the boycott of Israel as part of the overall strategy of its struggle against Israel, according to a new report.

    Follow Ynetnews on Facebook and Twitter

    According to the report, titled Terrorists in Suits, by the Ministry for Strategic Affairs, headed by Gilad Erdan, a recent study examined 13 international BDS (boycott, divestment and sanctions movement) organizations and found 30 terror activists, past and current, twenty of whom were in prison and some of them murderers and senior terrorists with senior positions in the BDS organizations.

    Minister Gilad Erdan (Photo: Ministry Strategic Affairs)
    Minister Gilad Erdan (Photo: Ministry Strategic Affairs)

    The report, conducted by the research division of the ministry, was released in several languages and will be sent to world leaders and global financial players in order to better combat the BDS organizations. The report states that Israeli courts have labeled some of the activists as posing significant danger to the public. It further noted that terror organizations view BDS as an additional tactic to be used for the destruction of Israel and that the civil organizations serve as an incubator for their activities. The report points to a web of global interconnections between BDS and terror organizations. More than 100 connections were identified including joint campaigns, manpower and financial assistance.
    BDS web
    BDS web

    The report found that convicted terrorists, who maintain their organizational, financial and operative connections with terror groups, serve in senior positions in BDS organizations while trying to keep a low profile by, among other methods, using titles such as journalist, author, dancer, etc. The Palestinian BDS National Committee (BNC) views itself as leading the global BDS campaign. Its cultural and academic arms aggressively advance cultural boycotts and often resort to violence and intimidation against cultural entities that maintain ties with Israel, according to the report. The BNC includes nationalist and Islamic members including members of Hamas and the PFLP. Recently, following information conveyed by the ministry, the crowdfunding site DonorBox blocked the BNC from using its platform to collect donations. As an example: the Palestinian “human rights” organization al-Haq is headed by convicted PFLP terrorist Shawan Jabarin. The report states that Jabarin travels Europe gaining legitimacy from western governments and raises large amounts of money for BDS operations against Israel while being lauded as a human rights advocate. The report also points to Leila Khaled, the female PFLP terrorist who took part in the hijacking of a TWA airliner in 1969 and was also involved in a 1970 attempt to hijack an El Al plane. Khaled promotes and raises money for BDS while still active in illegal terror organizations.
    Leila Khaled
    Leila Khaled

    The report describes a meeting between Khaled and another PFLP terrorist Mustafa Awad at the EU Parliament. They were there advocating for the release of terrorists from Israeli prisons under the auspices of a human rights organization. Awad was sentenced to one year in prison last July for membership in a terror organization including contacts with Hezbollah. The BDS organizations listed in the report receive millions of Euros in funding from European countries and philanthropic foundations. They also receive access to banking and financial services. In light of the release of the report, Minister Erdan said: “The terrorist and boycott organizations are united in their goal of destroying Israel and see de-legitimization and boycotts against Israel as a complementary means to the armed struggle. I expect that following the exposure of the ties between the boycott organizations and the terrorist organizations, the European Union and the sponsoring countries will reconsider their steps regarding the legitimacy and funding they grant BDS organizations.”

  3. The New Israel Fund, funded by American Jews, is continuing its propaganda war against Israel. This includes heavy funding for anti-Israel, pro-BDS Palestinian groups. From the Jewish Press:

    New Israel Fund Organizations Continue To Accuse IDF of War Crimes
    Ronn Torossian29 Shevat 5779 – February 4, 2019
    Photo Credit: wiki

    New Israel Fund proud sponsor of Israel’s enemies
    Radical leftist Israeli organizations backed by the New Israel Fund continue to work against the interests of the State of Israel, now, actively e promoting the prosecution of Israel Defense Forces officers and and soldiers for “war crimes.”

    Adalah, B’Tselem and Yesh Din are cooperating with the UN Commission of Inquiry that is examining whether Israel is perpetrating war crimes in the Gaza Strip, Judea and Samaria and East Jerusalem.

    The U.N. commission drafted documents in Hebrew and Arabic, addressing individuals and organizations and asking them to provide information on the “identification of those responsible” for violating international law and for assistance in determining “personal criminal responsibility and command responsibility.”

    The Israeli organizations cooperated, and last month Yesh Din submitted a position paper to the commission, stating that the State of Israel’s legal position, which justifies the gunfire in Gaza, is in the realm of a “total fabrication” and that the terror attacks by Arabs seeking to murder Israeli civilians and soldiers are not considered acts of war. Michael Sfard, the legal advisor to Yesh Din, testified before the commission, and in a recent interview noted, “I absolutely believe that Israel committed and continues to commit violations of international law, some of which could be war crimes. In my testimony to the commission I expressed precisely that position.”

    B’Tselem and Adalah also provided materials to the commission, which is due to publish its conclusions in March. An Adalah spokesperson told Haaretz the organization is hoping for “the intervention of forces in the international community, to bring about the accountability for the harm to the Palestinians.”

    In his testimony, Sfard claimed the existence of a “total and disgraceful failure of the investigation of complaints of violations of the law by Israeli soldiers toward Palestinians,” such that Israeli soldiers enjoy “almost total immunity from prosecution following harm to Palestinians… The combination of illegal order and the lack of investigations is lethal.”

    The intense concern that Sfard and Yesh Din express regarding the insufficient prosecution of IDF soldiers for war crimes is starkly contrasted by the organization’s forgiving attitude toward the murderous Arab terror. In the position paper filed to the UN commission, Yesh Din levels harsh criticism at the Military Advocate General’s definition of stabbings and car rammings against civilians or soldiers as incidents of “genuine warfare.” According to Yesh Din, these are just “civilian incidents to which the normative response is law enforcement, not warfare.” Yesh Din also does not define the violent activities as terror, but rather as “attempts to cause harm.”

    At the end of his testimony, Sfard addressed the members of the commission and asked them to “pressure the Israeli government to make the open fire orders comply with the requirements of international law and to implement the recommendations of the Turkel Commission concerning the investigation of suspicions of violations of international law by soldiers.” In other words, the radical leftist organizations are sending a clear message to the IDF and the Israeli government: Either start prosecuting soldiers yourselves, or we will assist the international community to turn Israeli commanders and soldiers into men wanted on war crimes charges.

    Its worth noting that the IDF is regarded as one of the most humane armies in the world.

    Adalah – another grantee of the New Israel Fund – was involved with encouraging the UN to open an investigation against Israel. The initiative for the establishment of the commission of inquiry was a joint effort by Adalah and a coalition of anti-Israel organizations including Mezan, Badil, Al-Haq and Association for Civil Rights in Cairo –organizations that advocate the destruction of Israel, and some of which spread virulently anti-Semitic messages.

    Adalah representative Attorney Soheir Asaad told the UN debate on the commission of inquiry that Adalah demanded not only the opening of an international inquiry, but also a promise that “the recommendations and results of the investigation be implemented so that Israel not be able to evade the consequences of its actions, as it has done in the past.” Now, thanks to Adalah’s actions, the commission of inquiry’s foundation document states that one of its objectives is “to put an end to the immunity and ensure accountability, including criminal personal responsibility and command responsibility.”

    According to NGO Monitor, in the past decade the New Israel Fund has transferred $22 Million Dollars to Adalah, B’Tselem and Yesh Din. Is accusing Israel of war crimes, denying her right to self-defense, and enabling Hamas terrorists really what American Jewish donors to the New Israel Fund seek?

  4. Odd that the mayor of Frankfurt,Germany is stepping up to the plate to denounce Amnesty International’s blatent antisemitism, while the American Jewish establishment is silent.

  5. More on Amnesty International’s viciously anti-Israel and antsemitic report:

    Frankfurt mayor says @Amnesty is spreading antisemitism. He’s right. (They are also advocating a crime against humanity.)
    From the Facebook page of Frankfurt mayor Uwe Becker:

    The full text is:

    Amnesty International is promoting ethnic cleansing

    With their recent campaign Amnesty International is walking in the footprints of the antisemitic BDS movement.
    By setting pressure on Online-Booking platforms, that offer overnight stays in settlement regions and in East Jerusalem, Amnesty International is copying the methods and instruments of the antisemitic BDS movement, that proclaims the same aim with an even more militant approach.

    The shocking aspect of this present AI campaign is formulated in the conclusion and the recommendations of the AI report.

    Amnesty International says:
    „Israel must immediately cease all settlement activity, dismantle all settlements and move its civilians from occupied territory into Israel proper. Third states must ensure by all legal means that Israel does so.”

    Proposing, that Israel must “move its civilians from occupied territory into Israel proper” is nothing more and nothing less than promoting ethnic cleansing.

    To my mind, this is a shocking scandal, that AI demands to push Jews out of all settlement areas and East Jerusalem and other parts of Israel.

    AI has crossed a red line and is spreading antisemitism.

    Becker is touching on one of the supreme ironies of organizations like Amnesty and the UN.

    They invoke the Fourth Geneva Conventions Article 49 paragraph 6, which says “The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies,” and pretend that this applies to Israel, even though the Jewish residents of Judea and Samaria moved there quite voluntarily and were not deported or transferred. The entire intent of the entire Article 49 as a whole is to prohibit transferring people against their will.

    Paragraph 1 says, “Individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the territory of the Occupying Power or to that of any other country, occupied or not, are prohibited, regardless of their motive.”

    The Jews of Judea and Samaria are protected persons under Geneva. If you consider the territories occupied, as the UN and Amnesty does, then the circumstances of how the Jews got there are absolutely irrelevant. In fact, I would guess that more than half the inhabitants now were born there.

    The idea that a state should forcibly transfer a half million people against their will, for any reason, is anathema to the Geneva Conventions and international law. Even if you don’t say that the territories are occupied, international law says that “The long-standing definition of ‘deportation’ as a crime against humanity included the crime of forced population transfer within a state’s borders.”

    And, yes, this is antisemitism. I have never seen Amnesty or any other organization even mention the thousands of Israeli Arabs who have moved across the Green Line (in Beit Hanina, Beit Safafa, Mount Scopus or French Hill, for example) as “settlers.” Only Jews get that designation, and only Jews are demanded by “human rights organizations” to be forcibly moved.

    This is literal antisemitism, being pushed by Amnesty International.