The Deception Marathon of Benghazigate/ Bostongate A Conspiracy?

Jim Horn knows whereof he speaks. He came to see me a few years ago in Jerusalem and we had a great chat. He brought me a copy of his book, DiDiDawDawDiDi. His bio discloses that he worked for the State Department for a quarter century and got to know Islam and the CIA. In this article he says the cover-up was to avoid news of the gunrunning to al Qaeda becoming public. Ted Belman

By James E. Horn
Retired U.S. Diplomat (Counter Terrorism)
Author: EXPERIENCING ISLAM [Censored by the CIA, Banned by Librarians]

We need to demand that the Congress investigate deeper into the cause behind the Islamic terrorist bombing in Boston. Investigate the reasons why Benghazi was attacked by Islamic terrorists. What was really going on in Benghazi that Clinton and Obama are so desperate to bury. There are links tying them together. Some dot connecting is done here.

The Obama administration, bereft of moral clarity and decency is demonstrably the least trustworthy and most corrupt and corrupted administration this country has ever experienced. There may be people who will disagree with this assessment because cognitive skills do happen to escape some people. The buck stops at Obama’s desk.

Hillary Clinton, Barak Obama, Leon Panetta, and dozens more worked tirelessly not to solve the Benghazigate incident, but instead to cover it up, and it is now apparent that the same Obama crew are busily covering up certain aspects or threads linking to the Boston jihadi (dare I use the forbidden term, Islamic terrorist) attack.

Four people were slaughtered by Islamic jihadis in Benghazi and Obama, Clinton, and dozens of others lied blaming the “Innocence of Muslims” video trailer that had been posted on the internet for several months without notice. Clearly the lies of Obama, Clinton, and others remain an intentional attempt to blame innocent people for the terrorist attack committed by an al Qaeda affiliate, and to cover for other nefarious activities.

Reportedly, the Islamic terrorist action at Benghazi took the CIA by surprise. That’s no surprise. The handicapped CIA is inept in gathering and analyzing meaningful on-the-ground intelligence. The causes of the CIA’s ineptitude are discussed in detail in the (censored by the CIA) book EXPERIENCING ISLAM and Becoming Islam-Aware.

Apparently, the clandestine operations side of the CIA was heavily involved in the illegal acquisition of weapons from terrorist al Qaeda affiliates in Libya and shipping them to al Qaeda Sunni terrorists in Syria via Turkey. Of course, we taxpayers paid the bill for these weapons. One cannot claim that the so-called freedom fighters in Syria are all Syrians. Several thousand Turks, Palestinians, Jordanians, Saudis, and others are involved. The Saudis are their paymasters. The CIA, which is infiltrated by Islamist fifth columnists, aka The Moslem Brotherhood, who are not kindly disposed towards the USA was acting at the behest of the Sunni Saudis who hate and fear the Shiia/Alawites who govern Syria and Iran, and much of Iraq. Obama was aware of all of this as was Hillary Clinton both of whom may have played active roles in planning this. They certainly jumped in for the cover up and lied and lied for weeks until mounting pressure forced them to admit their deceit – that the terrorist act was a planned and orchestrated al Qaeda attack. Americans died, and Obama and Clinton lied. We should never forget this.
Unbelievably, the State Department even had a contract with al Qaeda affiliates to provide security at the consulate office. What level of audacious stupidity prevailed here?

There were adequate USAF, USMC, and Naval forces nearby who could have gone in and settled the peace quickly within a few hours. They were repeatedly ordered to stand down, and General Ham, who was in charge of AFRICOM, was cashiered for whatever role he played. Why? Did he have the courage stand up to the Obama crew who perhaps wanted the Ambassador dead?

Once highly respected Ambassador Thomas Pickering co-chaired the Accountability Review Board and his now discredited performance was a sell out, a whitewash of Clinton’s and Obama’s failure. He failed to examine all sides of the story and went for the politically correct action of covering for the Obama and Clinton party line. He sold his honor and integrity. Shame on him! Oh, and Hillary reportedly ran this little project closely in order to control the results.

Weeks after the incident, we learned that there were about thirty additional Americans present in Benghazi during this terrorist attack. They were hustled out of the country and into solitude (imprisoned) where months later nobody knows who they are or where they are, or why they are being silenced. Some who want to come out and to talk about this have been threatened by the Obama administration. Finally, three testified before the Congress and painted a dire picture. They were honest and believe me, their careers are now toast. This stinks! The Clinton/Obama/Rice lies are obviously a cover up to keep the American public from knowing the depth of the Obama/Clinton involvement and why. Who is pulling their puppet strings?

And, of course, Clinton and her team of geniuses started firing lower level State Department employees in an other wave to deflect attention from their misdeeds.

The Saudis and other Arabs who have reportedly provided millions in illegal (laundered) funds for Obama’s two elections have IOU’s coming from Obama, and they called these in. The Sunnis want the Shiia/Alawite Assad regime to fall, and are doing all that they can to make this happen. They are using us surrogate servants towards this end. The Clintons are no less involved in that they receive millions of dirty Arab oil money as well via ‘slick’ Willie’s regular “speaking” trips to the oil states and then collecting multi-million dollar honorariums on a very regular basis. Hillary may well receive as much as a half of a billion laundered petro-dollars for her 2016 run for the Presidency. The Saudis are determined to keep control of our government away from we the people, and Hillary is panting for the job.

In short, the President of the United States is owned by the Saudis and their partners as is aspiring future President of the United States, Hillary Clinton.

From commentator Burt Prelutzky: For sheer irony, it’s hard to beat Hillary Clinton, who campaigned as the person we’d all want to see at the receiving end of a 3 a.m. phone call, totally botch the call she got in the wee hours regarding Benghazi.

Next, we have the savage Boston Marathon terrorist blasts which were wildly cheered by “peace loving” Moslems the world over. Alert and capable Boston police quickly apprehended a Saudi citizen in the early stages of their investigation. His name is Abdul al-Harbi, a student permitted to attend school in Findlay, Ohio, where he never attended, and is a terror watch list subject who received preferential (politically influenced) treatment in getting his visa. He was slightly wounded and spent a short period of time in a Boston hospital where he was reportedly visited by the first lady of the United States, Michelle Obama (There are other rumors that this Haribi or another al Haribi has been a guest at the White House.). It doesn’t take much skill to conclude that Haribi is obviously an operational Islamic jihadist. He has several relatives involved with the terrorist al Qaeda network. Two of his terrorist kinfolk are ensconced at Gitmo. Is Haribi motivated to take some sort of revenge on America? You betcha! Were fifteen of the 9/11 hijackers fellow Saudis? You betcha! Is Haribi well schooled in terrorism? You betcha! Does Haribi have access to sufficient funds to hire jihadis to do his bidding in this? You betcha!

How the hell did this swine, Haribi ever get a visa to come to the USA in the first place? Did he get his visa because of corruption in the State Department? You betcha! Was “Congressional” influence possibly involved in getting his visa? You betcha!

Within hours of this jihadi, Haribi, being apprehended by the excellent Boston police, the FBI took over the investigation, and just hours later, this terrorist Saudi prince of slime was ‘deported’ back to Saudi Arabia. Why? We know that the FBI is also infiltrated by Islamic terrorists, aka The Moslem Brotherhood and its Council on American Islamic Relations. It’s no great leap of faith to connect the dots indicating that someone at the Saudi Embassy told someone at the White House to take action, and the White House told someone at the Justice Department, who told someone at the FBI, who told others to get the SOB out of America before the Boston police could grab onto his miserable backside, and his apparently very close ties to the Saudi royal family were revealed. [Concidentally, within hours of AlHaribi’s being identified as a person of interest, the Saudis unleashed a diplomatic blitz on the White House (a personal, and very private consultation initiated by the Saudi Ambassador and Obama’s immediate acquiescence to the demand of the Saudi master) was followed by Al Haribi’s being ‘deported’.] Are Saudis tied to this act of jihadi terrorism, this blatant act of war, on American soil? You double betcha!

A week after the terrorist attack on the citizens of Boston, The FBI and the compliant media claimed that these two al Qaeda trained [and Saudi financed] Daghistani terrorists were merely acting out on religious grounds. Does that stench of lies bother you? It does me!

A week after the terrorist attack, the FBI concluded that there were possibly twelve others involved in the Islamic terrorist cell. How did the FBI arrive at this number?

The FBI actions in assisting the likely co-conspirator, AlHaribi, and terrorist cell leader in the jihadi attack need to be investigated. As the plot thickens, we now learn that two very capable and competent FBI agents involved in the Tsarnayev case have just died (or were they executed because they knew too much and had the gumption to stand up for what might be right?) in a “training” exercise.

The Tsarnaev family came here as refugees in fear for their lives, lived on welfare, and then returned, traveled to and from Russia (air tickets are not cheap) which they had fled (in fear of death), all on taxpayer backs. Why was this allowed? Some of those 16,000 IRS agents that Obama is taking on to go after the 150 million or so American taxpayers ought to be re-focused on immigrants who refuse to assimilate, get jobs, and pay their own fair share.
Is it unusual for FBI agents to get killed in training exercises? This is exactly what happened to FBI agents involved in going after the brothers Tsnarnaev: Russian newspaper, Pravda reported: “An official statement from the FBI says that special agents Christopher Lorek and Stephen Shaw “fell” out of a helicopter while training a complex exercise.” Fell? Really? What information regarding the Tsarnayev Brothers and al Haribi did they take to their graves.

Ibragim Todashev is dead. He was an ‘acquaintance’ of Tamerlin Tsarnayev and they trained in Mixed Martial Arts together in Boston at the time when three men were killed by having their throats cut (al Qaeda style). Little brother Tsarnayev wasn’t big enough to participate in this barbarity and Tamerlin couldn’t have done it alone, and apparently Todashev was involved. To kill three men takes a bit of muscle, and it is likely that at least three men participated in that grizly murder. Who could have that third murderer be? Al Haribi?

Two FBI agents accompanied by some Boston police went to interview Todashev at his home during the wee hours of the morning in Miami. Why meet with a ‘person of interest’ at that time of day? No cameras, no microphones, and a man who confessed to others that he was afraid that the FBI would kill him? Todashev, in the midst of the ‘interview’ reportedly went off and those big, strong, law enforcement types couldn’t restrain or disable him. Seven “kill” shots to the upper torso killed him rather than using disabling shots to the torso seems like an execution to me. What secrets about al Haribi did he take to his grave?

June 15, 2013 | 3 Comments »

Subscribe to Israpundit Daily Digest

Leave a Reply

3 Comments / 3 Comments

  1. this article needs to go further and draw the inevitable conclusions arising from the acceptance that the US was supplying jihadis arms and training through and with the
    GCC. everything over the past 20 years should be re-assessed in this light. the benghazi events could be more than a cover up of the arms deals it could also be and intentional setup to remove the only witness to hillary’s involvement as Stens was the only link to hillary. Why would an “ambassdor” be sent to arrange arms collections and shipments. Also there are other scenarios which should be considered: arms deal gone bad, syrian/russian/iranian attack, “stage “kidnappping” gone wrong. Certainly the witholding of aid by the top level begs explanation that is credible. The Petraeus “scandal” is a related sideshow. One thing for sure is that the govt explanations are complete fabrications and about 20 witnesses have disappeared or being secretly incarcerated.

  2. In this article he says the cover-up was to avoid news of the gunrunning to al Qaeda becoming public. Ted Belman

    Ihave been saying this for months and was even called a conspiracy nut for implying a GCC US alliance. My best source was aaron klein on this issue and he also mentioned that the saudis were sending recruited jihadi names to the US for vetting to see if they had operated against the US pror(LOL) Also Klein had said that the US was training jihadis in Jordan. Once one accepts that the US was arming and training jihdis through and with the GCC then many questions begin to surface. If they were supplying arms to the syrian jihadis then what was the purpose for not supplying the FSA umbrella group which included seculars and democrats? My answer is that it enable them to appear to be cautious while achieving the goals through the saudis; there was no place for the seculars in the deal except as a fig leaf. Another more pressing question should be: If the US is working through and with the saudis/jihadis today, and the US was doing the same in the 1980″s with the saudis/jihadis and pakis in afghanistan, would it not be illogical to believe that the relation between the US and the saudi/jihadis was not in operation during the interim 20 years? There is no space between the jihadis the saudis and the US today and there has been no space for the past 4 decades. The relationship today being exposed is at the same time exposing the relationship of the last 4 decades through many administrations. What does this say about the two 911’s, the boston marathon, etc, etc etc. and the strange sending of saudis out by bush. The US, the GCC/jihadis are as distant as a butt and a bench. Any appearance of conflict between the jihadis and the sauds is BS; except that the iranians have co-opted their own networks against the sunni GCC. The only reason that the US is in Syria is because it facilitates, or is at the behest of, the GCC.In my view all of the following are closely related to benghazi and the GCC US alliance: the faux pal state, the jordan pal revived confed talk,e gaza war and targeting of iranian gazan operatives to the benefit of hamas/gcc relationship, the gaza cease-fire brokered by qatar, the hamas leashing by Qatar, the Qatar request of Israel to invest 500 mill for gaza redevelopment, the gaza offshore gas, Qatar ownership of the worlds largest offshore gas field, Qatar/saudi/gcc funding and recruiting of jihadi mercenaries to syria, qatar funding of egypt with energy, egypts crackdown on hamas,turkish/kurdish cease-fire, kurdish rebels leaving turkey,Turkish pipeline to the med, turkish purchasing and transport of kurdish oil, breaking of Iraq into sunni/shia,kurdish zones, the fatwas issued by al qaeda’s #2 zawahari against the “devil”shias, etc … All of this points to a US GCC alliance to assert GCC hegemony and destabilize Iran and its proxies. the Iranians hijacked the playing of the anti israel card from the arabs and used it to destabilize the GCC regimes with their own internal anti monarchical jihadis. For the west there has been a 4 decade dependable, reliable and stable supply of oil controlled by the GCC and their jihaid mercenaries. why wouldn’t the west establish their hegemony in other arenas when they have demonstrated such dependable success?

  3. A week after the terrorist attack on the citizens of Boston, The FBI and the compliant media claimed that these two al Qaeda trained [and Saudi financed] Daghistani terrorists were merely acting out on religious grounds. Does that stench of lies bother you? It does me!

    Well they were acting out on religious grounds.