The Problem with Terrorism Is TERROR

October 20, 2025 | 5 Comments »

Leave a Reply

5 Comments / 5 Comments

  1. AI Overview

    +3
    In a May 1992 speech following the Los Angeles riots, Vice President Dan Quayle directly addressed the question of who was to blame for the violence.
    In his speech to the Commonwealth Club of California, Quayle stated:
    “When I have been asked during these last weeks who caused the riots and the killing in L.A., my answer has been direct and simple: Who is to blame for the riots? The rioters are to blame. Who is to blame for the killings? The killers are to blame.”
    During the same address, Quayle also connected the riots to what he described as a “poverty of values” and a breakdown of the family structure, criticizing the popular television show Murphy Brown for “mocking the importance of fathers”.

  2. The problem with “terrorism” is that it has become normalized, so much so that it has lost much of its original impact. Think of school shootings. The first few were horrific and unthinkable. Now, when one happens, it’s an unfortunate, but rather ho-hum, event, (I’m just saying). Consequently, terror attacks need to be larger, or more outrageous, just to get the desired amount of media attention. This phenomenon doesn’t just apply to physical attacks. Outrageous behavior and speech, which are corollary to overt terrorism, have increased exponentially in recent years, to the point where people call the Israeli PM a Na_i, or ride bicycles through the streets of Portland in the nude. [BTW, if you have seen some of those people, it really is “terrorism”.] What I would like to know is when, where, and how will this love affair with extremism, (aka, terrorism), ever end.