The U.S. should push for the disarming of Hamas in Gaza-Israel cease-fire

Washington Post Editorial Board surprises:

The depravity of Hamas’s strategy seems lost on much of the outside world, which — following the terrorists’ script — blames Israel for the civilian casualties it inflicts while attempting to destroy the tunnels. While children die in strikes against the military infrastructure that Hamas’s leaders deliberately placed in and among homes, those leaders remain safe in their own tunnels. There they continue to reject cease-fire proposals, instead outlining a long list of unacceptable demands.

One of those demands is for a full reopening of Gaza’s land and sea borders. While this would allow relief and economic development for the territory’s population, it would also allow Hamas to import more missiles and concrete for new tunnels. Secretary of State John F. Kerry, the Egyptian government and other would-be brokers are right to seek a cease-fire, but they should reject Hamas’s agenda.

Instead, any political accord should come after a cease-fire and be negotiated with the Palestinian leadership of Mahmoud Abbas. It should link opening of the borders and other economic concessions to the return to Gaza of the security forces of the Palestinian Authority, the disarmament of Hamas and elections for a new government.

July 24, 2014 | 2 Comments »

Subscribe to Israpundit Daily Digest

Leave a Reply

2 Comments / 2 Comments

  1. Instead, any political accord should come after a cease-fire and be negotiated with the Palestinian leadership of Mahmoud Abbas. It should link opening of the borders and other economic concessions to the return to Gaza of the security forces of the Palestinian Authority, the disarmament of Hamas and elections for a new government.

    If elections are held after the current war in Gaza, it is possible for Fatah/PA to win in Gaza. Fatah could loose to Hamas in West Bank. Will PA and other Arabs recognize Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state? The answer is obvious.

    Hamas and PA have tactical differences. Both of them have common strategic interest (the destruction of the Jewish state).

    After defeating Hamas in Gaza and have Gaza demilitarized, PA should be dealt with before they strengthen themselves like Hamas.

  2. Instead, any political accord should come after a cease-fire and be negotiated with the Palestinian leadership of Mahmoud Abbas

    @bernard ross:
    Hmmmmm….
    Where did I hear about THAT one before…..