Redacted with Clayton Morris
Israpundit is entirely dependent on readers support. Please help me continue educating people with the truth about what is going on in Israel and around the world.
Redacted with Clayton Morris
Israpundit is entirely dependent on readers support. Please help me continue educating people with the truth about what is going on in Israel and around the world.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
This was a repeated claim made in this interview, but the truth is that the indemnification does not protect against fraud. It will be decided, of course, by the courts, which is less than certain as to how this will be ruled upon, but Pharma is far from being in the clear at present. Much will be decided with the Brook Jackson whistleblower case. She has clear evidence of fraud, and the defense of Pharma is not that the evidence of fraud does not demonstrate the presence of fraud, but that the govt was a collaborating party eliminating Pharma’s actions from being considered fraud. As Robert Barnes, Jackson’s lawyer explains:
https://zero-sum.org/pfizer-defense-against-vaccine-fraud-case/
Consequently, the conclusion that Pharma will not pay a dime is far from certain. It would require, once again, for a court to deem fraudulent activity as being legitimate, and in this case, it would mean that the legal system was certifying that the these corporations could get away with murder, the murder of literally unknowable numbers of people to which the number keeps rising. That is a tall ask for a court to stipulate, as I see things, but time will tell.