UNRWA: Refuge Of Rejectionism

Barry Rubin, Asaf Romirowsky, and Jonathan Spyer
GLORIA

The GLORIA Center has released a new report, ‘UNRWA: Refuge of Rejectionism?’ The report details how this UN agency, nominally a humanitarian effort to help Palestinian refugees, has in fact become a major barrier to resolving the conflict as well as furnishing finances, facilities, and recruits for terrorist groups.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

On the surface, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) seems a humanitarian group helping Palestinian refugees. In reality, it actually helps destroy the chance of Arab-Israeli peace, promotes terrorism, and holds Palestainians back from rebuilding their lives.

Unique in history, UNRWA’s job is to keep Palestinian refugees in suspended animation–and at low living standards–until they achieve the goal set for them by the PLO and Hamas: Israel’s extinction. In the meantime, their suffering and anger is maintained as a weapon to encourage them toward violence and intransigence.

UNRWA schools become hotbeds of anti-Western, anti-American, and anti-Semitic indoctrination, recruiting offices for terrorist groups. UNRWA’s services are dominated by radicals who staff and subsidize radical groups while potentially intimidating anyone from voicing a different line. UNWRA facilities are used to store and transport weapons, actually serving as military bases.

In this process, UNRWA has broken all the rules that are supposed to govern humanitarian enterprises. Consequently, UNRWA is the exact opposite of other refugee relief operations. They seek to resettle refugees; UNRWA is dedicated to blocking resettlement. They help refugees to live normal lives so that they can move on with their existence; UNRWA’s role is to ensure their lives remain abnormal so they are filled with anger and a thirst for revenge that inspires violence and can only be quenched by a victorious return. They try to create stable conditions for refugees; UNRWA’s mission is to enable radical political activity and indoctrination by armed groups which ensures a continual state of near chaos.

The time has come, especially given the Hamas takeover of the Gaza Strip, which also signals a Hamas takeover of the UNRWA facilities there, to reevaluate the role of UNRWA. If it is indeed very much a part of the problem–a barrier to resolving the refugees’ status and returning them to normal lives; a barrier to resolving the Arab-Israeli conflict; and a source of violence–it should be dissolved and replaced by something better.

Three basic steps are required to do this. They would improve the refugees’ lives and strengthen moderate Palestinian forces.

    First, UNRWA should be dissolved.

    Second, all services it provides should be transferred to other agencies within the UN, notably the UNHCR, which has a long and productive experience in this area.

    Third, responsibility for normal social services should be turned over to the Palestinian Authority. Most UNRWA staff should be transferred to it. Donors should use the maximum amount of oversight to ensure this be done effectively.

People often wonder why violence and instability persists and why the Arab-Israeli conflict is so seemingly impossible to resolve. One important part of the answer is that UNRWA perpetuates the problem. All those seeking real progress toward peace between Israelis and Palestinians need to take a close look at this unacceptable situation. All those with responsibility for the management of these issues need to work for a change of course.

Barry Rubin is director of the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center and editor of the Middle East Review of International Affairs Journal. His latest books are The Israel-Arab Reader (seventh edition), with Walter Laqueur (Viking-Penguin); the paperback edition of The Truth About Syria (Palgrave-Macmillan); A Chronological History of Terrorism, with Judy Colp Rubin, (Sharpe); and The Long War for Freedom: The Arab Struggle for Democracy in the Middle East (Wiley).

Dr. Jonathan Spyer is a senior research fellow at the Global Research in International Affairs Center at the Interdisciplinary Center, Herzliya Israel.

Asaf Romirowsky is the Manager of Israel & Middle East Affairs for the Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia and an associate fellow at the Middle East Forum.

June 21, 2008 | 4 Comments »

Leave a Reply

2 Comments / 4 Comments

  1. If my FIRST THESIS/THEORY about the beast and the false prophet is the correct one, then the victories of the Islamic beast will not just be historically true, but futuristically. Imagine Islamic countries with WMDs like Russia and China has. The Islamic beast could very well defeat the entire world if we are not careful to thwart their plans to accumulate nuclear power, fuel, and WMDs.

    If my SECOND THESIS/THEORY about the Masonic beast is the correct one, the nations of Islam will be reformed by a Masonic world government, as it was during the 20th Century and can still effect during the 21st Century. If Islamic rulers become successful, everything Masons have built will be destroyed by the Islamic countries – as the Babylon the Great of Revelation 17 is destroyed.

    These are my two workable theories – both of which could occur at the same time – as it is today. One thing we must not do is become complacent out of fear. I like a Masonic world better than an Islamic world, because at least Masons strive for peace, intelligence, and SOME Biblical thought, whereas conversion to Islam is the whole theme of Islam and peace can’t come unless the world converts to Allah.

    Instead of being caught between the devil and the deep blue sea, we are caught between Masons and Muslims! Make your choice.

  2. Barry Rubin’s advice makes good sense. But UNRWA is a bureaucracy with a vested privilege in its own existence. That plus the Arab states’ need to retain a weapon against Israel will preclude its demise.